Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Are the Springboks now a better team than when they won the World Cup?

Jesse Kriel and Pieter-Steph du Toit of the Springboks celebrate during The Rugby Championship match between Australia Wallabies and South Africa Springboks at Optus Stadium on August 17, 2024 in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

A lot has changed in the South Africa set-up since Siya Kolisi lifted the Webb Ellis Cup in October.

ADVERTISEMENT

A large chunk of Rassie Erasmus’ backroom staff have moved on, with the new coaching team beginning to impress their thumbprint on the Springboks, chiefly new attack coach Tony Brown who has brought far more width to their game.

With this change in style has come a change in playing personnel too, with the world champions on the foothills of creating their new squad for 2027 by introducing plenty of new faces to the Test arena over the past months.

Video Spacer

Does rugby have celebrities? | RPTV

The Boks Office guys on rugby’s true celebrities. Watch the full episode on RugbyPass TV

WATCH NOW

Video Spacer

Does rugby have celebrities? | RPTV

The Boks Office guys on rugby’s true celebrities. Watch the full episode on RugbyPass TV

WATCH NOW

The Springboks are certainly different since the World Cup, but are they necessarily better than they were in 2023 when they were crowned world champions for a record fourth time?

That was the question posed by Hanyani Shimange on the latest episode of RugbyPass TV’s The Boks Office to which Springbok centurion Jean de Villiers listed the reasons why that may well be the case. Though he did not definitively say whether they are better or not, he made a compelling case.

Fixture
Rugby Championship
South Africa
31 - 27
Full-time
New Zealand
All Stats and Data

“I think we’ve evolved,” the former Springboks captain said on the podcast.

“There’s way more threat from an attacking point of view. You’ve got so much more variety, so defending I think is far more difficult. But we always have the capability of reverting back to our traditional strength, like we saw at the weekend with the maul. So it really does make us extremely dangerous.

“Plus, add to that the depth we have. You now go into a game – just take the flyhalf situation – you have Sacha [Feinberg-Mngomezulu], Manie [Libbok], Handre [Pollard], three totally different flyhalves that offer you something totally different. So you can even go into a game with a certain strategy and change it up halfway through the game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

14 Comments
F
Forward pass 130 days ago

Nope. Ireland beat them last year and this year.

F
Flankly 130 days ago

So a 0% record against Ireland last year and a 50% record this year, which in your mind proves that SA are not better this year? Not sure anyone understands what you are saying.


But we can probably agree it would be great to see Ireland get better.

M
Mr G 131 days ago

I don't think the question should be whether the Boks are better than they were last year? The playing structures are changing although the the team is still much the same. So i don't think better, I just think evolving is more accurate or more evolved . The real question should be, are we more consistent? It has been a problem of ours for years as seen with the Ireland tests and will definitely be with the 2 tests against the AB's. The Irish and the AB's are where we need to measure ourselves.

S
SF 131 days ago

Difficult to say. I don't think the current Bok team is necessarily better.

What is better is the fact that the Boks are evolving their game to become more attacking.

But the new style brought in by Brown is far from perfect at the moment.

The AB's vs Boks test will be the big test for their new style of play. Mistakes and risk comes with flamboyant and attacking play.

The AB's are masters of counter attack and scoring tries off opposition mistakes.

The 2 upcoming tests in SA will be the litmus test for the Boks new style of play.

And I think these 2 tests are going to be very close and very intense.

I never write of any AB team.

D
DC000 131 days ago

Still completely rely on the incompetence of refs to get wins they clearly don't deserve - just like the RWC.


At the RWC, it was Barnes. Now it is Pearce and Whitehouse. So no change at all it seems.


Clearly still the third best team in the world after Ireland and France.

F
Flankly 130 days ago

Love it when the Bok haters get emotional. Sign of good days ahead for the Boks.

A
Ace 131 days ago

Poor little naaijill. Still the same broken record. Getting bored* on the backseat, sonny?


*It's a pun ;)

W
WW 131 days ago

So you're saying change only happens when South Africa loses? What a twat! I pray you're not married or have any kids, you're a kak role model.

Z
ZB 131 days ago

Who's this guy!? Sounds like he's part of MAGA with that level of conspiracy theory. "Clearly still the 3rd best team in the world"...when they are literally ranked number 1 lol.

G
GH 131 days ago

Shame DC. Hope you have a shoulder to cry on. Have you considered therapy maybe? Or you could share your delusion with Ben Smith on this very website.

J
Jen 131 days ago

Better? Not sure. All I know is that they are still very, very good.

G
GrahamVF 131 days ago

Yes.

T
Terry24 131 days ago

Its a tricky question. Its like the whose is the best historical team question. Rugby IQ evolves. It is generally agreed that the 2015 Kiwis were best ever. But would the 2015 team beat the 2023 SA team given that rugby IQ is generally smarter?


Likewise I would say that the SA-Ireland matches were arguably at least a match for the world cup match with both teams arguably more advanced. So SA are better now than last year. Last year they were looking at only counter attacking tries to stay with the big threat France in their Knock out run. I think the current team would fare better in that match.


We will see how good against NZ. I have a feeling the Wallabies matches were controlled, almost the way the Boks dispatched Scotland in the RWC pool. But the NZ match will be all-out like the France QF.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 19 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Gaston Mieres: 'Rugby has been an addiction - a good one' Gaston Mieres: 'Rugby has been an addiction - a good one'
Search