Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Anyone who moves to France and wins Player of the Year is really something'

Zach Mercer a connu un succès retentissant en France (Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images)

All Black Bruce Reihana has been left “shocked” by Steve Borthwick’s decision to dump Zach Mercer from the 41-strong official England training squad preparing for the Rugby World Cup in France, where the No.8 has been a superstar for Montpellier for the last two seasons.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reihana, one of Montpellier’s coaches who helped guide the club to the Top 14 title two seasons ago when Mercer was named the league’s Player of the Year, is adamant the No.8 should be in England’s starting XV let alone the expanded training squad. However, Borthwick believes he can do without Mercer, who left Montpellier at the end of the season to join Gloucester to ensure he was available for England.

Now, he finds himself surplus to requirements, although with pre-World Cup matches and doubts over Billy Vunipola’s fitness after his operation, Mercer may still figure in Borthwick’s plans for the tournament. Reihana’s starting back for row for England would be Courtney Lawes (blindside), Zach Mercer (No.8) and one of the Curry brothers at openside or Jack Willis. What is not negotiable is Mercer’s place in the back row.

Reihana, who was a fan favourite when at Northampton, believes Mercer made an even bigger impact for Montpellier this season when they struggled to live up to the tag of reigning champions, delivering personal performances of real impact on the pitch and becoming a leader of the squad off it. Mercer was made vice captain and the home crowd gave him a standing ovation when he made his final appearance for the club, who finished 11th in the league.

Before joining Montpellier, Mercer spent five years playing for Bath where he scored 95 points in 76 Premiership appearances and his two England caps to date were both won in November 2018. His ball-playing style saw critics claim Mercer would not have the “dog” to make an impact in the intensely physical Top 14 but he proved them wrong.

Reihana told RugbyPass: “I am very, very surprised and shocked that Zach is not in the squad and the way he played when we won the league was phenomenal and anyone who moves to France and wins Player of the Year is really something. He was extraordinary and then to go through a season when the team struggled and really stand up, showed his true character not only on the pitch but also off it as a leader. For me that was an even bigger challenge to show he could perform when the pressure was really on.

“I would have him starting at No.8 because he offers so much more than anyone else. His differences are huge compared to all the other No.8s and I would compare his impact to what Kieran Reid did for the All Blacks. That is the kind of player you need on the pitch because he has great off-loading skills, can run over you and he can beat you with his footwork. It is one thing to run straight at people but if you have that x-factor it makes such difference and he is the complete package. He proved that because he is also a line out jumper. When you go to a World Cup you need someone with that full package.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The move from Bath was perfect and he had to restart and work on all the basics. Every week he was taking the bags out to do extra training and to get the timing of his hits in the tackle right. The boys over here are massive and he worked on his tackling and was consistent and pushed hard every week. I can’t remember a game in the last two seasons when he didn’t play.”

Reihana, who believes the World Cup is “France’s to lose” because of their strength in depth, is confident Mercer will handle the mental blow of being axed by England and will be ready to make an impact if the call comes before the Cup kicks off. “He made the tough decision to come to France and that showed his mentality,” he added. “He grew even stronger mentally this season when he was in difficult situations and was out of his comfort zone.

“After he left I sent him a message which said: ‘what you did last season was incredible but this season was better because you had to stand up on and off the pitch and test yourself.’ I thought he would make the England squad having gone back there because he should be in their best back row unit. He is so dynamic and has a great rugby brain.

