Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All You Need is Glove: Can Aaron Smith Spark a Rugby Fashion Revival?

AARON SMITH . PHOTO / GETTY

Fingerless gloves. Those distinctive mit warmers were once the height of rugby haute couture. Then they inexplicably vanished without a trace. Can Aaron Smith work his magic, and bring them back?

ADVERTISEMENT
AARON SMITH ROCKING HIS FINGERLESS GLOVES. PHOTO / GETTY
AARON SMITH ROCKING HIS FINGERLESS GLOVES. PHOTO / GETTY

The biggest story out of Super Rugby over the last couple of weeks wasn’t the Highlanders’ timely return to form, with wins over the Chiefs and Crusaders. Rather, it was Aaron Smith’s retro fashion sense, and its implications for the future of the league.

Are the fingerless gloves that swept the rugby world in the early 2000’s ready for a comeback? Smith certainly thinks so, seemingly having dug through his older brother or even dad’s old gear to find a pair.

Wearing mittens gained traction in rugby’s most fashion-forward circles around 15 years ago, justified by the tenuous pretense that they helped players grip the ball. Even the very staid All Black environment permitted their use, but it was when the 2003 English team got their gloved hands on the Rugby World Cup that they reached the height of their popularity. The team even went so far as to have their flag on the gloves themselves.

For around three years they could be found on the hands of everyone from the burliest prop to the most nimble fullback, in every nation and across all grades.

However, around 2004 they all-but vanished, perhaps as a result of players figuring out that they didn’t really help that much, or simply because they’d found a new fashion to indulge in like growing rat’s tails or dreadlocks.

ADVERTISEMENT

For more than a decade fingerless gloves wandered in obscurity, an almost-forgotten relic of a distant era. Two weeks ago, that all changed, when Smith wandered onto the field wearing a pair of his finest finger-free fashion accessories.

Perhaps other players could follow Smith’s lead and bring back some other rugby fads of the past, like props cutting off one sleeve of their jerseys, taping up their eyebrows or donning Madison headgear.

Smith himself has been tight-lipped on the issue, limiting his Twitter time to pictures of his dinner, retweeting articles about himself and overusing exclamation marks. It’s debatable whether the gloves helped his game or not. He’s played extremely well in his gloved-up games, but that was expected given his status as the world’s best in his position. One thing’s for sure though: he’s never looked better.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search