Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

An ex-All Blacks fly-half has rated the 'bossing it' Marcus Smith

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Harlequins attack coach Nick Evans has claimed that last Saturday’s remarkable England draw with New Zealand can be the launching pad for Marcus Smith to start bossing the national team heading into next year’s Rugby World Cup in France. Smith had struggled to find the room to display his many talents until the final ten minutes at Twickenham on Saturday when a three-try burst allowed England to finish all-square with an All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 25-all outcome was evidence that the Harlequins No10 can play alongside Owen Farrell and that the positioning of the England captain at inside centre doesn’t need to hinder Smith’s natural attacking game.

Former All Blacks out-half Evans had been waiting for the 23-year-old Smith to transfer that kind of Harlequins performance to the Test arena. He said: “That showed what England can do and that is when you will get the best out of Marcus.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“The game fell Marcus’ way and he was playing what he sees. We coach that a lot here and when the game gets to the last quarter it does open up with unstructured footy and Marcus thrives in that situation. He gets himself on the ball and it looked like he was bossing it.”

Evans views Smith as the England quarterback and while Farrell possesses a stronger kicking game, the running part of the attack is where the youngster comes alive. He explained: ”Like an NFL quarterback your job in the final minutes is to go down the field and create a game-winning scenario and guys like Marcus can get you into that position.

Related

“That is what impressed me most because it was a tough game for Marcus and he had the ability to recognise a change in momentum and get himself onto the ball. There is more to come from him. That last ten minutes is something he can put into his back pocket and say, ‘I have been in this position before and rely on that experience’. When it comes to a World Cup semi-final or final he knows what that picture looks like. After the finish against the All Blacks, they [England] will all be on board with what Marcus can do.

“It was great to see him do the hitch kick and as soon as he did that and accelerate through the gap the team reacted. That is important because you suddenly saw people playing flatter and the point of attack moved quickly.”

ADVERTISEMENT

What was Evans’ view on Smith’s decision to kick the ball out of play to end the game and not try to win the contest with the final play? “At the end, teams have different scenarios in their locker and I’m sure they had their reasons for not keeping playing and you have to respect that. There is a lot more going on than people realise.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
d
dermot 763 days ago

He is good but not as good as English media make him out to be. This is big boy rugby and the little hop is fine for English soccer fans but belongs there and not on a rugby pitch.

J
Jérémie 763 days ago

Marcus Smith is not the problem, he's on his way of becomming world's best n°10. But it will be hard for him to play with dominated forwards.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 35 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 5 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'One of the deadliest wingers in rugby' has decided his future 'One of the deadliest wingers in rugby' has decided his future
Search