Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: Why the Blues need to play Rieko Ioane at 13

Reiko Analysis 2

Superstar Rieko Ioane put up a decent stat line in the Blues agonising 41-34 defeat against the Highlanders last week– 75 run metres on 12 carries, with five defenders beaten and four clean breaks, showing flashes of his explosive talent.

ADVERTISEMENT

The stats might look pretty, but in reality, most of this came from counter-attack and generally very little from set-piece and only in specific circumstances in phase play.

When you look into this deeper the Blues are not using Ioane effectively, at least not to his maximum potential, and the Chiefs and every other team are going to thank them for it.

The Blues are going to run into real problems this year based on what we saw last Friday night and run the risk of wasting Ioane’s talent on the wing. Head coach Tana Umaga explained earlier this year his reasoning for leaving Ioane on the wing.

“I said to him it’s hard when he’s the world’s best left wing so it’s his own fault at the moment.

One key difference is missing here – the Blues are not the All Blacks. What Ioane does for the All Blacks on the wing cannot be expected at the Blues. The All Blacks create space for Ioane on the wing, the Blues don’t.

Blues problems run deep

What we learned against the Highlanders is the Blues are trying to play shockingly deep. This structure is going to hamper Ioane’s ability to get quality ball in space all season long during phase play.

ADVERTISEMENT
The Blues two receivers are set extremely deep on open side phase play.

The depth in itself isn’t the problem. The issues develop when the Blues backs remain static and pass directly backward instead of flat and ‘out in front’ of the player. This starts with Gatland at 10 and exacerbates as the play goes on.

The starting depth combined with deeper passing results in huge gain line losses for the Blues.

Here Gatland’s catch’n’pass is almost in the same spot and Collins is not much better. By the time Collins receives the ball, the play is already 13 metres behind the gain line.

Michael Collins is roughly 13 metres behind the gain line when he receives the pass.
ADVERTISEMENT

The Highlanders rush defence is able to sprint up as there are really no flat options for the Blues.

By the time Sonny Bill Williams receives the ball, Rob Thompson is in his face and is able to tackle him for a 15-metre loss.

SBW is smashed by Rob Thompson for a 15 metre loss.

Sonny Bill Williams is almost stationary when he receives the ball meaning Rieko Ioane outside of him also has to stop. If Williams offloads, Ioane would be standing still with Walden (12) closing in.

Again, we see Gatland passing deep to Collins far behind the gain line and the decoy runners nowhere near the advancing defensive line as viable options.

Another deep set up resulting in a massive gain line loss.

Once Matt Duffy (14) receives the ball he is monstered by Tevita Li (11) for another big loss.

Matt Duffie is hammered by Tevita Li well behind the gain line.
Gatland releases the ball as the Highlanders defence line closes in.

Here again, none of the backs have moved off their mark and Gatland has already released his pass.

The next man is under so much pressure by the time he receives it he has to fling it on awkwardly. George Moala and Sonny Bill Williams are standing still outside him, with zero momentum.

The clunky pass is fired above Williams’ head and Tevita Li is easily able to cover the overlap.

Going backwards – the Blues backs lose more metres on another wide shift.

We have seen in recent years when sides try to play with a ‘game managing’ 10, they fall back into this type of deep structure, which only results in disaster.

The Reds with Jake McIntyre tried the same thing and were cannon fodder for teams with rapid line speed. You cannot stand still and shovel wide to your weapons.

The Blues are looking to employ similar tactics but will find it extremely difficult against all the New Zealand sides that all adopt vicious rush tactics. Even if they are able to successfully spread the ball to Ioane, he will often be static and 15 metres behind the gain line.

Gatland was far more promising in the first half when he attacked the line and played on the run instead of the ‘stand and shovel’ pass that developed as the game went on.

The Blues deep attack is usually limited to when they try to release the open side. Their short side is generally much flatter, and this is where they found success on numerous occasions against the Highlanders.

Video Spacer

Ioane might be world’s best wing, but is Moala a better centre?

George Moala is a run-dominant player – which is a nicer way of saying he doesn’t pass the ball often.

There is a reason why Moala is no longer in contention for the All Blacks. Younger more rounded centres like Jack Goodhue have surpassed him. He is obviously capable of passing the ball as seen in the try above, but often misses opportunities to utilise space on the outside when he is covered, favouring contact instead.

Moala has an opportunity to spread the ball to the open Rieko Ioane.

The Blues have a lineout play inside the Highlanders 22 early in the match and Moala finds himself pressured by Rob Thompson as he receives the ball. With two men outside him, quick hands by Moala could release Ioane for a try scoring opportunity.

Waisake Naholo (14) is trying to close the outside space but is angling in. If Moala can get the ball to Collins, he will already be outside of Naholo giving the Blues a massive scoring opportunity.

Moala takes the ball into contact and is easily covered by the Highlanders.

Moala tries to take on Thompson on the outside and is swallowed by the Highlanders cover defence.

Again right before halftime, Moala has an opportunity down the short side to play numbers and free up Ioane inside the 22.

Moala has another opportunity to set Ioane free.

He engages his opposite forcing Naholo to cover two players. All that is required is a simple pass and the next man can free Ioane.

He takes it into contact and the opportunity is lost.

George Moala is swallowed by two Highlanders defenders.

Without a ball-playing 13, Ioane is going to have limited opportunities on the end of the Blues backline. When you have the deadliest player on the field and don’t use him enough, the missed opportunities add up in a game only decided by 7 points.

The one set-piece play Ioane was used on was a simple crash ball running off 9. There was no creative play design to use Ioane in wider channels. This stunning play by the All Blacks created space for him outside the centre channel and he took advantage.

Video Spacer

The All Blacks create space for Ioane, the Blues don’t.

The case for 13

The reasoning above argues that Ioane will be wasted on the wing this year but doesn’t outline the benefits the Blues will get from actually having Ioane at centre. Without going into too much detail, these are fairly obvious.

He will have the opportunity to get more touches on both sides of the field. We saw Ioane’s freakish offload in the lead up to Matt Duffie’s try on the right-hand side of the field. There is no reason why he couldn’t provide more of that in the 13 jersey.

He has the ball-skills Moala doesn’t, plus the speed and breakaway ability. He will draw in more attention from defenders but has the ability to capitalise on it – by getting away offloads in the tackle. George Moala would actually benefit more being outside Ioane.

The Blues have depth issues in attack, but having the dangerous Ioane there could still work. Even under pressure, he will be a better chance at shaking off the first defender and opening something up.

The move will benefit both Ioane and Moala, and ultimately the Blues. They must do what is best for them.

Ioane is the world’s best wing because he is in the world’s best team – the All Blacks.

The Blues aren’t, they need him at 13.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search