Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

An extra dose of 'uncertainty' is behind the changes to the REC

Merab Sharikadze. (Photo by Levan Verdzeuli/Getty Images)

Georgia may have once again entered the Rugby Europe Championship as short favourites to take out an unprecedented 12th title in 13 seasons of action, but there is one major hurdle they will have to overcome in 2023 that could freshen up the competition: knockout fixtures.

ADVERTISEMENT

Year after year, Los Leos have racked up the wins and taken home the crown at the end of the tournament – only Romania in 2017 have been able to upset the established order of proceedings. The last five Championships have all fallen the way of Georgia, however, a tier-two side who have now scored two wins over tier-one opposition in the space of 12 months, besting Italy in Batumi in July and then overcoming Wales at the Principality Stadium in November.

But while Georgia have rightfully started their campaign as title favourites and brushed aside Germany over the weekend to reinforce that tag, their nearest competitors will be licking their lips knowing that their odds of taking home the crown have increased significantly thanks to the revamped structure.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

The tournament has expanded this year to include eight teams – Georgia, Romania, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland and Germany – and in order to fit the competition into five rounds of action, a new format has been devised which sees the teams split across two groups for the opening three weekends. After the pool stages are completed, the top four sides will enter two rounds of sudden death action vying for the overall title, while the bottom four nations will engage in their own knockout fixtures. The action will culminate on March 19, with the top four sides playing in Spain and the bottom four heading to the Netherlands.

The new format means one bad game from Georgia – or perhaps one great game from one of their primary competitors – could see a new title-holder confirmed next month. According to Rugby Europe chief executive officer Florent Marty, that will make for a great competition.

“When you have the same winner for all the editions except one in the last decade or so, it’s not necessarily benefiting the uncertainty around the competition,” Marty says.

“Quite frankly, Georgia may still win – and of course we wish them the best of luck – but they will have to reach the final first and then will have to win the final.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And if you look at some of the global-stage competitions, starting with the World Cup, it’s a very similar format. You have a round-robin phase and then you have a knockout phase where everything is at stake. If you over underperform one day, you are out. And if you overperform one day, you can cause a big upset. That’s what we like about the new format.”

The decision to expand the competition was not one taken lightly, with discussions kicking off back in 2019. Consideration was given towards creating a marketable, exciting tournament, but also to growing the game in Europe.

Related

“We did a number of different workshops with the unions themselves to discuss different formats and different options,” says Marty.

“The decision to expand was absolutely unanimous because it’s obviously providing an opportunity for more teams to engage at that higher level.

ADVERTISEMENT

“For the format itself, there gas been various considerations, but there was a large consensus to actually introduce that knockout stage because it provides that uncertainty. It also provides an opportunity to stage larger and more appealing events; you’re going to have fans be able to attend a double leader in two different locations.”

According to Marty, the intention is to produce a festival-like atmosphere in Amsterdam and Badajoz, the destinations for the two final events, and create two new must-see experiences on the rugby calendar for fans in Europe.

“We want to start building something and grow it over the years,” he says. “We know it takes time, so we’re not going to have U2 performing at the finals in year one, for example. But the idea is, year by year, improve the quality of the foreign experience so it will become a must-attend for the fans.

“At the end of the day, everything we do is for the fans, so they need to get a lot of pleasure out of coming to those events, watch two great rugby games and also enjoy what’s around them, from the in-stadium experience to everything that is built around.”

While the new format – with pre-selected locations for the finals – could mean that some teams might play just one home game throughout the tournament, the distribution of matches will even out over a two-year cycle, with Marty confirming that next year’s competition will feature the same two pools as 2023’s iteration, but with home and away games reversed.

“Over a two-year period of time, (the new structure) has no effect on the number of home games,” he says. “The one uncertainty, obviously, is linked to a sporting aspect, which is you have to win the right to host a semi-final, which is an additional carrot from the round-robin phase.

“And then for the location of the finals, we plan to rotate, so it’s not like it will be necessarily the same union hosting it for a number of years.”

Related

The lowest-ranked side on aggregate over the two-year period will also automatically swap places with the top-ranked team from the Rugby Europe Trophy, with no promotion or relegation taking place at the end of the current tournament.

The ultimate goal of the competition, of course, remains bolstering the growing strength of rugby in Europe and recent results – including Georgia’s wins over tier-one opposition, suggest that goal is well and truly being met.

“Other than the traditional competitions, the Six Nations and Rugby Championship, we are the most represented competition at the World Cup,” Marty says. “We have three teams playing at the World Cup and I guess that’s the testimony to the value of the Rugby Europe Championship. Spain are clearly deserving as well, they were at the level of the other teams.

“So we can be proud about the level of the Rugby Europe Championship and at some point, and this is clearly something we also would encourage – we would hope that the World Cup would expand at some point so that there are more teams playing at the World Cup, and clearly what we want is to build team more teams to be ready to play at that level.”

The second and third rounds of this year’s Rugby Europe Championship will take place over the following two weeks, before all teams get a two-week rest. The knockout stages of the competition will kick off in early March.

ADVERTISEMENT

Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo vs Kubota Spears | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Final | Full Match Replay

Saitama Wild Knights vs Kobe Steelers | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 Bronze Final | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 42 | Investec Champions Cup Final Review

Spain's Incredible Rugby Sevens Journey to the World Championship Final | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 14

Australia vs USA | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

New Zealand vs Canada | Pacific Four Series 2025 | Full Match Replay

South Africa vs New Zealand | The Rugby Championship U20's | Full Match Replay

The Game that Made Jonah Lomu

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
N
Nikoloz 849 days ago

"Quite frankly, Georgia may still win – and of course we wish them the best of luck – but they will have to reach the final first and then will have to win the final." - don't u worry, we'll get there and win the final

.... let's speak after, about this

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tommy B. 49 minutes ago
Rassie Erasmus wades into heated debate over Jaden Hendrikse antics

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

I’ll go with one more because it’s so funny but then I must stop. There’s only so long you can talk to the nutter on the bus.

There is no legal impediment in the GFA to ANY form of border. It’s mentioned very briefly and ambiguously but even then there’s a caveat ‘if the security situation permits’ which is decided by the British government as the border is an internationally, UN recognised formal border between sovereign states. Now, you can argue that this is because it was assumed it would always be in the EU context - but we all know the issue with ‘assumption’. As to your hilarious drivel about what you think is in the GFA, you clearly haven’t read it or at best not understood it. There are still 1,580 British Army troops in NI. The legal status of NI as part of the UK is unchanged.

So, there was a problem for those that wanted to use the border to complicate any future British government changing regulations and trade arrangements through domestic legislation. Hence ‘hard border’ became ANYTHING that wasn’t a totally open border.

This allowed the EU and their fanatical Remainer British counterparts to imply that any form of administration AT the border was a ‘hard border.’ Soldiers with machine guns? Hard border. Old bloke with clipboard checking the load of every 200th lorry? Hard border. Anything in between? Hard Border. They could then use Gerry’s implicit threats to any ‘border officials’ to ensure that there would be an unique arrangement so that if any future parliament tried to change trade or administrative regulations for any part of the UK (which the EU was very worried about) some fanatical Remainer MP could stand up and say - ‘this complicates the situation in NI.’

You’ve just had a free lesson in the complex politics that went WAY over your head at the time. You’re welcome.

Now, I must slowly back out of the room, and bid you good day, as you’re clearly a nutter.

584 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Wallace Sititi drops to bench, Quinn Tupaea ruled out for Chiefs Wallace Sititi drops to bench for Chiefs vs Blues
Search