Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Three tactics from Argentina that proved the difference against the All Blacks

(Photos by James Foy/Speed Media/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

Argentina registered their third ever win over the All Blacks in Wellington but this one was different in many ways to their last two victories.

ADVERTISEMENT

Under new head coach Felipe Contepomi Argentina stuck to a new plan and it paid off in the end.

They scored the most points ever in a Test match against New Zealand, bettering their benchmark of 25 points set in the first two wins.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Here are three key tactics that worked for Argentina in toppling the All Blacks in the opening round of the Rugby Championship.

The deep kick off and smother

Argentina nullified the All Blacks top weapon Mark Tele’a by kicking deep on restarts and smothering him directly after the catch.

They were able to pin the All Blacks’ winger 15 metres or so from the goal line multiple times, before pressuring the exit kick. TJ Perenara had two exit kicks charged down in the first half.

Los Pumas’ timing on the kick restarts was excellent, arriving right as Tele’a caught the ball and in numbers to pin the All Blacks in a deep position.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the first half, Tele’a offloaded one of them and a couple passes later the All Blacks conceded a penalty next to the sticks.

The deep kick and smother tactic worked perfectly for Argentina and they showed something the All Blacks didn’t have a solution for.

Aggressive intent from penalties

The two previous Argentinian wins were almost a carbon copy of each other: one opportunist try and buckets of penalty goals on the way to 25 points both times.

This time was more aggressive, they rolled the dice a lot more. The Pumas turned down shots at goal regularly to put the ball in the corner, and didn’t always come up with points.

ADVERTISEMENT

Santiago Carreras went to the lineout with the team down 10-0, and they were snuffed on first phase by Dalton Papali’i five metres out. But this intent to attack paid off.

After the All Blacks exited from there, they stripped Tyrel Lomax around halfway and immediately shifted wide, centre Chocobares breaking through and setting up Lucio Cinti for a counter-attacking try. It was the type of transition try the All Blacks usually score on their opposition.

Later in the first half they had one roll of the dice from the corner, failed, but earnt another penalty and took the three.

Early in the first half after Pablo Matera’s penalty, they went to the corner and mauled over with lock Franco Molina scoring the try.

It was only as the game entered the final 25 minutes that Argentina opted for three as the first option.

In the end they scored four tries and the aggressive intent to go for tries over the first 55 minutes paid off.

The loaded bench

The Argentinians went with a forward-heavy 6-2 bench and it worked. Of their two back reserves, they only used one. The battle of the benches proved pivotal in the final quarter.

The All Blacks set-piece faltered with their reserves on, particularly at the lineout with Asafo Aumua’s throwing an issue, while at scrum time Argentina got the upper hand.

They won a free kick on the first scrum after fresh front rows were introduced, and a penalty on the next, both times on the edge of the Argentinian 22, relieving pressure.

Although the game-changing play came from the duo of Ardie Savea, Damian McKenzie, when back-to-back errant passes lost 50 metres of territory and handed a five metre scrum to Argentina, the execution from the reserve forwards was less than desired in that final 10.

Hooker Augustin Creevy, coming off the Argentinian bench came up with multiple big plays with the go-ahead try and a key breakdown turnover on halfway with five minutes remaining. He then caught an errant throw from Aumua that went over the top uncontested that led to the final penalty.

Many of the All Blacks starters had left the field with the lead in tact at 30-28. The bench performances proved the difference.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
C
CT 129 days ago

That must really burn hey Ben 😂

B
B.J. Spratt 132 days ago

All Blacks - No leadership. No ability to adapt or read the opposition's game plan and counter it.


Poor First Five. Poor decision making. How can 5 assistant coaches work?


When will they realise Savea isn't a captain?


Razor needs to Coach and be Razor. Not coach by committee, none of whom will ever be All Black Coach. It's like when you have a syndicate who owns a horse. Everyone thinks they own the horse individually.


Payout Mounga's Japanese contract. We need him now.

M
MO 131 days ago

YES, YES, YES - 5 coaches who have no international experience, Savea is a great player but no captain - poor on field leadership again from Ardie

J
Jen 131 days ago

TOO MANY FECKING COACHES

P
PC 132 days ago

I knew they would lose at half time when Ryan spoke to the media about how we this and we that, as if tye win was a foregone conclusion. No sort your s%=t out half time rev up. Just a little pep talk. These abs getting soft. Arrogance never beats passion.

W
Wayneo 132 days ago

AB's lost the game in the last 45 minutes conceding 30 points to the Pumas.


All the commotion from down under and new law trials to speed the game up has backfire if you ask me & played a big in the Pumas win.


They play a short quick game so anything to make it faster, & with less set piece plays to fatigue the forwards, will always be more to their benefit than any other test team, including the Super Rugby AB's & Wallabies.


If you watch the game again have a closer look at the Pumas ruck game. Forwards were not fatigue from scrumming so were hitting the rucks with a lot of Latin passion.


TBH, I love these new law trials, a serious case of unintended consequences coming back to bite you in the ass, so can only hope they are rolled out globally next season.

T
Tim 132 days ago

No scrums until 60mins is pretty rare. Can't really plan for that. No team intends to throw forward passes or knock on, but i guess that highlights how well both teams handled the ball. Things tend to even out over time. Difficult to guage the unintended consequences of law changes after one round.

J
JW 132 days ago

How can producing two great displays this weekend be considered backfiring?

C
CR 132 days ago

Counter attack rugby with a heavy forward pack and a forward heavy bench. Very much the 2019-2023 Springbok blueprint. Good to see it still works! We’ve evolved our game a bit since last year, but Argentina is using the blueprint to good effect. Well done to them. Their scrum has improved a lot with the younger players.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search