Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Blacks unlikely to experiment due to forced changes

Scott Barrett. (Photo by Brett Phibb/Photosport)

With at least one major change already required to the All Blacks‘ match-day squad for their second test with Ireland on Saturday, head coach Ian Foster must now weight up the merits of any further rotation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Delayed concussion symptoms mean the most experienced player in the country, second-rower Sam Whitelock, won’t feature at Forsyth Barr Stadium this weekend. With Whitelock unavailable, the next most senior lock in the squad, Brodie Retallick, is expected to take on lineout duties.

That means the big question for Foster is whether to shift Scott Barrett from blindside flanker into the second row.

Video Spacer

Ardie Savea and the All Blacks react to the first test against Ireland.

Video Spacer

Ardie Savea and the All Blacks react to the first test against Ireland.

Barrett’s selection in the No 6 jersey for the opening test of the series raised a few eyebrows, especially when Foster made no suggestion that it was a decision forced by injury. The All Blacks did confirm last week that Akira Ioane wasn’t 100 per cent fit but naming Barrett on the flank was ostensibly a tactical decision.

Barrett had a solid game in the unfamiliar role, throwing his body about with abandon and topping the tackle charts. There was enough to suggest that the 28-year-old deserves another shot in the position – but Whitelock’s unavailability could curtail any chance of that happening.

Having already lost Josh Lord to a season-ending injury, and with fellow youngster Tupou Vaa’i sidelined due to Covid, Barrett and Retallick are now the only two locks from the original squad who are fit and ready for selection. Patrick Tuipulotu has also joined the team as cover but it’s unlikely he would be rushed straight back into the starting side – which means Barrett’s experiment at No 6 might be over for the rest of the series, especially if Ioane is ready for action.

Even without Ioane on deck, however, Dalton Papalli or Pita Gus Sowakula could be called upon to start on the blindside. The latter would certainly be a more like-for-like replacement for Barrett but only made his test debut last week and has just a handful of matches on the side of the scrum, whereas the inclusion of Papalii would effectively see the All Blacks running with three openside flankers in tandem and might not bring the best balance to the game. The left-field solution could see Ardie Savea move from the back of the scrum to the side, into the role he filled throughout much of 2019, allowing Sowakula or Hoskins Sotutu to take over at number 8.

ADVERTISEMENT

Elsewhere in the side, it’s the possible availability of Will Jordan, Jack Goodhue and David Havili – all following Covid – that could prompt the only other changes to the run-on team.

“There’s absolutely no pressure from the players, management, coaches, anyone for them to rush back in,” said captain Sam Cane of the returning trio. “They were on a bike yesterday with some sort of heart-rate monitor on measuring how they were responding to exercise so all the precautions are being taken there. The last thing anyone would want is to risk them getting long Covid so there’s no pressure and they’ll have a few boxes to tick during the week to be available.

Assuming their availability, Jordan was the first-choice No 14 last year and is now going head-to-head with Leicester Fainga’anuku and Sevu Reece for a spot on the wing. The former only made his debut against Ireland but didn’t look out of place at all, while Reece was one of the best players on the back for the All Blacks. With plenty more games to play this year, it could be that the All Blacks opt to ease Jordan back into action via the bench or give him another week off following his bout with Covid – which would also reward Fainga’anuku and Reece for their displays in the first test.

Related

Similary, young midfield back Quinn Tupaea had the most composed showing of his short international career to date over the weekend and it would be a shame to replace him with either Goodhue or Havili in the No 12 jersey when things are starting to come right for the 23-year-old.

ADVERTISEMENT

It could be that with both Beauden and Jordie Barrett likely for the run-on team, Foster opts to run without specialist flyhalf cover for the coming match, giving Jordan and one of the fit-again midfielders spots on the bench. Undoubtedly, Foster and his fellow selectors have gone into the three-match series with at least a loose plan of how to utilise all the troops and that would likely involve Richie Mo’unga getting a start in the third test, which means they can afford to flog Beauden Barrett for another 80 minutes before giving him a break in the final match of the series.

Without Sam Whitelock on deck, the second test will be expected to be a closer affair – and that means the All Blacks won’t want to make wholesalechanges to their team. With everyone in last week’s squad performing well, from No 1 through to No 23, it’s unlikely there will be many further changes to the lineup beyond Whitelock’s enforced absence and a shake-up in the loose forwards.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 57 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Watch: Retallick scores, Perenara makes Black Rams debut -Japan Rugby League One Retallick scores; Perenara makes debut -Japan Rugby League
Search