Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How England got preparation all wrong – Andy Goode

By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail. England certainly failed to prepare for the effects of altitude at Ellis Park on Saturday and defeat in the first Test was the end result.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jamie George acknowledged after the game that it hit the players hard after the opening quarter, which makes defence coach Paul Gustard’s comments that “It didn’t affect them” and that “it didn’t even register” completely baffling. The effects were there for all to see.

I think South Africa got swept up in the emotion of the occasion in the opening 20 minutes and they were all over the shop but England did execute really well and were on the front foot with George Ford, in particular, pulling the strings.

If that Test match was anywhere else in the world, England probably wouldn’t have let a 21-point lead slip against South Africa but it was at Ellis Park and, as well as the fact that England haven’t won there for 46 years, altitude is an enormous factor.

I played there when I played for the Sharks and you do hit a wall after around 20 minutes. You get a burning sensation in your throat and it’s like you’re tasting blood.

I’d never played at altitude before when we went to face the Lions in Super Rugby and all the South African boys in the squad were warning me what it’d be like. They told me to warm up really hard but I was having none of it and it hit me after the opening quarter just as they said it would.

The pace I played at it didn’t make much difference but at international level it makes a real difference and we saw experienced players doing things you really wouldn’t expect them to.

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer

There were a lot of individual errors with star men like Mako Vunipola and Maro Itoje guilty of as many as anyone and you can say that it’s hard to legislate for that but there were system errors as well because England were being beaten down the short side at will and the coaches and players will have to take a hard look at all of that this week.

For me the biggest mistake though was in the preparation and not training at altitude.

You have to question why England have based themselves in Durban for this tour when they’re playing two of the Tests at altitude. Durban is a beautiful place, I lived there for three months and it’s the best place in South Africa at this time of year but it isn’t the best place to prepare for Test matches in Johannesburg and Bloemfontein.

If you’re playing the games at altitude, you absolutely have to be training at altitude as well. Only Eddie Jones and those in charge of organising this tour can answer why they’ve chosen to be based in Durban but it looks like a huge error of judgement.

The Free State Stadium in Bloemfontein isn’t quite as high as Ellis Park so it won’t hit England quite as ferociously and they’ll be more used to it after the weekend but the only way to prepare for it properly is to train at altitude in the week leading up to the Test and England aren’t doing that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eddie Jones has got a history of hooking players. He did it to Luther Burrell and Teimana Harrison and sometimes coaches should be praised for seeing the problem and being strong enough to take action quickly but it seemed harsh to take Nick Isiekwe off before half-time and plan B didn’t work.

I’m not sure how much Brad Shields has trained at second row but he’d been in camp less than a week and he’s brought on before half-time in an unfamiliar position and that exposes the policy of not having a recognised lock on the bench.

I hope lessons are learned from that and Shields is played in the back row this weekend. Tom Curry made 20 tackles and had a decent game but I think he needs a more destructive player alongside him on the other flank and I’d start Shields this week.

Chris Robshaw didn’t have any impact on the game at all and gave a penalty away at a key time. He still works hard but I don’t think he adds enough value nowadays when power and getting over the gainline is so important in the back row and I think the game is moving away from him.

Launchbury should be fit to return in the second row but I don’t see Eddie Jones making too many changes. Mike Brown finished his try really well and did some good things but made errors in defence because he isn’t a winger, so I still wouldn’t pick him there.

Likewise, Elliot Daly hasn’t started at full back for Wasps for over four years so I can understand why he’s seen as a good option there going forwards but it’s to be expected that he’ll make mistakes when he’s not used to playing there.

For all England’s failures, South Africa played some scintillating attacking rugby of their own and Rassie Erasmus deserves credit for bringing back Faf de Klerk and Willie le Roux, who have been strutting their stuff in the Premiership this season and were outstanding.

Video Spacer

He’s called up another Premiership star in Schalk Brits this week at the age of 37 and just as he is set to retire. That’ll seem strange to some but the rugby intellect that he can offer and a bit of inside knowledge on his Saracens colleagues as well could prove invaluable.

Why wouldn’t you do it? It’s a brilliant story and it’d be a fairytale ending to his career if he could come off the bench for his country one last time.

England will improve as a team this week without a doubt and there’s every chance that they’ll come out on top and take the series to a decider in Cape Town but the clouds hanging over this team and coaching staff are getting darker by the day and a win in Bloemfontein is now a necessity.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall' 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall'
Search