Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Arendse cops ban for incident that saw Barrett land on his head

(Photo by Dirk Kotze/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Springboks wing Kurt-Lee Arendse has been hit with a four-week ban for his horror air collision with Beauden Barrett during the Rugby Championship opener with New Zealand at the weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Arendse pleaded guilty to the SANZAAR charge relating to the misjudged tackle that saw All Blacks flyhalf Barrett land on his head at Mbombela Stadium in Nelspruit.

Arendse contravened Law 9.17: A player must not tackle, charge, pull, push or grasp an opponent whose feet are off the ground. He red carded in 74th minute for the incident and has now been suspended from all forms of the game up to and including 17 September 2022.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

All Blacks head coach Ian Foster and scrumhalf Aaron Smith were irate following the game.

“Our ability to diffuse their bombs is something that we need to fix, but their tactics there are a little bit borderline,” Smith said. “To see Beauden Barrett do a full flip is pretty scary. That is a part of the game that needs to be looked at a little bit. We have to do better to protect our jumpers.”

Foster was also spitting after the incident.

“We’re going to have a look at them chucking bodies in the air, we were pretty frustrated with that,” said the 57-year-old. “The one in the first half we weren’t very happy with, and certainly the last one, was very dangerous.

“But that’s part of the game we’ve got to sort out. If they’re going to just chuck bodies up, and just throw people up in the air, it’s a very hard thing to deal with. That’s the game. We missed one and they scored, and that got them the early momentum.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In his finding, Foul Play Review Committee Chairman Michael Heron QC ruled the following:

“Having conducted a detailed review of all the available evidence, including all camera angles and additional evidence, including from the player and submissions from his legal representative, Attie Heyns, the Foul Play Review Committee upheld the red card under Law 9.17.”

“With respect to sanction the Foul Play Review Committee considered the act of foul play was reckless, highly dangerous and had a considerable impact on the victim player. The Committee accepted it was not deliberate and after considering all relevant factors decided the foul play merited a mid-range entry point of 8 weeks. However, taking into account mitigating factors including the Player’s clean judicial record and his acceptance of guilt at the first available opportunity, the Foul Play Review Committee reduced the suspension to 4 weeks.”

“The player is therefore suspended for 4 weeks, up to and including 17 September 2022.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
M
Mark 836 days ago

The Foul Play Review Committee need to ignore any mitigation based on a previous clean record and accepting guilt. It just makes the Barrett fall seem he was unlucky to land on his neck as "the act of foul play was reckless, highly dangerous and had a considerable impact on the victim player"
This should be 8 weeks (I'm not picking on the player) to act as a deterrent for future similar incidents.
And, if this tackle had been earlier in the game SA would have only lost him for 20 minutes - more bullshit for a very dangerous tackle

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NB 47 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Nice bit if revisioniusm but that's all it is JW.


For your further education, I found the following breakdown of one prominent club's finances in the Top 14 [Clermont].


For Clermont (budget of €29.5 million for 2021-2022) :

- 20% from ticket sales

- 17% from the LNR (includes TV Rights, compensation from producing french internationals and other minor stuff)

- 5% from public collectivities (so you're looking at funds from the city of Clermont, the department of Puy-De-Dôme and the region Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes)

- 4% from merchandising and events

- 3% from miscellaneous

- 51 % from sponsorships and partnerships. They've got 550 different partners. The main ones are CGI, Groupama, Limagrain/Jacquet, Omerin, Paprec, Renault and of course Michelin (not surprising since they're actually the founders of the club).


As you can see nothing comes from the FFR at all. The LNR is a separate entitiy to FFR and their aims frequently do not accord.


It is also why the European breakaway plotted by LNR and PR back in 2013 had nothing to do with the governing bodies of either England or France - and it most certainly did not have their blessing https://www.espn.co.uk/rugby/story/_/id/15331030/jean-pierre-lux-anglo-french-cup-detrimental-european-rugby


And from the horse's mouth [ex AB skipper Sean Fitapatrick] about the comp between Top 14 and Super Rugby:


"The Top 14 in France is probably the best rugby competition in the world at the moment, purely for the week-in, week-out.”


“I think the quality of players. They are bigger, they are faster, they are stronger. Which then carries on into the international game.”

Take it from someone who knows JW😅

293 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING World Cup-winning halfback on Cam Roigard’s substitution in France loss World Cup-winning halfback on Cam Roigard’s substitution vs. France
Search