Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: Leon MacDonald's new system at the Blues may require new parts to reach optimalisation

The Blues have become competitive in the New Zealand conference but how do they make the next step? (Photos/Gettys Images)

The Blues came back to Earth with a close 33-29 loss over rivals the Chiefs, extending an 8-year dry spell against their southern neighbours. The loss ended a four-match winning streak for the rising Blues, who are improving under the guidance of first-year head coach Leon MacDonald.

ADVERTISEMENT

So, what has MacDonald done since taking over and what do they need to do to become a contender again?

Shark attack

The ex-Tasman head coach has brought his system with him, and after a cautious start, the Blues are now playing with the shape that he used with the Makos.

The Blues are now running an ‘unbalanced’ 1-3-2-1-1 pattern as their main phase play structure. This may sound confusing but the key element is the middle ‘3-2’ pod configuration, which is visible below.

Early against the Chiefs, we see the Blues shape falling into place rather accurately.

The first three-man pod is setting up for a carry with Otere Black (10) in the back seat, and for the next phase, a central two-man pod with Ma’a Nonu (12) out the back.

On this occasion, two Blues loose forwards, Tom Robinson (6) and Dalton Papali’i (7) flank the right edge either side of Caleb Clarke (14). Often this will just be one, and it is common to see No. 8 Akira Ioane where Robinson is.

ADVERTISEMENT

After the first pod carries, a large open side play has been set-up for the Blues to attack with width on the second phase the same way, with Otere Black sliding over to play first receiver.

On this occasion, the Blues use a little screen pass play from the two-man pod, first hitting the closest forward Patrick Tuipulotu who plays a pullback pass to Nonu (12) coming around the edge before using hands to the sideline.

In just two phases the Blues have moved from one side to the other, getting far more players involved and using a higher number of passes to do so.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, just a few minutes later and still within the first 10 minutes of the match, the Blues struggle to hold their shape effectively. This is the Blues after the first pod carry, setting up for the same second-phase open side shift.

Nonu (12) and Black (10) trade places in a first receiver change-up, but the two-man pod set up outside of Nonu is sloppy.

Tuipulotu is frontrunning him, the second forward, Gerard Cowley-Tuioti, is late into position, and both locks fail to time their run, ending up in front of Nonu by the time he catches the ball.

They aren’t able to offer options on this phase or even the look of being involved, making it easy for the defence to slide once Black receives the ball.

The Blues are still able to spread to the edge through the hands by playing with more depth and make easy metres downfield once the ball reaches the far side, so the poor setup has no real impact in this exit play.

Black’s depth is also far too deep to challenge the line in any capacity, but since the Blues can still achieve gain line if they get the ball wide quickly, also isn’t a major problem on this occasion.

The problem is this lack of clinical execution surfaces when the Blues need to be accurate in their shape in other parts of the field, a sign that poor habits pop up everywhere.

As Matt Duffie explained recently with brutal honesty with Stuff, the recent run of improved results were a result of “no individual bull****” and no “falling out of our shape when fatigued”.

Against the Chiefs, the fatigue set in again and despite having an astounding 63% possession, the Blues failed to outscore the Chiefs.

Early in the second half, Karl Tu’inukuafe (1) takes a carry, but his support options on either side aren’t really there, too slow to react and miss an opportunity for a tip pass on the outside.

Tu’inukuafe engages two defenders and takes them to the ground, and the lane outside for a potential tip pass prior to contact is visible.

When Tuipulotu gets his timing right, the skilled ball-playing of Tu’inukuafe can set him free, as illustrated on the stroke of halftime when some great forward interplay opened up the Chiefs and ultimately led to a try to Melani Nanai. The trouble is the consistency at which this happens.

After this opportunity is missed, the two ‘latchers’ reach the breakdown late and Parsons makes a bad clean and goes off his feet unnecessarily.

Later in the game, he is crucially penalised for doing the same thing while the Blues have the ball and the turnover of possession leads to a crucial Chiefs try to extend the lead by two scores.

The Blues play back to the short side and make in-roads, setting up the shape again to return to the open side with front-foot ball.

The Blues have failed to setup the first pod effectively, losing all resemblance of structure. The halfback feeds Black directly while the half-completed pod switches off for a rest once Black receives the ball.

Tuipulotu is not in a position to be a tip runner outside of Parsons, but tries to make up for it by offering a late running option for  Black out of the second level.

