Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: How the Reds need to use the Tongan Thor

Tongan Thor Taniela Tupou

When the 18-year-old Sacred Heart College prop went viral in 2014, it was the sheer fascination of a 130kg front rower tearing a team apart returning kicks that captured everyone’s imagination.

ADVERTISEMENT

Taniela Tupou was such a unique prospect. He has the speed of an outside back and the power of two loose forwards. However, his first full season of Super Rugby in 2017 didn’t bear much fruit. Understandably, it has taken time for Tupou to develop into a Super Rugby level prop, which has impatient fans writing him off too soon.

Going to the Reds, one of the worst teams in Super Rugby also didn’t help. Last year they did not use him the way he needs to be used. The more situations in which he can wind up amplifies the amount of damage he can cause.

The Reds under Brad Thorn this year have shown a willingness to open up the playbook and find more ways to unleash the power of Thor. Here’s what they have done and how they can unlock Tupou’s potential.

Set-piece

One of the areas where Tupou has been underutilised as a ball-carrying option is the set piece.

As he is tied up with scrummaging duties every time they pack down, the lineout is the only scenario where he can be used in this capacity. Just using him as a lifter like a regular prop misses an opportunity to get the ball in his hands.

The Reds have used a number of 4-man and 5-man lineout packages to allow Tupou to be placed in the back line. Their typical setup is three ball carriers outside 10 for a midfield crash.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here the Reds have Tupou as the second running option outside 10, and below as the first running option. They run a 1-2 cut as if Tupou was playing inside centre.

The preference for the Reds has been to use the attention Tupou receives to work other players into the game.

A common tactic when Tupou is set as the second option is to run a screen pass behind him to the free Caleb Timu (6) wrapping out the back. This, unfortunately, results in fewer carries for him, and the pass is often delivered too early to be effective for Timu.

ADVERTISEMENT

In other situations, we see Tupou start wider and become part of the second phase after the crash ball. Below, Kerevi (12) takes the hit-up.

Tupou often goes unused as a decoy or simply not the preferred carrier on the second phase. On this occasion above he ends up cleaning for Timu (6).

The Reds have started to show more intent by involving Tupou off the lineout but prefer to use him as a decoy. The majority of lineout plays for the Reds set a midfield ruck, with either one of the forward carriers or Kerevi. There has been no desire to use Tupou wider directly off the lineout or find more complex ways to create space for him.

The team seems committed to one-dimensional crash plays to reset pattern or look to run little switch plays from. This is an area of the game that the Reds will hopefully continue to open up and look to integrate Tupou to maximise his ball-carrying opportunities.

Phase Play

 Thorn’s 1-3-3-1 system is not a well-tuned machine yet. A number of the young and experienced forwards find themselves over-committing to rucks leaving the team short after a few phases. The pattern falls apart fairly quickly, stalling the Reds attack.

Here there are at least four Reds players at the ruck with no Brumbies contesting. The Reds first phase looks fine but the setup for the next is shaky. Tupou the edge forward will have to move in. This is a common occurrence when reviewing Reds phase play.

When they do fall into the pattern, Tupou finds himself often looking for a tip pass running off the lead runner, which tends to be withheld by the ball carrier.

 

 

Edge havoc

The flashes of ‘Thor’ we have seen from Tupou this season is when the Reds get the pattern right and he is afforded space on the edge as the one forward positioned out there.

He has been damaging down the tramlines often committing multiple defenders and freeing up his outside support.

Tupou rampaging down the left-hand side puts Henry Speight into the turf with a fend.
A nice touch puts Timu away for a try against the Bulls after committing the defence.

The full Thor experience

For Tupou to become the attacking superpower he could be the Reds have to generate decent ball to him on the flanks, maximise and his lineout carries and consider one crazy (good kinda crazy) option – releasing Tupou on counter-attack.

It’s where he has made such an impact at all levels or rugby so far but has yet to be seen in Super Rugby. A number of teams sometimes use their Number 8 in some capacity in this role, so it’s not so farfetched to put Tupou in these situations.

Holding Tupou back in situations where the opposition is in exit mode and using quick lineouts to release him will put fear in the hearts of every winger on kick coverage duties. Tupou averages the second most tackle breaks of any prop, third most line breaks, but only carries five times a game (10th for all props).

If they can increase that to 10-12 carries a game (in the right situations) they will have the most damaging forward in Super Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 9 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search