Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Andrew Mehrtens 'surprised' by unexpected weakness in Boks' display

Codie Taylor of New Zealand during the Castle Lager Rugby Championship match between South Africa and New Zealand at Emirates Airline Park on August 31, 2024 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo by Dirk Kotze/Gallo Images)

Though South Africa came away with a narrow 31-27 win over the All Blacks at Emirates Airline Park on Saturday, former New Zealand No10 Andrew Merhtens feels Scott Robertson’s side will be “taking a lot of positives” from their performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both sides will head into a rematch in Cape Town on Saturday with plenty of belief from what they produced in Johannesburg.

The world champions may have got the victory, but it was far from a convincing performance, particularly in the first half. It was actually a display that “surprised” Mehrtens, particularly with regard to the Springboks’ defence.

Video Spacer

Response to the pre-match Haka chaos at Ellis Park | RPTV

The Boks Office crew, joined by Andrew Mehrtens, discuss the performance of the Haka before facing South Africa. Watch the full episode on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Response to the pre-match Haka chaos at Ellis Park | RPTV

The Boks Office crew, joined by Andrew Mehrtens, discuss the performance of the Haka before facing South Africa. Watch the full episode on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

The All Blacks great was a guest on RugbyPass TV’s Boks Office this week, where he said the Springbok defence was “not as cohesive or robust as I expected”.

The Boks’ ferocious defence has been the foundation of their consecutive World Cup triumphs, but it was uncharacteristically porous against their arch-rivals in round three of the Rugby Championship. Caleb Clarke’s opening try was an example of how the All Blacks across the board were able to make ground easily, albeit from turnover ball.

Match Summary

4
Penalty Goals
1
3
Tries
4
2
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
106
Carries
100
3
Line Breaks
7
12
Turnovers Lost
15
7
Turnovers Won
3

But it was not just in the tight quarters that the Boks’ defence underachieved in Mehrtens’ eyes, but also their inability to stop the visitors spreading the ball wide.

“I was a bit surprised that the defence was not as cohesive or robust as I expected,” the 70-cap All Black said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“And that might just be the changes in players, the changes in roles or whatever. But the All Blacks were better at trying to punch holes against that defence than they were against Argentina, for example.

“They used stepping, Codie Taylor was a good example, rather than just thumping into the body, a bit of a step, get on a weak side and get a little bit past the contact zone. But I did feel South Africa wasn’t as tight in that defence as I expected and the All Blacks got a bit more go-forward a bit more easily than they might have anticipated.

“None of us expected the All Blacks to get around the outside of the Boks like they did. The best and most stable midfield in the world – [Damian] de Allende and [Jesse] Kriel – then you’ve got those fantastic wingers with all the pace and it’s been hard to get around the outside of the Boks. So the All Blacks did that really well. So they’ll be taking a lot of positives.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
J
JK 129 days ago

Like Rassie says 'take them to the gutter' when they try to 'take you to the dance floor'

l
lm 131 days ago

Positives like blowing a 10 point lead!. DMac going over time to kick conversions. Making wrong passing decisions. There are certainly positives. I feel NZ Rugby has dropped standards in a lot of ways and it has affected their game. Rebuild yes, but don't bloody take 30 years!

B
BE 131 days ago

AB's have always been the best team in the world ball in hand. The French when they have their tails up can rival them and the Welsh teams of old showed the way. The outcome of the game last week to me was a "non-result". Either team could have won and as a SA supporter I wouldn't have felt at all aggrieved by our performance, even if we lost. It was a typical SA vs AB's game, in the mood no defence can stop the AB's, in the mood our direct physical game does make teams wilt. Can't wait for this week

S
SK 131 days ago

Springboks conceded a try off turnover ball from a knock on in their half that went out the back and gifted the AB's an easy shift and score which the rush was powerless to resist. Then an intercept is impossible to defend against and a maul try was well worked by the All Blacks with a touch of truck and trailer there. The one try when they got around us was at set piece and that was unacceptable because it was first phase ball. There were several other occassions where they got around the rush but couldnt beat the cover. In the end the Boks gave away from soft tries. They will have to do better if they wanna win this week in CT

B
Boergundy 131 days ago

I agree. Two of the tries were not due to the ABs beating the Bok defence. The intercept for sure, the turnover after BJDs error was well exploited but the defence was disorganised at that point. The Boks should cut out those errors, in this game alone it resulted in 14 easy points to the opposition

B
Bull Shark 131 days ago

I wonder whether they were anticipating the dinks over the top of midfield, that kept the defense a bit narrow leaving them exposed when the All Blacks did go wide? That was my immediate thought.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 2 hours ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

Regarding the scrum, I would pick up on your point made below, Nick. "....reffing the scrum is not easy at all, prob the single most difficult area in the books." Those of us who have coached the scrum, and /or refereed, would fully agree. And I have read on the pages of rugby forums for years now the opinion of experienced international props. "I could not detect exactly what happened in that particular scrum"


Ofc the problem is heightened when the referee has not played in the pack, has never been in a scrum. It is very clear, at least to me, that many top level referees don't begin to understand the mechanics of the scrum.


I feel the laws are adequate as they stand to a great extent. The problem, as I see it, is that referees right up to top level just don't apply them in the the letter of the law or in the spirit they should .


Any significant downward pressure by a prop to cause a collapse should be penalised. For example look at the scrum clip at 54.49 mins. It is the Leinster LH who forces downwards first, then the Munster TH "pancakes" I believe the Leinster prop is the offender there.


I also think that with most of the wheels in those clips, it was Leinster who are the offenders. That can be hard to pick though in many cases. Another point is the hooker standing up. That was being penalised 3/4 years ago. So Kellaher would have been penalised back then in that first clip at 04.17.


I think the directive should be given now to referees at all levels to stop giving penalties simply because a team is being moved backwards. And the directive should be "order the team with the ball to clear it, and within 3 secs."


It would help if a change was made to remove the option to take another scrum after a penalty is awarded. Must take a tap or a kick.

48 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Salmaan Moerat: 'I’ve not really processed the magnitude of leading the Springboks' Salmaan Moerat: 'I’ve not really processed the magnitude of leading the Springboks'
Search