Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: The lineout attack inspired by an old school trick play taking over Super Rugby

The Crusaders are pioneering a trend in lineout attack. (Photos/Gettys Images)

Each year new trends surface and become wildly adopted as new ideas are proven to be effective. This year, the hottest trend is lineout plays inspired by principles from an old school trick set play, and the team pioneering this type of lineout attack the most is the Crusaders.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Crusaders’ lineout attack inside the opposition 22 has become a confusing and complex puzzle for the defence to solve, using the same concepts found in ‘The Wall’ – a set-piece play to disguise the true ball carrier.

This play is used from a penalty tap kick, using a line of forwards with their backs turned to the defence forming a wall.

The halfback passes the ball to the wall while a number of players run lines in a multitude of directions around the wall to create confusion and disguise the true recipient.

The Crusaders have adopted the same principles at lineout, using the maul as the perfect tool to ‘hide’ the ball and use the hooker on a slingshot line to bring another running option into play.

ADVERTISEMENT

The play starts with a two-man stack including the halfback and winger 10 metres behind the lineout. The openside flanker plays halfback at the lineout, selling the maul to the defence.

The maul is formed and the openside Matt Todd (7) peels around to feed a flying hooker, Andrew Makalio (2), coming around the corner. The first man from the stack, Bryn Hall (9) breaks to the blind side to attract attention the other way.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dane Coles (2) sights Makalio coming around the corner and breaks off the maul to chase, which begins to open up a gap on the inside for the second man in the stack, Manasa Mataele (14).

Mataele throws his arms up in exasperation as he is running into an open hole as Makalio carries wider instead of turning in and committing Coles.

He still has an opportunity to play Mataele with a late offload but it goes astray with an open line begging. Late in the game, they pull the same play out but this time the reserves finish it off.


This time the blind side decoy of Mitch Drummond (21) baits Wes Goosen (14) and a number of Hurricanes’ players to break away to the blind, opening up a two-on-one for Ben Funnell (16) to play George Bridge (11) on the inside against Du’Plessis Kirifi (7).

Kirifi does a great job of covering both options, holding off to make a tackle on Bridge but its too close to the line and Bridge is able to score through contact.

The play succeeded on isolated Kirifi with a two-on-one in short space, as Goosen took the short side bait.

Against the Lions early in the second half, the Crusaders score with the same slingshot play.

Crucial on this occasion is how the tail of the Crusaders lineout collapse in to ‘manufacture’ a maul, with Joe Moody (1) trapping Kwagga Smith to open up the hole. Another Lions forward next to Smith joins willfully at the precise moment the ball is released.

Codie Taylor is steaming around the corner with Bridge in his back pocket and has the edge sealed by Moody, running directly at Elton Jantjies, who has no inside help, in the 10 channel.

Taylor takes the easy option and plays Bridge early who is able to go over unobstructed. By the time Smith is released by Moody, it’s too late. With his hips turned out and falling in the opposite direction, he isn’t going to get there, while the Lions never had the blindside winger in position to defend that channel.

With dynamic athletes like Codie Taylor and Andrew Makalio who possess crafty ball-handling skills, these plays cause untold amounts of problems when they successfully isolate the barnstorming front rowers on little men in the inside backs.

They can either take the contact with the size advantage in an attempt to crash over or use their deft passing to play the winger off the hip. Often space is there to play the pass and bag an easy try.

The Crusaders have shown a variety of plays using the maul as a guise to release runners with the location of the ball hidden behind the congregation of players.

At this lineout, Sevu Reece (14) sets up at the front seemingly as a typical bailout option you often see with halfbacks.

The Crusaders throw to the middle and do in fact set up the rolling maul. Both Codie Taylor (2) and Sevu Reece (14) join at the back while Ere Enari (9) resumes duties in a normal halfback position.

After stalling, Enari breaks to the open side on what looks like a truck and trailer 8-9 type of play. Codie Taylor breaks away with him playing the 8 role, which pulls Brad Weber across.

Reece is the actual ball carrier and breaks off to the blind side which now has 20 metres of width. With the Chiefs pack still in the process of disengaging from the maul, they aren’t aware that he has the ball.

Luckily for the Chiefs, rookie winger Etene Nanai-Seturo isn’t also drawn across with Weber, and is able to defend the blind side space but the Crusaders create an isolated 1-on-1 matchup for Reece.

Nanai-Seturo is up to the task on this occasion, bringing him down in the tackle, but if the Crusaders can find a way to leave another man on the blind side, a 2-on-1 could be a different story.

The Brumbies also came up with a cleverly designed play using similar principles to target the Jaguares down the blind side where a 1-on-1 matchup was created.

Using ‘animation’ around the maul to create confusion and trickery is becoming widely adopted this season in Super Rugby and there is no team that is doing this is effectively or frequently as the Crusaders after refining it over the last couple of seasons.

It’s this type of continual innovation, even with old ideas, that keeps them ahead of everyone else.

NZR re-sign Richie Mo’unga:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future
Search