Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: The one passage of play that sums up the difference between the All Blacks and Wallabies

Bledisloe Cover

Another year, another lost Bledisloe campaign.

The Wallabies continue to look for answers after a 40-13 drubbing at the hands of the All Blacks at Eden Park last night. The problems were varied, although the lineout and scrum was far better this time around. They were killed on turnover ball once again, as the All Blacks ran wild in transition phases.

ADVERTISEMENT

While many are quick to jump and defend Michael Cheika and his coaching staff, there are visible and clear issues with their attacking play that proves to be ineffective.

The Wallabies run complex pre-set attacking waves from set-piece that can last up to five phases or more – it looks fancy but ends up doing next to nothing. There is a lot of pre-planned player movement, but a lack of substance makes it very easy to defend.

The automated, rigid nature of the telegraphed plays they run don’t challenge the defence and the passing is too deep to deceive anyone – as soon as one player throws the ball back deep to the next, the defence can just slide and swallow up the runner, often behind the gain line.

Pressure never builds enough to break down the defence, and inversely it’s the Wallabies who lose any semblance of shape by running scripted play after play without getting into a balanced pattern.

Nothing illustrates this better than the passage of play at a pivotal moment, right before halftime from a Wallabies attacking lineout.

On the first play, they run Dane Haylett-Petty on a cut after a screen pass from Bernard Foley to Kurtley Beale. The first thing to process is the depth the players receive the ball from.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Beale feeds Haylett-Petty underneath without challenging any All Blacks defenders. Reece Hodge, who ran a dummy line, hasn’t reached the defensive line yet which begs the question, what was the point of his angle and line? No defenders are drawn into contact. He hasn’t created any indecision at all, and might as well have stood still on the play to conserve energy.

Beale releases the ball back inside, still metres from the defensive line and all the All Blacks have to to do is make a front-on tackle on Haylett-Petty. The Wallabies progress through the move with unnecessary complexity when a simple midfield crash would yield the same result.

The next phase sees the first forward runners coming around the corner. Adam Coleman is coming from a depth of nearly 8.5 metres to take a carry, whilst Foley, Beale and Michael Hooper wait even deeper for a scripted third phase play.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lukhan Tui stands alone on the wing on the far side, with half a field between him and the next player. If Coleman spills the ball in contact, the All Blacks could theoretically move the ball left to attack this space and catch the Wallabies struggling to cover.

Just on that picture alone, you can see why the All Blacks are scoring a ton of points from turnover ball against them. These elaborate pre-planned plays after multiple phases offer vast areas of space to attack.

On the next phase Will Genia picks up the ball and has a short runner in close with Alaalatoa (3), but his backdoor option Foley is extremely deep. He is at least 10 metres away from the defensive line.

The defender has enough time to cover Alaalatoa, realise he’s not getting the ball and then slide back to cover Foley out the back. It’s really easy pickings.

Genia’s pass has to be deep to reach Foley, and the All Blacks defence will have plenty of time to process his inside runners, Beale and Hooper. Space is actually developing on the edge, but the Wallabies go through the motions of their multi-phase set play and Foley tries to attack the line.

Recieiving from such depth, Foley is an easy target and is hammered by Sam Cane as Hooper and Beale end up in a tangled mess. He retains possession and the Wallabies move to the edge with Tui to start a new pattern.

The same issues persist in every play – the depth of passing and the failure to challenge the All Blacks defence with legitimate running options. The final runner has the ball so early the Wallabies have done the All Blacks’ work for them – they don’t even need to read what player to tackle.

This has either been instructed by coaches, been failed to be identified by coaches as a problem, or it has been talked about and the players are unable to correct it. It is likely to be one of the first two reasons because when players don’t do what the coaches tell them, they usually get replaced by someone who does.

In the same possession but a few phases later, Foley again runs a scripted inside ball to Hodge, releasing the pass without committing a defender. He is going through the motions of the planned play and doesn’t even think to fire a long ball out to the unmarked Marika Koroibete, where the space is.

After eight phases, the Wallabies have made good metres but have mustered a whole lot of nothing, tiring themselves out with ridiculous running from deep. On the next phase, Beale coughs the ball up and this happens one phase later.

Video Spacer

Simple draw and pass skills and moving the ball to the space. It’s a planned strategy to attack off turnover ball, but more of a framework to operate within. The players can play what’s in front of them and make their own decisions.

The Wallabies tire themselves out with unnecessary, poorly designed play, turn the ball over and the All Blacks beat them with simple skills (draw and pass) and principles (attack space).

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall' 'England's blanket of despair feels overdone - they are not a team in freefall'
Search