Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Altrad: Recent Montpellier bust-up, Cockerill's new role explained

(Photo by John Berry/Getty Images)

Montpellier president Mohed Altrad has looked back on his club’s failed season which involved two Test-level France players confronting title-winning boss Philippe Saint-Andre in the dressing room earlier this month.

ADVERTISEMENT

Defeat last Sunday to Pau meant that the 2021/22 French champions finished 11th on the table, nine points shy of Bordeaux in the sixth and final play-off spot.

However, what especially hurt Montpellier in their flawed title-retention bid was their May 6 home loss to Brive, the team that would go on to finish 14th and get relegated from the top flight. That defeat also prompted an altercation between Saint-Andre and French duo Mohamed Haouas and Paul Willemse.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The pair reportedly had very harsh dressing room words for Saint-Andre, but Altrad opted not to sanction the players and he has now explained why in an end-of-season review interview published on rugbyrama.fr. “I have a philosophy on this kind of thing,” he began.

“There are two types of management in life: hierarchical management, where one individual decides and the others remain silent, and matrix organisation, where the boss comes to decide a debate, a discussion, an exchange of various ideas that has taken place beforehand.

Related

“What Mohamed Haouas and Paul Willemse said that day in the locker room, they had the right to say. Willemse put the substance and form into it. Haouas put the substance, not the form. But I didn’t want to punish them because they had the right to express themselves and they were telling the truth.

“That day, I had to intervene so that these people did not come to blows. This is not my role, but this kind of thing is anticipated. The abscess should have been punctured before.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Last Sunday marked the final weekend of Saint-Andre being hands-on with the team in a daily capacity, Altrad explaining what the 2022 Top 14 title winner will be doing in 2023/24. “He will do what I don’t have time to do in the club, marketing, partner relations, representation in the LNR…

“It will also develop the connection between the training centre and the professional team. Philippe will also have a weekly meeting with the leading players to talk to them about the MHR institution, the history of the jersey… He will send this message: no one is above the institution.”

It was February 7, three days after England were beaten by Scotland in Steve Borthwick’s first game in charge, when it was confirmed that Cockerill would be leaving at the end of the Guinness Six Nations campaign for Montpellier.

At the time, it was stated that the Test-level assistant would become forwards coach at the club, but it has now been confirmed by Altrad that he will wield a far greater influence than just looking after the pack.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Richard Cockerill will be the sports boss, assisted by Jean-Baptiste Elissalde,” explained Altrad. “Cockerill will take care of the forwards. Benoit Paillaugue returns to the club and will take the place of Bruce Reihana: the return of Benoit will do us good.

“Character, he has it. He is a motivator, a facilitator. As for Benson Stanley (Clermont), he will take charge of the team’s defence. Richard, Jean-Baptiste and Philippe say a lot of good things.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search