Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Are you having a laugh?': Penny cops ban for Newcastle red card

(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Newcastle full-back Tom Penny has been banned for two matches after appearing at a disciplinary hearing following his 49th-minute red card from referee Anthony Woodthorpe in last Saturday’s Gallagher Premiership win over Wasps at Kingston Park. Penny was sent packing for contact with the eye area of Jimmy Gopperth, contrary to World Rugby law 9.12.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Falcons boss Dean Richards defended his player post-game, claiming: “Tom is distraught in the changing room because he didn’t think anything was deliberate. His leg was trapped in by Jimmy Gopperth, and you have got to look at who the instigator of the whole thing was. 

“Tom tried to release his leg three times and couldn’t. As he was stumbling away and breaking free, he pushes his face and catches I think his eye. Jimmy makes a meal of it and if there is contact with the eye then so be it. It wasn’t deliberate and you have to look at who the protagonist is. It’s clearly Jimmy Gopperth, and why should our boy get penalised for being held in at a ruck?”

Video Spacer

Jonny Hill guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Jonny Hill guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

At the resulting disciplinary hearing, Newcastle back Penny accepted the charge and was given a two-match suspension by a panel comprising James Dingemans with Mitch Read and Leon Lloyd. He is free to play again on October 19. In addition, Penny was given a reprimand in relation to a separate charge brought under RFU rule 5.12 for disrespecting the authority of the match official by questioning, “Are you having a laugh?”

The full judgment from the hearing stated: “The player did not intend to make contact with the eye, but the action was reckless because he made contact with the face of the Wasps player close to the eye. The comments made to the match official were intentionally made because the player made the remark.”

Penny explained in his defence: “As I tried to release myself, Wasps No12 then gripped me harder pulling my left leg closer to the ruck, refusing to allow me to leave. His grip on my leg, neck and shoulder area was becoming dangerous as I tried more and more to release myself, my left leg was unsteady and ineffective as he had held on to it and all my weight because other people had joined the ruck was starting to move onto that left leg.

“Without looking at him I pushed him with an open hand around the shoulder area to force him to release me. Panicking, I pushed him once more on the shoulder and once again on the top side of his head area, both with an open palm and was just about to move away when his left leg swung through and hit my supporting outside knee causing it to jolt sideways about three feet. It wasn’t an insignificant blow from his knee, it caught my knee in which I have had an ACL repair and the initial pain caused me to react by leaning back to push him on his head once more.

ADVERTISEMENT

“As I pushed his head while still unsteady having been knocked sideways, I now believe my little finger caught him in the eye. I wasn’t aware that I had caught him in the eye at the time and it certainly wasn’t my intention and totally felt that I was never going to be anywhere near it, but had I not been off-balance I know I certainly wouldn’t have been as I am not that type of person.

“I was looking at him at the time so I was surprised when I was told by the referee that I had made contact with the eye. I spoke to the player post-match and apologised to him. He seemed fine about it, saying it was just rugby. I am not happy about making contact with the eye and am angry that the whole incident happened in the first place.”

A four-week entry point was determined for sanction which was subsequently halved, meaning Penny will miss the Newcastle matches versus Saracens and Bristol. “We have provided the maximum mitigation in this case because the player admitted the breaches; the player has a good disciplinary record; and the player has cooperated with the disciplinary process,” read the panel’s summary.

“Although the player’s comment to the referee in relation to the first offence and the red card was disrespectful, the player is being separately sanctioned for that and it would not be appropriate to penalise the player twice for the same conduct.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 5 | Making Waves

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
N
Neale 1296 days ago

Disciplinary panels in England are a joke. Jordie Barrett kung-foo's an Aussie in the face and gets off, Ted Hill and Penney get reds for accidental offences and get banned for three and two weeks. Go figure.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 52 minutes ago
Reds vs Blues: Ex-All Black missed the mark, Lynagh’s Wallabies statement

Agree re Lynagh.


Disagree Beaver got it wrong. Blues made that look easy. It might be a brawn over brains picture though? More in the last point, but, and this may have changed by player selection, the Reds were very lucky this game. Tele’a should not have been red carded as Ryan landed on his shoulder, and both Tate and Jock (was it) should have been yellowed carded for their offenses in stopping tries. We also had a try dissallowed by going back 10 phases in play. We all should have learned after the RWC that that is against the rules. So straight away on this simple decisions alone the result changes to go in the Blues favour, away from home and playing fairly poorly. The sleeping giant if you will. I didn’t agree with the Blues take either tbh, but to flip it around and say it’s the Reds instead is completely inaccurate (though a good side no doubt you have to give them a chance).


And you’re also riding the wave of defense wins matches a bit much. Aside from Dre’s tackling on Rieko I didn’t see anything in that match other than a bit of tiny goal line defending. I think if you role on the tap for another second you see the ball put placed for the try (not that I jump to agree with Eklund purely because he was adamant), and in general those just get scored more often than not. They are doing something good though stopping line breaks even if it is the Blues (and who also got over the line half a dozen times), I did not expect to be greeted with that stat looking at the game.

8 Go to comments
A
Ashley Carson 1 hour ago
'Not real Lions': How the 1989 British and Irish tourists put Australia on the map

Life can unravel in an instant. For me, that moment came when deceitful cryptocurrency brokers vanished with £40,000 of my savings, a devastating blow that left me paralyzed by shame and despair. The aftermath was a fog of sleepless nights, self-doubt, and a crushing sense of betrayal. I questioned every choice, wondering how I’d fallen for such a scheme. Hope felt like a luxury I no longer deserved. Then, Tech Cyber Force Recovery emerged like a compass in a storm. Skeptical yet desperate, I reached out, half-expecting another dead end. What I found, however, was a team that radiated both expertise and empathy. From our first conversation, they treated my crisis not as a case file, but as a human tragedy. Their professionalism was matched only by their compassion, a rare combination in the often impersonal world of finance.

What happened next defied logic. Within 72 hours of sharing my story, they traced the labyrinth of blockchain transactions, outmaneuvering the scammers with surgical precision. When their email arrived, “Funds recovered, secure and intact,” I wept. It wasn’t just the money; it was the validation that justice could prevail. Tech Cyber Force Recovery didn’t just restore my finances, they resurrected my dignity. But their impact ran deeper. They demystified the recovery process, educating me without judgment. Their transparency became a lifeline, transforming my fear into understanding. Where I saw chaos, they saw patterns; where I felt powerless, they instilled agency. Today, I’m rebuilding not just my savings, but my trust in humanity. Tech Cyber Force Recovery taught me that vulnerability isn’t weakness, and that seeking help is an act of courage. To those still trapped in the aftermath of fraud: miracles exist. They wear no capes, but they wield algorithms and integrity like superheroes. To the extraordinary Tech Cyber Force Recovery team, your work is more than technical prowess. It’s alchemy, turning despair into resilience. You gave me more than my funds; you gave me my future. May your light guide countless others through their darkest nights. From the depths of my heart: Thank you.

Consult Tech Cyber Force Recovery for help.

MAIL.. Techcybersforcerecovery@cyberservices.com

3 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING URC statement: Munster-Bulls error and 'entirely untrue' Piardi rumours URC statement: Munster-Bulls controversy and 'entirely untrue' Piardi
Search