He is able to provide a strong carry, but a man from the next two-man pod has to break ranks to offer cleaning support with neither Parsons or Tu’inukuafe available. The Blues have begun operating outside the instructed manual and it falls apart quickly.

Tuipulotu tries to throw a one-hand offload around the corner and loses the ball. The Chiefs regain possession and clear their lines through Marty McKenzie, and the Blues lose an opportunity deep on attack inside the 22.

Just as the Blues were rolling and gaining momentum, the pack falls out of shape and Tuipulotu tries to do something extra after failing to do his initial job.

Despite going off-script, had the Blues re-cycled this ball their backs would still be in a promising position to capitalise.

This is all too familiar from the Blues tight five who frequently quit on plays, take phases off to rest, fail to get the timing or positioning right or just make critical errors, unable to play at the game speed required to open up space for the backs in New Zealand derbies.

Re-building the pack

Macdonald’s system needs fit, mobile forwards with a certain level of ball-playing ability. Some of the Blues tight five fill some of the criteria but lack in others, and many constantly hurt the team with poor execution and work rate.

They have re-signed some elder statesmen like Parsons and Tuipulotu at a time where, respectfully, they should be looking to replace them. World-class locks and hookers don’t grow on trees but this is one area where, if the Blues got recruitment right in the next two years, their team could really lift to the next level with improved accuracy in support lines and cleaning in phase play.

Parsons is throwing at 83.3% success rate for the Blues lineout, similar to Dane Coles at the Hurricanes (83.6%) which has well-documented set-piece troubles, but below that of Liam Coltman 86.2%, Nathan Harris 87.5%, and the Crusaders pair of Andrew Makalio 90.2% and Ben Funnel 93.6%.

Lineout success requires more input than just the thrower, but it’s clear the Blues set-piece isn’t firing at the rate required by a genuine contender (90%+), and the whole tight five has a large say in that through two jumping options and the lifters.

They have a serviceable tight five unit full of size and power, but they don’t provide an elite level of set-piece execution and hurt the team’s attacking prowess within ball-in-hand in a system that promotes ball movement and less carrying. The case for continued rejuvenation couldn’t be clearer.

The emergence of Tom Robinson has uncovered a gem prospect, as has been the addition of St Kents and New Zealand age grade rep Dalton Papalii, who bring energy and high effort around the park and will hopefully develop into sharpened readers of the game. The loose forward depth is becoming a real asset and can be something the team builds around in the next few years.

The ability of Akira Ioane is well known, but the Blues will have succession planning issues to work around – the son of local legend Michael Jones, Niko Jones, is a No. 8 who will be Super Rugby-ready by age 20 or 21. If Akira is still around, which is likely, Jones will need to play seven or six and compete with Papalii, Robinson, and Gibson or be used as a super-sub bench utility for impact.

There is going to a talent jam in the stacked loose forward unit while the real problem exists up front.

Finding an All Black-quality hooker should be high on the Blues priority. Wellington signed last year’s New Zealand schoolboy Tyrone Thompson out of Napier, and under-20 prospect Kianu Kereru-Symes out of Hawke’s Bay also covers prop.

Both of them will be waiting in the wings for Dane Coles to retire or whether Asafo Aumua fails to develop in order to get an opportunity at Super Rugby level.

Similarly, Codie Taylor and Andrew Makalio present roadblocks for Shilo Klien and already proven Super Rugby player Ben Funnel to assume regular starting duties with the Crusaders. They have to get active in this space to find a dynamic number 2, in the absence of a local prospect regarded as a national prospect in his age group, to push and learn from the 32-year-old Parsons in his final chapter with the team.

The challenge for the tight five re-committing and extending their time at the Blues is to find another level of accuracy, fitness and precision to prove they can take the side further towards championship-level play.

The team has improved to become competitive in the New Zealand conference, but in order to lead the team back to the promised land, they have to find a level of accuracy that makes this current level of play unacceptable, which, in all reality, isn’t for a team with championship aspirations.

They have come some way this far, but there is a way to go yet and the back half in the season will show whether it may take an investment in the next generation of the Blues tight five to do so. This is isn’t the only improvement area for the Blues, but you need to be able to lay a solid platform first, and that means putting the men up front under the spotlight.

Rugby World Cup city guide – Tokyo:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search