Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

JRFU deny Amanaki Mafi altercation

The Japan Rugby Football Union has denied rumours of a physical altercation involving No 8 Amanaki Mafi this year.

The Sydney Morning Herald revealed they were told the 28-year-old was involved in a physical altercation with a staff member while playing for Japan earlier this year.

Mafi has found himself in trouble recently, and is currently facing a serious assault charge after allegedly fighting former Rebels team-mate Lopeti Timani following their final fixture of the season in July. The charge carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment.

A JRFU spokeswoman said the earlier incident from June was not physical.

“Amanaki Lelei Mafi had a disagreement with one of our staffs, but clearly it was nothing violent,” she said.

“Head coach Jamie Joseph was able to manage the situation and the case was shared and settled among the team members and staff.”

Video Spacer

Mafi is coming off a stellar season for both Japan and the Rebels and looked to be a key piece of Japan’s Rugby World Cup campaign.

However, history tells us that Japanese rugby has a stern approach to off-field behaviour. Earlier this year former Wallabies captain George Smith was sacked following an alleged assault on a taxi driver.

Both the NTT Shining Arcs – Mafi’s Top League club in Japan – and the JRFU are waiting on the judicial process before deciding Mafi’s fate.

The Rebels – Mafi’s former Super Rugby club – this week announced an internal review of their “welfare and integrity framework” following Mafi and Timani’s altercation.

Just one week after Mafi and Timani’s alleged incident, Rebels rookies Hunter Paisami and Pone Fa’amausili were suspended indefinitely following their alleged involvement in an incident that left a man in hospital. Paisami was later charged and will face court in September.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search