Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Allianz Premier 15s could unveil overhauled line-up in spring 2023

By PA
April Ishida of DMP Durham Sharks and Ella Wyrwas of Saracens Women during Saracens' 77-5 win in the Premier 15s

The Allianz Premier 15s could unveil an overhauled line-up in spring 2023 following the conclusion of a now-opened tender process.

ADVERTISEMENT

Women’s rugby in England is set to transform over the next decade, with the RFU in June announcing a £220million investment and plans to professionalise the top flight.

It could be a tantalising incentive for the clubs who will be invited to meet with the union over the next two months and make their case for inclusion from the 2023-24 season.

Video Spacer

Wales’ Ffion Lewis on becoming professional and preparing for the World Cup | Tunnel Talk | Episode 3

Video Spacer

Wales’ Ffion Lewis on becoming professional and preparing for the World Cup | Tunnel Talk | Episode 3

Alex Teasdale, head of the women’s game at the RFU, said: “We are looking forward to receiving the responses to the Request for Proposals and progressing the development plans to ensure we deliver a robust platform and ensure the next cycle of the Premier 15s continues to grow the sport at every level.”

Most Premier 15s clubs are affiliated with a Gallagher Premiership side, with London Irish, Leicester Tigers and Newcastle Falcons among those with rumoured interest in joining clubs like Harlequins, Saracens and Bristol Bears in the next iteration of the league.

Investment will be used to, according to a June RFU strategy document, “support a transformative uplift in the Minimum Operating Standards (MOS) for clubs, which will mandate substantial investment in the performance environment. This will include an increase in the number of coaching staff, enhanced S&C provision, performance lifestyle support, medical cover and improved facility quality and access.” Plans for improved matchday requirements and marketing are also included.

The tender process will see a shortlist created by November 22 and clubs internally notified of the outcome, following presentations to the selection panel, by the end of the year, with the new line-up to be made public in spring 2023.

ADVERTISEMENT

The new cycle also, said the RFU, “represents a significant departure from the league as it is today” with plans to transform the Premier 15s from 2023-24 into a new company, owned by the RFU and clubs, with its own CEO and board and projected revenues of £174m over the 10-year period.

While the news of more robust standards and investment will be welcome to some, the overhaul could also spell the departure of long-standing Premier 15s clubs who cannot meet the new minimums or compete with applicants with more resources, raising questions about maintaining regional representation and player pathways.

DMP Durham Sharks, the only side in the north east and one of few teams not affiliated with a Premiership club or university, were forced to turn to crowdfunding to save their 2022-23 season after a £50,000 shortfall threatened to curtail their campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search