Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Andrew Mehrtens on ‘the difference’ between All Blacks and Wallabies

Anton Lienert-Brown celebrates with Beauden Barrett of New Zealand during The Rugby Championship & Bledisloe Cup match between New Zealand All Blacks and Australia Wallabies at Sky Stadium on September 28, 2024 in Wellington, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Former New Zealand flyhalf Andrew Mehrtens has highlighted what he believes to be the difference between the All Blacks and Wallabies at the moment. The All Blacks successfully retained the Bledisloe Cup after beating their arch-rivals in back-to-back Tests.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the first Bledisloe Cup clash of the year, the All Blacks ran riot during the opening 15 minutes as Will Jordan, Rieko Ioane and Caleb Clarke all crossed for a try each. But the Wallabies, to their credit, wrestled their way back into the contest during the second half.

The All Blacks had two players sitting in the sin bin late but managed to hand on for a 31-28 win at Sydney’s Accor Stadium earlier this month. They backed up that effort with an improved performance at Wellington’s Sky Stadium last Saturday evening.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Australia landed the first blow with backrower Fraser McReight crossing for an early try. While the opening half was quite tense, the second term was one-way traffic as the New Zealanders snapped their hoodoo in the capital with a dominant 33-13 win.

While they lost three of their six matches, the All Blacks ended up finishing second on The Rugby Championship ladder behind only the Springboks. As for the Wallabies, they collected the wooden spoon after finishing with just one win – 20-19 over Argentina in La Plata.

“It wasn’t perfect for them tonight but they’ll be happy. That was a much-improved performance and a much more complete performance,” Mehrtens said on Stan Sports’ post-game coverage.

“They did have some players who really stood out and I think that was probably the difference at the end, just the quality of certain individual performances.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I thought Anton Lienert-Brown was outstanding for the All Blacks. Tupou Vaa’i, in attack and in defence, made some crunching hits.

“There were just those moments of brilliance that maybe the Wallabies lacked. Some of that’s team cohesion but some of that’s just the individual quality of players.”

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
2
5
Tries
1
4
Conversions
1
0
Drop Goals
0
155
Carries
143
9
Line Breaks
4
12
Turnovers Lost
15
9
Turnovers Won
5

The All Blacks were under a fair bit of pressure early on this Test and it looked that way early on as the visitors took control. McReight reaped the try-scoring reward of the Wallabies’ brilliant start but the men in black were able to recover.

Caleb Clarke scored with time up on the clock at the end of the first-half to give the All Blacks the lead. That was an advantage they wouldn’t surrender throughout the remaining 40-minute period that was still to come.

ADVERTISEMENT

Clarke sliced through the Wallabies’ defensive line with power, determination and ease – just as fullback Will Jordan had earlier in the half. The All Blacks’ tries were clinical so it wasn’t surprising to see them run away with a solid win later in the Test.

“They’ve got the confidence and they react well the All Blacks with support play,” Mehrtens explained.

“Then you’ve got, like I say, Will Jordan just breaking through one tackle, that’s all he needs. The All Blacks with all the possession and all the confidence really, they just kept the ball alive.

“The support play, getting around the player, providing options… there’s always someone ready to go.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
T
Teddy 82 days ago

It's the same difference as scratching your arse or tearing a hole in it.

B
Bull Shark 82 days ago

6 ranking positions?

D
DC000 82 days ago

The difference - the Aussies are utter 💩 and the ABs are an average team at best.


Pretty much encapsulates how vastly overrated SH rugby is in the past decade.

M
MattJH 82 days ago

You rage bait like Ireland play quarter finals.

B
BH 82 days ago

And yet two of the best teams in the world have been countries from the SH. And all 3 World Cups in the past decade have been won by SH teams. Lame comment!

O
OJohn 82 days ago

The difference is the All Blacks don't have an Australian coach cunningly trying to undermine and sabotage them while still living in Dubbo.

C
CR 82 days ago

Definitely not the coach. If it was the coach then Aussie teams would be winning/making finals in super.

M
MattJH 82 days ago

Whereas Australia do have a coach living in Dubbo that is undermining them?

Should be an easy fix in that case. Start by nuking Dubbo. No one who notices will mind.

F
Forward pass 82 days ago

So are you saying the Wallabies have a Australian coach cunningly trying to undermine and sabotage them whilst living in Dubbo?

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search