Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: The Crusaders' playbook with Will Jordan has unlimited home run potential

Will Jordan of the Crusaders. (Photos/Gettys Images)

Tasman’s 20-year-old fullback Will Jordan has been elevated to the Crusaders’ starting line-up and he hasn’t missed a beat, bringing his form from Mitre 10 Cup with him into Super Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

The emerging star gives the already-potent Crusader backline a breakaway threat with ‘home run’ potential from any set-piece platform, which showed against the Chiefs as he clocked up 98-metres on two line breaks, six defenders beaten and two tries, one of which came directly from set-piece.

The Crusaders attack has been gradually increasing the number of misdirection plays they are running off these platforms, having players ‘scram’ in multiple directions to create initial indecision.

Their lineout plays in the red zone, in particular, have evolved into a bamboozling range of strikes using the hooker on a ‘swing’ route after the throw and employing misdirection concepts out of the maul to create a lot of confusing animation for the defence.

These ‘smokescreens’ are freeing up space for damaging threats like Will Jordan.

This stack play from a scrum uses a double-bluff to put Jordan in an ocean of space down the middle by faking left, going right and coming back inside to prey on the Chiefs’ understrength back row. It’s a clever misdirection play designed to get mismatches between a fullback and loose forwards, illustrated below by St Michael’s College in Ireland.

Video Spacer

The Crusaders ran the exact same play above, using a 2-2 split on either side with a 2-man stack directly behind the scrum containing Richie Mo’unga (10) and Will Jordan (15).

ADVERTISEMENT

On this occasion, Richie Mo’unga is the first man in the stack to reveal his hand, pushing off to the blind side as Ere Enari (9) runs an 8-9 to the open side. Mo’unga’s dummy line will hopefully pull Chiefs halfback Brad Weber and members of the back row his way to create more isolation on the open side.

The stack causes issues with the pre-play defensive alignment of the Chiefs, with the first defenders on either side of the scrum defending space, not any particular man. On the open side, Damian McKenzie is positioned defending no one but space.

This can lead to two players taking the same man as they try to decipher which runners to take, which happens here as this play develops.

ADVERTISEMENT

From the 8-9, Enari plays Ryan Crotty (12) to the open side and chases the ball on a wrap-line with Number 8 Whetu Douglas (8).

Only Lachlan Boshier (7) of the Chiefs has a decent break from the back of the scrum for the Chiefs. Taleni Seu (8) is still stationary which will create problems. As Boshier pushes wider in pursuit of Enari, he will only widen the gap for the incoming Jordan on the inside.

Boshier (7) and McKenzie (10) have both pursued Crotty while Jordan is able to explode onto the inside ball and expose the soft underbelly of the Chiefs’ back row.

He races away downfield before stepping inside the cover defence of Solomon Alaimalo and scores in the tackle of the next defender.

The damage Jordan can cause in open space was evident against the Queensland Reds on his starting debut, with his searing pace scorching the Suncorp turf in an impressive showing. The combination of his speed and line running nous adds another dimension to the Crusaders backline that has untold amounts of potential.

If there was a missing element to their backs, Jordan brings it. A hole-running fullback with burning speed, he will have a field day this season outside centre Jack Goodhue and playmakers like Richie Mo’unga when he is on the field.

He will have to compete in the rotation with David Havili, George Bridge, Manasa Mataele, Braydon Ennor, Israel Dagg, and Sevu Reece for game time, while 19-year-old Leicester Fainga’anuku and 20-year-old Ngani Punivai are age grade talents waiting to get a sniff in. The depth in the back three for the Crusaders is so good it should be illegal.

The Crusaders have gotten stronger this season with the introduction of their next generation of players, all of whom were produced through their system after being ID’d in various places. They all seem to have adapted to this level like fish to water, showing that this Crusaders’ dynasty still has a long runway ahead.

The addition of Will Jordan gives the Crusaders attack a dynamic fullback that increases the likelihood of any set-piece being a ‘one-phase’ strike, should they call plays with the intention of trying to score. With their shiny new toy in the 15 jersey, expect to see many more ‘home-run’ opportunities.

This is the last thing every other Super Rugby team trying to topple the back-to-back champions wanted to see, but the Crusaders have found new pieces to keep this team firing.

Brad Mooar ahead of Highlanders’ derby:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Poorfour 54 minutes ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

So “it wasn’t foul play because it wasn’t foul play” is - to you - not only an acceptable answer but the only possible answer?


I would hope that the definition of foul play is clear enough that they can say “that wasn’t foul play - even though it resulted in a serious injury - because although player A did not wrap with the right arm, he entered the ruck through the gate and from a legal angle at a legal height, and was supporting his own weight until player B entered the ruck behind him and pushed him onto player C’s leg” or “that wasn’t foul play although players D and E picked player F out of a ruck, tipped him upside down and dropped him on his shoulder because reasons.”


Referees sometimes offer a clear explanation, especially when in discussion with the TMO, but they don’t always, especially for incidents that aren’t reviewed on field. It’s also a recognised flaw in the bunker system that there isn’t an explanation of the card decisions - I’d personally prefer the bunker to prepare a short package of the best angles and play back to the ref their reasoning, with the ref having the final say, like an enhanced TMO. It would cost a few more seconds, but would help the crowd to understand.


Greater clarity carries with it risks - not least that if the subsequent feedback is at odds with the ref’s decision they run the risk of harassment on social media - but rugby is really struggling to show that it can manage these decisions consistently, and offering a clear explanation after the fact would help to ensure better consistency in officiating in future.

9 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ How to solve a problem like Welsh rugby How to solve a problem like Welsh rugby
Search