Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Analysis: Where the All Blacks will target England

Where the All Blacks will target England. (Photos/Gettys Images)

England’s tense 12-11 victory over the Springboks was won on the back of four Owen Farrell penalties and keeping the visitors to just one try.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although they held the Springboks to just 11 points, a side that has troubled the All Blacks recently, the Boks performance at Twickenham left a lot to be desired.

South Africa’s attacking shapes were poor, with a lack of cohesion for a side missing two of its best players in Faf de Klerk and Willie le Roux. They missed untold amounts of opportunities to attack England on the edge and often fell out of structures too easily.

This weekend the All Blacks will be a much bigger test for England, with far more organized and clinical play, flatter structures and a more efficient passing game from 1-to-15.

On review of England’s defensive processes against the Springboks, this is where the All Blacks will look to attack.

All Blacks will want a Te’o-Slade midfield again

The All Blacks will definitely want to see another Ben Te’o-Henry Slade midfield combination. The two were disconnected against the Springboks, out-of-sync and playing two different styles of defence.

Henry Slade at outside centre played a high-pressure game, rushing out of the line and blitzing his opposite, while inside centre Ben Te’o was on his heels and played a passive up-and-out defence or slide defence.

ADVERTISEMENT

This creates disconnection and a fragmented defensive line, with Slade coming out of the line in isolation, bringing opportunities for the attack to exploit.

On this attacking Springboks set-piece play, Henry Slade (13) flies out to pressure Jesse Kriel.

As the scrum breaks we can see the wide initial spacing between the midfielders.

Slade is already approaching top speed coming forward towards Kriel, while Te’o is drifting sideways playing non-committal slide defence.

ADVERTISEMENT

For some unknown reason, fullback Damian Willemse has taken himself out of the back line, dropping deep despite his side having the ball. If he had been up in the line, England would’ve been potentially in trouble on the edge.

As Pollard releases the pass, the gap between the two midfielders has closed but Te’o is ball-watching inside and drifting out, while Slade is almost a blur, illustrating the speed at which he is flying up towards Kriel.

Slade gets in Kriel’s face and has a chance to grab the intercept but the ball is lost in contact.

We also can see if Willemse was available outside Kriel, a slightly deeper and wider pass from Pollard may have created a two-on-one on the edge.

It is also entirely possible that Slade decides to blitz on this occasion as he is aware Willemse is not the line and England therefore have the numbers covered, but we can still find other instances of this happening when this is not the case.

Here during phase play, Slade rushes out while Te’o holds off and drifts. The ball carrier Kriel (13) cuts back sharply off the left, beating a sliding Te’o on the inside shoulder.

Owen Farrell has to cover inside to make up for Te’o’s miss, while we see support running lanes open up for both Williamse (15) and Eben Etzebeth (4) on the inside.

Farrell does a good job ensuring Kriel cannot get an offload away.

Compounding problems is the fact that both players seem to be prolific ball-watchers, Te’o especially, so when one of them loses track of their man the midfield channel opens up.

On this play Te’o creeps in on the forward runner before Pollard lays a beautiful pill on the chest of de Allende, exposing Te’o on his outside. Slade turns in to close the gap, leaving a lane for Kriel on his outside.

Damian De Allende (12) breaks free but trips over trying to run instead of offloading to Kriel running to his outside.

Replace Kriel or de Allende with Sonny Bill Williams and you can already predict what kind of problems the All Blacks will cause England with a Te’o-Slade midfield partnership.

With Williams working into space, drawing contact and freeing up his arm for the offload, the All Blacks will create a number of these opportunities.

The tendencies of each player can also be targeted with specific lines  –  for Te’o, a ball-watcher who drifts and for Slade, a ball-watcher who rushes.

Te’o’s eyes will be looking inward while his body will be drifting out. It will be possible to target him with runners across his face, coming from his blind spot right across into the 10-12 channel.

The sweet spot is close enough to him for a late, weak arms tackle, but far enough away from Farrell to make the line break and maintain speed.

In Slade’s case, they can use the ball across his face to beat him, with a fullback outside or centre bouncing out. Early ball from 10 to 12 before a skip ball to 15 would be one easy option to do this. Slade might pull in the intercept, but that will be the risk/reward for both teams and shapes as one cat and mouse battle to look out for.

The All Blacks will have seen the tape and can be excited about the opportunities to cause some damage by manipulating this midfield.

They can scheme to beat them with running lines or use the world-class offloading abilities of Sonny Bill to pray on England’s disconnected centres.

If Eddie Jones doesn’t change this pairing up, Sonny Bill Williams shapes to have a big game for the All Blacks.

In the second part, we will look at the edge defence of England and how they fold after set-piece, which presents more areas the All Blacks will target.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones Why England's defence of the realm has crumbled without Felix Jones
Search