Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ardie would have played if the Hurricanes had something to play for

Ardie Savea of the Hurricanes looks on during the round seven Super Rugby Pacific match between Highlanders and Hurricanes at Forsyth Barr Stadium, on April 08, 2023, in Dunedin, New Zealand. (Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

The battle between the third-placed Hurricanes and table-topping Chiefs was diminished by three things.

ADVERTISEMENT

The weather first and foremost, the absence of some big name All Blacks, but most importantly the lack of consequences.

Ardie Savea and Jordie Barrett were rested as per the All Black resting policy, while the Chiefs were at full-strength leading to a one-sided contest, by Kiwi derby standards.

The Chiefs built a 17-0 lead in torrential conditions that was never likely to be overcome by a Hurricanes side missing their two best players.

But the sad thing is, if those two All Blacks had played, the result really wouldn’t have mattered all that much and that is the bigger problem.

There is essentially nothing at stake in regular season clashes with eight play-off spots in a 12-team competition.

Yes, there is jostling for home-field advantage but that incentive is nothing like do-or-die contests where a team’s season is on the line.

ADVERTISEMENT

If the competition had just four play-off positions, where good teams miss out, there is no doubt that Ardie Savea and Jordie Barrett would have been on the field in Hamilton to play the Chiefs.

That loss would have had real consequences with the Hurricanes now in fifth position looking on the outside-in.

The contest with the Blues next week, who occupy the spot above them, would already have play-off intensity.

Instead, the result doesn’t really matter because both sides know there are no consequences of losing with play-offs assured.

ADVERTISEMENT

Only four play-off positions would mean the Crusaders, Brumbies, Blues and Hurricanes would still be chasing qualification with the risk of missing out still very real with two rounds to play.

In trying to sell extra play-off fixtures to broadcasters, they have failed to realise how much they have killed interest in the 15 week regular season.

The journey is just as important as the destination but Super Rugby Pacific’s Oprah-style playoff system kills any sense of tension.

The competition sleep walks to the play-offs, and because there are a bunch of miserable teams being handed tickets to compete, lacks credibility.

The teams that are supposedly ‘fighting for their seasons’ at the bottom of the ladder are so bad it is like asking a boxer who has already been KO’d to keep getting up to fight another round.

Talk of the Highlanders needing to rally to make the eight after a pathetic season with four wins and eight losses is hard to stomach.

We already know they are awful. They don’t deserve to be anywhere near the play-offs. If they get there, they are going to sent packing immediately. They don’t deserve another week on TV. Get them out of here.

In order to restore the competition’s integrity there needs to be lightening-rod change initiated to reduce the play-offs to four spots.

The regular season has to mean something. The bar has been set so low that teams are being rewarded for being abominable.

The competition needs high-stakes regular season games to become an elite sporting competition and product, and the only way to get that is to raise the bar.

Take some icing off the top and beef up the cake please, and maybe you’ll find more fans want to eat it.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
A
Andrew 580 days ago

ABSOLUTELY. How much longer can this farce continue?

m
marty 580 days ago

I’d go with top 6 to ensure a non New Zealand team makes it. Or in a few years at least one NZ team 😁

f
flyinginsectshrimp 580 days ago

Fifteen years ago, the competitiveness and excitement of Super Rugby made it the premier club competition globally.

These days, it kneels in the shadows of the Top 14, Champions and Challenge Cups, and possibly the English Premiership and URC.

I have a Stan Sport subscription, but I've watched perhaps 5 full games this season — it's such a low stakes, boring competition, with just 5 competitive teams — and only the Drua and their fans bringing some colour.

B
Big A 580 days ago

I thought you journos were not allowed to write stuff like that - well done - we need more of this - shake everything up - Rigamortis is setting in with this SRP thing - the last straw was when the Brumbs tested their side for the Crusaders game earlier in the year - the Tahs doing the same against the Blues was also a disgrace - i thought WTF - if the best are t going to regularly play against the best then what is the point of this comp anyway.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search