Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'All points are important because we know that it is a tough competition'

WHANGAREI, NEW ZEALAND - OCTOBER 15: Marlie Packer of England runs the ball during the Pool C Rugby World Cup 2021 match between France and England at Northland Events Centre on October 15, 2022, in Whangarei, New Zealand. (Photo by Fiona Goodall - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

While the England-France game in Pool C of the Rugby World Cup will be remembered for the Red Roses extending their winning streak, for the French there are lots of reasons to be optimistic.

ADVERTISEMENT

With France scoring seven points to England’s 13, and having weathered a pair of early injury replacements, Les Bleus will take heart that they came closer to winning against their old enemy than they have in a considerable time.

Talismanic scrum-half Laura Sansus left the field after just 12 minutes with Romana Menager removed four minutes later after being knocked unconscious in a ruck. The French would have been forgiven for taking a backward step at this point but it seemed, if anything, to light a fire under them. The introductions of Bourdon and Hermet an example of how they could match their opposition for depth.

Video Spacer

England fans supremely confident but the two sides of French fans on show after loss | Women’s Rugby World Cup

Video Spacer

England fans supremely confident but the two sides of French fans on show after loss | Women’s Rugby World Cup

“It was a very tough game, very difficult. We didn’t have many balls. On the other hand, we showed a lot of solidarity in defence and that will help us for the rest of the competition.” Agathe Sochat said, speaking after the game.

“I think we relied a lot on our defence, it was a key point today to be reassured. We gave the ball back a lot on foot. On the other hand, we were relatively effective when we were in their territory, so that’s a strong point and we’re going to continue to work on that to be a little bit more at the opponent’s side and score.”

That positivity is key for France who will go on to face Fiji next week and will likely finish second in Pool C. Head coach Thomas Darracq, while pleased with his team’s performance, sees plenty of opportunities to improve further. “These games are not always won on domination with the ball. Tonight we are 13-7, we take the defensive bonus, we make a big game, that’s what I remember tonight.”

“The footwork was not up to what we are capable of doing. We didn’t perform as well as usual, a lot of little mistakes, a lot of touches that weren’t long enough. There were so many little things that I only want to keep the positive tonight. Tonight we are very satisfied with the team’s performance.”

ADVERTISEMENT

For now, France look ahead to an unpredictable Fijiana side and for their imperious centre Gabrielle Vernier confidence is high. “We keep a lot of confidence for the future. A result like this can only be valuable for the future. We will have to show more things in attack against Fiji.”

Perhaps most important for France is that they captured a bonus point in defeat and denied England the extra point in their victory. As Darracq puts it “All points are important because we know that it is a tough competition, we know that anything can be played on a game. We took the bonus point, that’s very positive. Now, we will very quickly switch to the Fiji game.”. It will certainly make for a more interesting run to the finals with the scores and the way the competition is seeded there is now a good chance of France meeting the Black Ferns in the semi-finals, a fixture that should excite any rugby fan!

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search