Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: Is Tom Curry the answer to England's openside problem?

Tom Curry

The England number 7 jersey has resembled a game of musical chairs under the stewardship of Eddie Jones. It has been the most unsettled position as Jones tinkers with solutions to find the right balance of his pack.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ever since he took the role as England’s head coach he has been vocal about not requiring a specialist openside flanker, stating he sees the requirements of the role differently from a traditional hunter. First and foremost, securing possession off first phase, and quickly, is of utmost importance. This explains why he has opted for big-bodied blindsides who might be superior at cleaning out instead of a natural fetcher type.

The South Africa series saw a number of experiments by Jones, including trialing a specialist 7 for the entire series – young 20-year-old Tom Curry. His selection in all three tests is a clear indication Jones wants to move away from a back-row based on size and power alone, to one with more mobility and the potential to create multiple turnovers.

Against South Africa in the third test, Curry was raw but enthusiastic. His execution of England’s attacking patterns was not quite there but his high work rate around the park in defence and during transition plays gave England a lift in the treacherous conditions.

When conditions are wet and slippery, kicking plays an overbearing part of the game. The transition plays between attack and defence are crucial for an openside, both in recovery work to secure possession and kick chase pressure. Curry did well to secure rucks and offered some counter-attacking running lanes off the ball for England’s return game.

Here as Mike Brown (11) returns the ball, Curry is retreating with his opposite number Pieter-Steph du Toit. Brown is not in an ideal position for Curry to help, he is on the inside shoulder giving du Toit the best leverage. However, Owen Farrell (12) on the outside presents an opportunity to exploit the gap between du Toit and Jesse Kriel. Curry can keep it open with some legal shielding.

ADVERTISEMENT

As the play develops Mike Brown doesn’t pass, du Toit slips underneath Curry and puts England under pressure by swallowing Brown. Curry’s positioning was accurate anticipating wider movement but Brown’s decision to hold was left wanting when space presented for Farrell.

Later in the half Nathan Hughes (8) prepares to return a kick with Curry again jostling with Du Toit for position.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Du Toit slips underneath Curry again, but in the slippery conditions he is pushed off his line just enough for Hughes to make a half-break. Hughes offloads to Brown and Curry looms in support but the ball is dislodged from Brown’s hands.

In defence, he got through 14 tackles filling the C gap a lot in phase play and playing a halfback role at the lineout as Cipriani’s inside protection, solidifying the 9-10 channel. He made two outstanding dominant one-on-one tackles on Andre Esterhuizen coming off set-piece.

 

He managed to win a turnover with pure upper body strength, holding up Siya Kolisi enough for a collapsed maul on a play that South Africa sent down the 9-10 channel. He won another in traditional fetcher fashion in the first half, striking an isolated opponent and forcing a holding on penalty.

 

His impact on the game in defence was outstanding but it was other areas that will be a concern for Jones. He made a couple of mental errors when used as a running option outside 10 and was technically amiss at times as a primary cleanout option.

Above is a common attack formation used outside Cipriani that Curry frequently occupies. On one occasion he stuck an outstretched hand for a pass that was intended for his outside man leading to a knock-on and on another he botched a running line, causing an obstruction which was fortunately not called by the referee.

 

Curry’s technique at the cleanout area was a worry at times, often losing his footing too early and heading to ground with his teammate, sealing off the ball and taking himself out of play giving the opposition a crack at the ball.

Below Curry is on the ground, on top of his teammate with the Springbok forwards given a prime opportunity to contest the ball. This sometimes requires others to commit to the ruck that weren’t initially planning to do so. In the second example, Owen Farrell bails out Curry by coming in to clean out Kolisi.

His cleanout work in the match was inconsistent and sometimes completely illegal, taking side entries on multiple occasions and failing to release the tackled opponent, which he was lucky to be not penalised for. This is a fine line to toe and if he can get away with it consistently then kudos to him but could cost the side if policed properly.

Below South Africa’s loose forwards complete a dominant tackle on Nathan Hughes, driving him backward. Curry, having overshot the mark, has to track back and enters from the side illegally to clean.

At just 20-years-old Curry is showing plenty of promise to retain his spot in the England squad. His work rate is phenomenal and a real asset to the team. His recovery work and off-the-ball line running is great – as he grows in size he will be more effective at holding his weight in those situations as well as becoming a bigger nuisance at the breakdown which is an obvious strength.

He will have to clean up a few technical areas but the risk is worth the upside for England, already proving he can win turnovers against a daunting Springbok pack. Defensively he is reliable and can bring pressure with his line speed and his high aerobic capacity gives the side extra mobility.

Tom Curry could just be Eddie Jones long-term answer at 7.

 

 

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search