Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: The Highlanders are the masters of chaos

Their methods revolve around creating as many destabilised situations as possible, putting the defence in scramble mode with the most diverse attacking kicking game in the competition.

Not much has changed with the Highlanders following the appointment of Aaron Mauger as their new head coach – they still play the same way, and are still finding success.

ADVERTISEMENT

The side has compiled a 3-1 record and look firmly in contention for the New Zealand conference despite losing to the Hurricanes last weekend.

Their methods revolve around creating as many destabilised situations as possible, putting the defence in scramble mode with the most diverse attacking kicking game in the competition.

The new midfield pairing of Teihorangi Walden and Rob Thompson has the Highlanders kicking game on steroids – another two legitimate kicking options which they use as unexpected changeups to Smith and Sopoaga. It doesn’t matter where the Highlanders are on the field, they have a play in every situation revolved around putting boot to ball.

Surprisingly though, they kick 20% less than the top kicking side – the Rebels. They come in at number five of sides that kick the most. It’s not the volume of kicking, it’s how they are kicking that is has become renown with the Highlanders style of play.

Smith’s box kicking

It’s uncanny how many of Aaron Smith’s box kicks result in Highlanders regaining possession – either through the contest or by opposition error. The clinical halfback drops the ball on a pinpoint despite flirting with the touchline and rarely is the hoist non-contestable.

The Highlanders will clear their lines if they are deep inside their 22, but if not, they will work into a position on the 15m tramlines for a Smith box kick.

ADVERTISEMENT
One phase back to the 15m tramlines to set up a box kick.

 

 

 

 

The box kick puts up contestable possession in the middle third of the field, which at the very least still releases pressure but enables the Highlanders to potentially regain possession.

The kick-chase work of the Highlanders back three is integral to this tactic, and with aerial specialists like Ben Smith, it is not a low percentage play. They provide the pressure and often will force an opposition error.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Landers Playground

The middle third of the field is where the Highlanders kicking game diversifies. They will utilise every type of short-to-mid range kick in this zone – chips, grubbers and bombs to keep the game in a constant state of flux.

The middle zone where the Highlanders short range kicking game comes to life.

They may play two or three phases before using one of three short kicking options – Lima Sopoaga, Teihorangi Walden or Rob Thompson, to test the cover defence by putting the ball back in the air or on the ground.

Lima Sopoaga tries a chip kick for Rob Thompson to chase.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rob Thompson puts a grubber kick through against the Hurricanes.
Teihorangi Walden looks to grubber through the Stormers defence.
Rob Thompson grubber kicks against the Stormers.

The fact the Highlanders have up to five legitimate kicking options (Aaron Smith, Sopoaga, Walden, Thompson and even Ben Smith) keeps the opposition guessing where the kick will come from. Using centre Rob Thompson, in particular, entices the wingers to come up to the line opening up space in behind.

The opposition is constantly scrambling backward and the back three are put under the spotlight to cover and clean up the loose ball frequently.

First phase kicking

In addition to a jester’s box of general phase kicking, the Highlanders kick the most of any team directly from set piece outside of their own 22.

Most of their set-piece plays are variations of this formation, which allows them to disguise certain kicks.

The formation the Highlanders run the majority of the time from a set-piece.

 

 

 

 

Their base formation starts with a flat midfield. With Smith’s mastery of precise long passing, they use a flat skip pass to the second receiver to take a hit up and Lima Sopoaga wraps around as a backdoor option.

Thompson takes a hit up out of the Highlanders common formation.

Here is the same play with a slight variation with Walden (12) and Thompson (13) switching roles.

This basic crash play is used in a number of situations such as their two-phase exit – Walden or Thompson will set up the ruck from which Smith will clear from the base into touch.

Walden receives direct from Smith, while Sopoaga loops around the back. Walden will set the ruck for a Smith clearance.

It is also used as the foundation of their attack in other areas of the field.

As the four players involved in this formation are all legitimate kicking options, the Highlanders can run a number of variations of the play with attacking kicks built in.

Walden and Thompson usually run hard straight lines in this formation but when they become kick chasers the defence isn’t immediately aware of what’s happening.

Smith runs off the back of the lineout maul and Walden and Thompson run their normal lines. Smith opts to chip the ball over off his left foot while the midfielders at full pace glide through with ease in pursuit of the kick.

Walden and Thompson chase through unblocked in pursuit of the balll.

A fortuitous bounce allows Michael Collins to clean up a dangerous situation.

Later in the match, we see the same formation from a scrum, this time with fullback Ben Smith also on a sweep line and with Thompson and Walden switching positions again.

The Blues are catfished when Thompson puts in an unexpected chip kick over the top. Pulu is unable to secure the bouncing ball for the Blues and it sits up perfectly for Walden who scores a crucial try for the Highlanders.

George Moala and Rieko Ioane look on as Rob Thompson puts a chip kick over the line.

 

The Highlanders also run a number of two-phase strikes from this formation when Walden or Thompson are simply used as crash runners. The Highlanders will set up in the middle before using Smith’s ruck speed to run a switch play. Using such a variety of plays from the same look helps keep the opposition guessing.

This has become the foundation on which the Highlanders are building their set-piece attack from and allows them to incorporate many of their kicking principles – get the ball in the air or on the ground as much as they can. They have only scratched the surface with the number of ways they can attack from this formation. Expect the Highlanders to integrate the Sopoaga back-door option as the season goes on, which brings into play his cross-field kicking.

The constant peppering of short kicks and guessing game the Highlanders play creates chaos under which the men from the deep south thrive. The Chiefs back three will have to be on their game as head coach Aaron Mauger alluded to not being happy with where the game was played against the Hurricanes – only 39% territory in the opposition half.

Expect a barrage of toe action on Friday night.

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW Another Black Ferns Sevens star signs with Warriors in NRLW
Search