“It was a difficult season for us after winning the title and we need to look in the mirror and see how we responded as players and coaches. I felt a lot of the players didn’t do that and small things cost us and the previous season we took those chances. Zach was one of the consistent guys for us and that is why we made vice captain.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
J
John 515 days ago

Very disappointed. A class act who should be starting

M
Mike 515 days ago

Damn, was really looking forward to seeing him in the #8 jersey

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
M.W.Keith 15 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

SA will drop? Not according to the quality of output in the last few years. Any South African will tell you that they feel more confident in the level of SA rugby than they have in years. The Springboks immediately improved when Rassie championed a global outlook on the game and the structures. Players are proud of their ability to pull contracts overseas. They are also proud to play at home. Are SA teams dominating the URC? Not exactly. Are they playing well? Absolutely. Is the national team having its greatest era ever? Undoubtedly. Will this last no? Hell no. Is that the fault of opening the selection policy? Of course not. Teams ebb and flow, there will always be winner and losers somewhere. The global standard of rugby has raised enormously. We all know ABs fans expect to be the best there ever was for all and eternity; and undoubtedly NZ will always be sitting at the high table due to rugby culture and exceptional athletes, but to suggest that allowing overseas players into the national team will automatically decrease domestic strength has no basis in reality.


But of course, this isn't my team and it's not my problem. There will always be people on either side of the fence, I just believe that closing off a national team just because a players seeks a salary elsewhere is indicative of a very limited mindset. All I hope for is for the ABs to continue being a force on the field, regardless of who plays in the jersey, so that the Springboks can continue being pushed everytime they meet each other on the field.

90 Go to comments
M
M.W.Keith 28 minutes ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Something being relevant just because someone wants to make it relevant is a bit of a logical fallacy there. Similarly, I also said that these traditional aspects of rugby need to change - rather than it being what makes the sport beautiful. It's a beautiful sport because of the long-standing rivalries and the way the game is played. However, if rugby wants to become a global sport then some old ways are going to have to update themselves for the sake of service to the sport. This is the entire point of my comment, which perhaps you missed? I really don't think that embracing the global game will turn rugby into football, let's be honest. Test is the pinnacle of rugby, unlike football where club reigns supreme. This is a culture that won't change.


You speak of four of the top five nations having closed border policies. Well, Ireland is really just Leinster and a handful of other players. Irish rugby is coming up well, but let's not pretend there is parity between clubs. If you want to eb in the national team, your best chance is to get into Dublin let alone stay in the country. England rugby? They have often been said to have one of the deepest pools and pockets in the game, so they have the potential to be healthy regardless. If they can sort out their identity anyway. But thene again, are they so healthy? Clubs closing down, extraordinary players in the prime leaving (Ribbans, Arundell et al.), it's not a great look over there. France? France is a whole different kettle of fish - no other nation in the world can claim to have such strong multi-league club rugby, so even there they have an enormous feeder culture. Besides, loads of players want to move to France for the money so it's a moot point even thinking of reasons why French players would want to leave their home country. The money is at home.


Your comment on whether or not it is worth it, considering the length of the season. This is a very fair question, one in which SA is going to have to learn the answer to over the coming seasons. But there are two points to consider here: 1) can this not create a situation whereby increased depth and rotation for player health and safety allows for more players to get game time? If Rassie can rotate 50+ players in a season and maintain a great record, then it can be done. Naturally, clubs won't have the same resources at hand but nevertheless there is a solution to be found rather than restricting the top level of the game to a smaller number of players. If rugby wants to expand its reach, it is going to have to expand its structures in order to do so. The second point is that this exact question strengthens the call for a global calendar. Get NH and SH national and club teams aligned.


However, I do think that you have missed my point. Basically, why should a player be excluded from selection just because they earn money elsewhere? Yes, it's a difficult scenario. Yes, there will have to be workarounds. But to say that "it is simpler and easier to manage" is a lazy excuse. This handling of the Mounga situation is a total farce, because there is no clear vision here. Certain players are given sabbaticals, or they sign short term contracts with foreign teams knowing that by and large their national jersey is nailed down. Why not just let them play overseas, if their jersey is so nailed down? There is no easy answer to the problems we all know that global rugby is running headlong into, but right now there seem to be a lot of cooks with a lot of their own priorities in the kitchen and something is going to have to give.

90 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Welsh regional rugby has failed conclusively and there is no way back' 'Welsh regional rugby has failed conclusively and there is no way back'
Search