Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: How Leinster exploited Wasps' forwards on James Lowe’s breakaway set-piece try

Leinster Analysis

Leinster are the current masters of line running and deception, continually coming up with new concepts and finding ways to create opportunities for players like ex-pat Kiwi James Lowe.

ADVERTISEMENT

In their Champions Cup opener against Wasps, they opened the second half by scoring directly from a first phase play, opening up a lane for Lowe who torched Wasps for a 50-metre try which put them 21-3 ahead.

The play they used was a variation of a common concept – using a screen pass before feeding the blindside winger back inside.

What makes this version interesting is how they create the mismatch they want by using a 5-man lineout, forcing Wasps to cover the loose forward runners in the midfield with their own forwards, which Leinster then used against them.

Wasps have switched up their lineout defence, using their halfback as the hooker and their open side as the halfback, meaning their actual hooker is defending out somewhere in the backline.

ADVERTISEMENT

Using the 5-man lineout has dispersed Leinster’s loose forwards, and they have set up with two strong ball carriers, Josh van der Flier (7) and Jack Conan (8) outside Johnny Sexton in a box formation with two backs in behind.

To counter-act the potential midfield crash, Wasps have Nizaam Carr (8) and hooker Tommy Taylor (2) as the interior midfield defence.

Wasps are missing Sopoaga’s presence inside Carr, meaning Wasps are ripe for manipulation in this area.

Carr has to monitor both Sexton and van de Flier, trusting inside help to take Sexton, while Taylor has Conan as a first assignment with Robbie Henshaw (12) and James Lowe (11) looming in behind.

ADVERTISEMENT

There should be alarm bells ringing with so many Leinster players in such close proximity. Both Carr and Taylor are bigger, slower players and more importantly, have limited experience defending in the backline from set-piece.

One of the most difficult jobs in defence for a back is set-piece, so sending a front-rower to do it is a tough ask. Throw in a missing flyhalf and you might as well give a team like Leinster five points.

Leinster will exploit this disadvantage in personnel and experience, executing their play perfectly.

Van de Flier and Conan hold the inside defence by running lines slightly angled against the grain.

Wasps inside defenders Carr and Taylor are locked in on their first reads, and Taylor in particular, bites and prepares to tackle his first assessed target Conan.

Sexton releases the pass to Henshaw out the back. There is plenty of time for Taylor to adjust but he commits to tackling Conan without the ball, which now puts Leinster’s play in motion to open up a hole.

Henshaw bouncing out ‘pulls’ Wasps inside centre Michael Le Bourgeois (12) with him, opening up the lane for Lowe between Le Bourgeois and Taylor.

With Lowe running at full clip, Taylor cannot recover from a stationary position too far inside. The rest of the Wasps inside defence have to find a way around Leinster’s traffic, so also cannot assist.

Taylor has been isolated one-on-one with the faster Lowe and without body-on-body alignment, can do nothing to stop him breezing past.

Lowe is one of the most dangerous open-field runners in the game, with power and offloading skills to keep any movement going.

He is able to hold off the Wasps defence by looking for support and fend off a last-ditch tackle attempt by Elliot Daly to score next to the posts.

Could Wasps have done anything differently?

They were already at a disadvantage being a man-down but the question has to be asked whether Tommy Taylor was the best man to station out in the midfield, and secondly, should they have split the two forwards instead of playing them side-by-side?

Only Wasps will know the right answer with inside knowledge of all their forwards’ measurables. There must have been enough trust to use the hooker as a midfield defender instead of openside Thomas Young, but they paid the price for doing so as Leinster were clever enough to exploit it.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 16 minutes ago
'Ulster, though no one wants to admit it, isn't much more than a development province right now.'

“I’d love to know the relevant numbers of who comes into professionalism from a club, say as an adult, versus early means like say pathway programmes “


Not sure where you would get that information, JW. But your question piqued my interest, and I looked at the background of some Ulster players. If you are interested/have the time, look at the Wiki site for Ulster rugby, and scroll down to the current squad, where you can then click on the individual players, and often there is good info. on their pathway to Ulster squad.


Not many come in from the AIL teams directly. Robert Baloucoune came from Enniskillen into the Ulster setup, but that was after he played Sevens for Ireland. Big standout missed in his school years is Stuart McCloskey, who never played for an age group team, and it was only after he showed good form playing for AIL team Dungannon, that he was eventually added late to Ulster Academy.


“I’m just thinking ahead. You know Ireland is going to come into the same predicament Aus is at where that next group of youngsters waiting to come into programmes get picked off by the French”


That is not happening with top young players in Ireland. I can’t think of a single example of one that has gone to a French club, or to any other country. But as you say, it could happen in the future.


What has happened to a limited extent is established Irish players moving offshore, but they are few. Jonathan Sexton had a spell with Racing in France…not very successful. Simon Zebo also went over to Racing. Trevor Brennan went to Toulouse, stayed there too, with his sons now playing in France, one at Toulouse, one at Toulon. And more recently the two tens, Joey Carbery to Bordueax, and Ben Healy to Edinburgh.


“I see they’ve near completed a double round robin worth of games, does that mean theres not much left in their season?”


The season finishes around mid April. Schools finish on St Patrick’s Day, 17 th Match. When I lived in Ireland, we had a few Sevens tournaments post season. But never as big a thing as in the Scottish Borders, where the short game was “invented”.

44 Go to comments
P
Poorfour 1 hour ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

9 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Steve Meehan: 'If you start winning, it’s amazing what effect it has on all fans.' Steve Meehan: 'If you start winning, it’s amazing what effect it has on all fans.'
Search