Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: The Wallabies have reached the peak of delusion

Wallabies cover

Trying to speak things into existence can be seen as having unwavering faith or complete delusion depending on how you look at it. For the Wallabies and Rugby Australia, this is what they have resorted to, and this is the perspective they must realise.

ADVERTISEMENT

As the ship sinks, they continue to see the mast protruding through the water’s surface and speak of its ability to hold the sail. Never mind the completely submerged hull.

This ship is only going to go to one place, no matter what you want to say.

Michael Cheika and Michael Hooper have reached the peak of this delusion, optimistically speaking of ‘good footy’, ‘improvement’ and ‘opportunities not taken’ in their post-match press conference after the recent defeat against the Springboks. Whether they hold different opinions in private is unknown, but it’s time to stop with this nonsense in public.

The Wallabies are in a state, a bad one, and this isn’t going to be fixed anytime soon.

They are so far behind it is sad to see. This team doesn’t resemble anything close to an elite professional rugby team, lacking simple draw and pass skills, handling skills, cleaning out skills, line running, the conditioning levels required of some positional units (specifically the tight five), not to mention a shared cognitive understanding of what they are trying to do.

Video Spacer

It’s not the losing, it’s how they are losing.

If you want to ignore the processes that make up a rugby game and fail to understand why they are so bad, just accept that a loss is a loss and continue to wonder why this keeps happening. If you want to take the red pill so to speak, continue on.

We detailed just how much the All Blacks have evolved since the last World Cup here, cutting out inefficiency during phase play by implementing advanced, organised patterns to counteract zero ruck strategies and improved defence. This found efficiency with numbers in attack enabling them to throw more complexity at the opposition.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ireland have also mastered this style of play and this has been, in part, reflected in their rise to number two in the world rankings. This Wallabies team doesn’t have any idea how to run the 1-3-3-1 pattern they are trying to, effectively playing pre-2015 rugby.

How many Wallabies does it take it clear a ruck? Six, apparently. Throw in a seventh guy to pass the ball for good measure.

This is all you need to see to know the Wallabies have no idea what is happening on each phase, with no understanding of the system in place to methodically break down a defence and retain possession like a clinical team.

ADVERTISEMENT

The collective rugby IQ of this team is close to zero. It is effectively a bunch of headless chooks, frantically scrambling around with no idea how to function as a unit. When you add in the sub-standard skills it becomes a complete dumpster fire.

This is what happens on the next phase. With seven players involved in the last ruck, Dane Haylett-Petty takes a run into the teeth of the Springbok forwards with no support.

The three closest players are South Africa’s loose forwards. No award for guessing what happens next, Haylett-Petty is penalised for holding on.

This is isn’t a one-off occurrence, at nearly every ruck there are ‘ruck inspectors’, guys who have no clue as to what they should be doing and have come to have a good look at the breakdown. Hand out the clipboards and hardhats.

The lack of any organised play inevitably leads to aimless kicking to try and find some stability, at the expense of keeping the ball in hand.

Cheika talks of how his team plays attacking rugby and how they throw the ball around. It’s disorganised rugby. It’s amateur rugby. It’s dumb rugby. The Wallabies whip the ball around but are so technically poor in so many areas that it’s dysfunctional, and most of the time it amounts to nothing before they kick the ball away.

You can find problems on literally every phase.

A simple carry by Adam Coleman (5) starts with a sloppy setup. Izack Rodda (4) is in front of the ball carrier, ruling out an inside tip and Ned Hanigan (6) is running to the outside but isn’t in sync with him.

Coleman isn’t looking to pass and Hanigan overruns him expecting it, leaving himself with a poor angle for the clean out. Rodda has assisted on the tackle for the Springboks, running into Coleman from the side. He will end up on the ground with the ball carrier giving South Africa a chance to contest the ball in a comical botch-up.

Here we see Wallabies hooker Folau Fainga’a setting up and calling for a carry. Despite being about five metres too deep, halfback Will Genia fires an unexpected ball to Scott Sio on his left.

It’s nothing short of shambolic, yet the captain and coach preach about how this is good footy and how they are proud of the efforts of the players. They are either delusional or lying, one of the two.

Australia is now seventh in the world rugby rankings – their worst ever ranking – three spots ahead of Fiji, a union with 1/100 of the resources of Rugby Australia. This is effectively rock bottom for a two-time World Champion.

This situation requires drastic action but the good thing is, being at or near rock bottom means you can make massive changes without too much pain – it’s pretty hard to get worse.

All courses of action need to be on the table for Rugby Australia, even the most extreme of measures.

Over half of the current Wallabies team would have a market value of approximately $15,000-$30,000 in New Zealand, the world’s number one team, equivalent to what they would make for a Mitre 10 Cup team. A few would be lucky to even make that cut.

Rugby Australia can afford to let eighty percent of these players walk to take up overseas contracts and continue to get the same results they are getting now. Should they do this? It is extreme but this is a dire situation, freeing up cash that can be deployed for a rebuild.

Here is the reality check for Australia’s professional players – when you are marginally better than Fiji as a team, you shouldn’t be getting paid anywhere near six figures. The Fijian national players sure don’t.

The only two worth paying big contracts for are David Pocock, who continues to be the only world-class player in the team, and Israel Folau, who has world-class athleticism and could be shaped into a better player with coaching. Everyone else is expendable. Everyone else.

One of the arguments for keeping Cheika on is a lack of suitable candidates to replace him. Whilst firing Cheika won’t immediately turn around the results, it is clear the current coaches are unable to take this squad any further.

In a previous generation, Australian coaches like Cheika make the pilgrimage to the Northern Hemisphere to impart their knowledge. Now the time has come for the reverse to happen, Rugby Australia needs to look for Europe’s best and could do worse than looking to Ireland who have built the world’s second-best team from the provincial level up.

Cheika is a passionate man who bleeds green and gold, and you know he will be the last man on board, committed to the very end. He has publicly stated he will step down as coach if the Wallabies don’t win the World Cup, so that gives Rugby Australia roughly 12 months to plan for a successor.

At all levels Rugby Australia has failed and needs to consider hitting the reset button, rebuilding from the ground up, and unfortunately, there will be collateral damage.

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search