Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'An historic moment': World Rugby confirms major rugby calendar reform

The All Blacks perform the Haka at Tickenham. Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images

With the Rugby World Cup final just days away, World Rugby has confirmed some exciting changes to the men’s and women’s international rugby calendars which has been described as the “most significant” reform since the sport went professional.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a statement released by the sport’s governing body on Tuesday, World Rugby revealed major reform which includes dedicated women’s and men’s calendars for the first time.

Among the changes in the women’s game, World Rugby will continue to review the global calendar “on an ongoing basis” as they continue to recognise “that fast-evolving environment and opportunity.”

Knockout

New Zealand
South Africa
11 - 12
Final
Argentina
New Zealand
6 - 44
SF1
England
South Africa
15 - 16
SF2
Wales
Argentina
17 - 29
QF1
Ireland
New Zealand
24 - 28
QF2
England
Fiji
30 - 24
QF3
France
South Africa
28 - 29
QF4

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The World Rugby Council has also approved a new international competition in the men’s game which is sure to pique the interest of fans. Played in the July and November international windows, the best teams from both hemispheres will go head-to-head.

This new-look global competition will feature both Six Nations and Rugby Championship sides, as well as two further unions to be selected by SANZAAR. A second division run by World Rugby will be made up of 12 teams with promotion and relegation will commence from 2030.

“The World Rugby Council has approved transformational reform of the global men’s and women’s rugby calendars, a seminal moment for the sport that marks a new era of opportunity, certainty and growth for the game, a fitting finale to its 200th birthday year,” the World Rugby statement reads,

“Reform of Regulation 9 governing international player release has paved the way for the global club and international game to complement each other with clearly defined windows of release for international duties, as well as enhanced player welfare outcomes in the form of Player Load Guidelines.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Shaped through close collaboration with the players and stakeholders from across the whole sport, including domestic and international competitions, regions, unions, the adjustments have been driven by a game-wide commitment to prioritise player welfare while supporting desired competitiveness increases across performance unions.

“In the women’s game, the decision means clearly defined global and regional player release periods for the first time with no domestic competition overlap, opening the way to a harmonious structure that promotes opportunity and growth ahead of an expanded 16-team Rugby World Cup in 2025.

“In the men’s game, new competition structures coupled with an increased level of cross-over fixtures between the high performance and performance unions, will deliver long-term certainty of content for the first time, supporting increases in competitiveness, interest and value ahead of a landmark Rugby World Cup in the USA in 2031.

“Together, these developments crucially allow for better management of player load and overall welfare in the game, with the development of new Player Load Guidelines and ongoing expert input to oversee the development and evolution of the guidelines working with all stakeholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

The statement continues below.

First-ever global calendar for women’s rugby with dedicated release windows

  • First-ever dedicated international release windows (regional release window of seven weeks and global release window of eight weeks) from 2025.
  • Clarity of release periods for club/league and cross-border competitions, to allow certainty of planning and investment.
  • A commitment to more effectively manage player load and welfare in the fast-evolving women’s game, working with all stakeholders
  • A framework to review the women’s global calendar and international competition structures on an ongoing basis to recognise that fast-evolving environment and opportunity.

First-ever global calendar for men’s rugby with new competitions and increased opportunity

  • Establishment of an enhanced global calendar for men’s rugby with clearer international windows, including confirmation of the release window for Rugby World Cup 2027 (Australia)
  • Expansion of Rugby World Cup to 24 teams in 2027, providing more qualification opportunities for more teams and regional competitions.
  • Launch of a bi-annual new international competition from 2026, comprising a top division of 12 teams (Six Nations unions, SANZAAR unions and two further unions to be selected via a process run by SANZAAR), and a second division run by World Rugby of 12 teams with promotion and relegation commencing from 2030. Played in the July and November international release windows, it will provide crucial opportunities (and certainty of fixtures) for unions currently outside of the existing annual competitions, and in turn provide opportunities for unions and regional associations through to the second division.
  • The competition provides players and fans with compelling matches, to build audiences and value for all.
  • A significant uplift in the number of cross-over matches between unions in the respective
  • divisions are included in the global calendar in the two other years, providing performance nations with annual competition certainty against high performance unions.
  • Launch of new annual expanded Pacific Nations Cup competition in 2024, featuring Canada, Fiji, Japan, Samoa, Tonga and USA with home fixtures and Japan and USA alternating as finals hosts, guaranteeing a minimum of three additional matches a year in addition to the new international competition and cross-over fixtures. The global men’s calendar provides additional clarity for elite league and cross-border

According to the statement, the announcement “follows extensive consultation with the professional game, including regions, unions, domestic and international competitions, and detailed evaluation of the playing, commercial and fan landscape.”

World Rugby Chairman Sir Bill Beaumont described the reform as a “historic moment.”

“It is fitting that we finish Rugby World Cup 2023, the sports’ greatest celebration of togetherness, with the sport’s greatest feat of togetherness,” Beaumont said in the statement.

“Agreement on the men’s and women’s global calendars and their content is the most significant development in the sport since the game went professional. An historic moment for our sport that sets up collectively for success.

“We now look forward to an exciting new era for our sport commencing in 2025 (women) and 2026 (men). An era that will bring certainty and opportunity for all. An era that will support the many, not the few, and an era that will supercharge the development of the sport beyond its traditional and often self-imposed boundaries.

“I would like to thank all my colleagues for their spirit of collaboration. Today, we have achieved something special.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

31 Comments
P
Poe 423 days ago

I don't suppose they did anything on residency qualifications to prevent national teams fielding 40% bought in talent?

P
Poe 423 days ago

Interested to see how the money works out. If any of it trickles south.

W
Willie 424 days ago

Turning World Rugby Administration into a global structure will do more good than tinkering at the edges with a new competition.
Too much control by too few for far too long!

E
Emery Ambrose 424 days ago

Well we will have to see how it goes I guess, I hope there’s some crossover tours in the years between with 2nd teir teams.

F
FM 424 days ago

Ok, so 6 nations V the South. Always looking after 6 nations. Why on earth is Italy, and for that matter Scotland comfortably tucked into this? Why didn’t WR agree on a relegation/promotion into the 6 nations for the so-called 2nd tier nations in the north? Oh, dear, we cannot possibly upset the cigar smoking port drinkers, can we!

B
Barry 424 days ago

Open draw? SH v NH only? Who deicides home and away fixtures? Can we finally now get rid of the Lions tours? I’d have preferred a 16 team world cup over the same time period. Don’t understand how widening the net will improve standards.

j
johnz 424 days ago

Does relegation extend to the top league or just the second division. That would be interesting. Who would be the first tier one nation to go down? Wales? Australia? Italy?

O
Owen 424 days ago

The World League will kill the game

S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 424 days ago

This does absolutely nothing to help us develop the game here in Bulgaria, according to my knowledgeable friends Wivbin Kuntidraitov and Pezantsz Legdova

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 37 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search