Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

ARU CEO Pulver to step down following Super Rugby saga

Australian Rugby Union CEO Bill Pulver

Australian Rugby Union (ARU) CEO Bill Pulver has confirmed he will stand down from his role as soon as a replacement has been found, after the organisation announced its intention to cut Western Force from Super Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

The ARU confirmed on Friday it plans to discontinue Force as a Super Rugby franchise from 2018 as the competition is trimmed from 18 to 15 teams, a decision that has prompted RugbyWA to consider legal action.

Pulver’s five-year term had been set to end in February, but he now intends to leave at the earliest opportunity.

In a news conference, he said: “I’ve told the board that I will step aside as CEO once they have found a replacement.

“We’re dealing with the issue of dropping a Super Rugby team and that has been a harrowing process. My sense is that it’s a good time for renewal – I’m coming up towards the end of my five-year term – and I think we want a clean slate.

“The next generation of rugby in this country will be served with a new head, so I think it’s the right time.

“It’s been a difficult and I think that just means it’s the right time for change … a fresh set of eyes and ears coming into this game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Pulver confirmed all contracted players at the Force will have their deals honoured, adding: “Hopefully most of them will actually find a new Super Rugby team. If they don’t, we’ll allow them to have an early release. If they don’t want an early release, we’ll still honour their contracts.”

Despite expressing deep regret to those affected by the move to cut the Force, Pulver insisted “the right decision for Australian rugby” had been made, a view echoed by ARU chairman Cameron Clyne.

“It’s not a very pleasant situation, but we have to confront reality here,” explained Clyne.

“Our teams have declined in performance. Our performance has declined from when we went from three teams to four teams, and declined when we went to five teams. I know it’s easy to say people haven’t turned up to games because of uncertainty. People haven’t turned up to games because the teams don’t win. And there’s a direct correlation to revenue.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have consulted widely, before the process, during the process. You will recall that an EGM was held and the members voted in support – they had an opportunity and they voted in support of four teams, so we’re acting in line with what the members and stakeholders want.

“It’s not going to be an easy process, but what will get revenue flowing back into the game is our teams winning. There is more chance of our teams winning with four teams, that’s the reality.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 21 minutes ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

I thought we made a lot of progress against that type of defence by the WC last year. Lots of direct running and punching holes rather than using width. Against that type of defence I think you have to be looking to kick on first phase when you have front foot ball which we did relatively successfully. We are playing a lot of rugby behind the gain line at the moment. They are looking for those little interchanges for soft shoulders and fast ball or off loads but it regularly turns into them battering away with slow ball and going backwards, then putting in a very rushed kick under huge pressure.


JB brought that dimension when he first moved into 12 a couple of years ago but he's definitely not been at his best this year. I don't know if it is because he is being asked to play a narrow role, or carrying a niggle or two, but he does not look confident to me. He had that clean break on the weekend and stood there like he was a prop who found himself in open space and didn't know what to do with the ball. He is still a good first phase ball carrier though, they use him a lot off the line out to set up fast clean ball, but I don't think anyone is particularly clear on what they are supposed to do at that point. He was used really successfully as a second playmaker last year but I don't think he's been at that role once this year. He is a triple threat player but playing a very 1 dimensional role at the moment. He and Reiko have been absolutely rock solid on defence which is why I don't think there will be too much experimentation or changes there.

41 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Marcus Smith on that substitution and his England plea Marcus Smith on that substitution and his England plea
Search