Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'I couldn't sleep': Antoine Dupont felt 'injustice' with Kiwi ref Ben O'Keeffe

Antoine Dupont of France interacts with Referee Ben O’Keeffe during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 Quarter Final match between France and South Africa at Stade de France on October 15, 2023 in Paris, France. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

France’s star scrumhalf Antoine Dupont has revealed that he felt so much injustice during the World Cup quarter-final against South Africa that he had to rewatch the game the day afterward.

ADVERTISEMENT

The quarter-final result for France was by the exact same margin in 2019, a 20-19 loss to Wales, but the feeling this time was very different.

During the game there were displays of frustration from Dupont and other French players as they tried to adapt to O’Keeffe’s style.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Dupont said in an interview with legendary footballer Thierry Henry for Bros. Stories that he “needed” to rewatch the game.

“In 2019, we were eliminated by one point, the same, while we were leading by 12 or 13 points with a quarter of an hour to go, but I never watched the match again,” he told Henry.

“That one, I needed it. I couldn’t sleep, so I watched the match the next day.

“Because you always have an impression on the pitch, and sometimes, rewatching the match it’s different.

“It was to see if this feeling of injustice was real or not.”

The scrumhalf was openly critical in his post-match comments in the aftermath of the loss saying he didn’t think that the “refereeing was up to the challenge.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Following the criticism O’Keeffe brushed off the comments as part of the emotional toll.

“It’s obviously a very emotional time,” O’Keeffe told NewsHub at the time. “I just try to respect that and give them space.”

A World Rugby review into the performance highlighted five major errors with O’Keeffe’s decisions, most of which went South Africa’s way that were material to scoring events during the game.

France benefitted from two major infringements that weren’t picked up and allowed to play on.

Dupont said whilst he will likely get another chance to hoist the William Webb Ellis trophy, he will hold regret over the “nightmare”.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I will have the opportunity to win it [the World Cup] perhaps, but we regret the match,” he told Henry.

“You replay the movie in your head and the worse it goes, the worse it ends up going.

“So all you want to do is sleep and then wake up hoping that it’s just a nightmare. Unfortunately, you have to come to accept it and move on.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

39 Comments
B
Bob Marler 389 days ago

The best sports men and women - real champions - have short memories.

And they certainly don’t whine like babies for weeks on end.

Moveon.com.

T
Turlough 389 days ago

Not to inflame thinsg further but amazed that Arendse’s push on Fickou for Try 1 wasn’t picked up. The push meant Fickou clattered into the two Frenchmen under thr high ball….which rebounded into the path of Arendse who had a clear run to the try line.

R
Riekert 390 days ago

Why is my comment to shown is this site shaddow banning people that speak the truth????

T
The Crypto 390 days ago

Dear Antoine, your country through FIFA like backdoor dealings stole the hosting RSA had been promised the only Tier 1 nation with just one hosting. All others with 2 and in some instances shared for a 3rd time.

You were on every poster pre-ordained like Lomu in 1999, as if the tourny was all about you and your nation. BTW against real opponents I never saw one Fourie Du Preez no 9 performance like he did vs ENG for a 36 - 0 beating in England in RWC2007, where RSA won a title in your home land, yet you underestimated their team level of commitment.

You had 2 players that may have got yellows if EBEN'S BENCHMARK was the standard that didn’tget one. After 65 mins your team fizzled out, to a side with a Bench who always finishes strong. Rugby is a 80 min game.

You had 10mins of an extra man, and still gave up 4 tries in defence where the Boks gave up 3.

The problem was your mental entitlement to be Champion, without having as a challenger the ability to knock the real champion out, who played away in the NH like 75% of their RWC wins in a crowd hostile environment, where most neutrals also wanted you to win.

They are beasts for coming through all that, and it was only mid-journey of an all the way hostile crying angry babies tunnel with French, Eng & NZ vitriol that still runs today, just like you.

Too African Too Strong, more tries, 10 mins Bin time, great blocked kick, because of guile graft and toil to a level you have yet to expereince.

Visualizing something is one thing, the mental cognizance of failure to deliver is however all yours, it’s earned. Learn something from it.

D
Derek 391 days ago

I hope that your Christmas comes sooooooooon

D
Dan 391 days ago

Haha Ben Smith is such a loser! Everything he writes shouts loser!

E
Emmanuel 391 days ago

Seems pretty embarassing the overwhelming negative comments from English speaking fans on this topic. All sports have disputable calls like the hand of god or offensive interference in American football, and rubgy leaves so much judgement that its gets twice as much.
All this will not help elevating the sport from its “british empire” origins. I’m sorry all your Southern hemisphere sympathies do nothing for this sport in big markets like western Europe (ex UK) or even the US.

J
Jon 391 days ago

What’s French for ‘put on your big boy pants’?

B
Blake 391 days ago

Wishing you the Luck / Divine Favour of the Springboks over the Festive Season and the coming year!

P
Pecos 391 days ago

Boo bloody hoo.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 22 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search