Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

As rugby union shuts doors, NRL season to go ahead despite pandemic

(Photo by James Worsfold/Getty Images)

The NRL aims to forge on with the 2020 premiership, also planning a host of contingencies, even after major rival AFL called a halt in the face of increasing coronavirus pandemic restrictions.

ADVERTISEMENT

As the AFL suspended its men’s competition and abandoned the women’s finals series on Sunday, the NRL was confident new federal government advice against “non-essential” travel wouldn’t affect them due to their use of chartered planes.

WATCH: The Tri-Nations in the ’90s and ’00s was the peak for the three powers of World Rugby as even the great All Blacks struggled to win the Bledisloe Cup.

Video Spacer

The NRL believes it is significantly different to the AFL in that the majority of its teams are based in NSW and Queensland, rather than all over the country, and it will be able to keep playing at least until the government or health officials tell them to stop.

They are concerned by the “catastrophic” financial impact any stop in play will have and acknowledge they may have to rearrange their season at any moment.

The NSW and Victorian governments announced on Sunday that they will pursue a partial shutdown of non-essent ial services over the next 48 hours.

There was also a national cabinet meeting scheduled for Sunday night, where further limitations could be implemented.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regardless, ARLC chairman Peter V’landys was confident the NRL would find a way to complete the 25-round season and finals with the league willing to play until as late as December 20.

“We are prepared for the worst, and we have looked at every contingency. We’re ready for whatever they throw at us,” V’landys told Triple M on Sunday.

“We’ve got a four-week window that we can work with during State Of Origin.

“There is a bye round and a (split) round, and we can always extend the season.

“It just really depends when we have to pull the lever to suspend the season.

“The longer we can go the better it is.”

The NRL would be staring at a loss of up to $500 million if this year’s campaign is cancelled, with clubs facing dire financial peril.

ADVERTISEMENT

In turn, the NRL has h ad assurances from biosecurity and pandemic consultants that it could keep some teams playing if a player tests positive to the virus, and have other sides make up matches later.

The option could of a string of Magic Round-style weekends is still on the table, where players are locked into one region together to avoid travel.

“There is a whiteboard at NRL head office full of contingencies and how we deal with these contingencies,” V’landys said.

“Even a complete lockdown we have a strategy for that.

“We have been proactive the whole way through and will continue to do so.”

V’landys also said conversations had begun around whether players would have to take pay cuts, as per the collective bargaining agreement if significant revenue is lost.

Meanwhile, both the NRL and players’ union plan to meet again on Monday to work towards finalising self-isolation requirements for players in a bid to protect the sport from the virus if the compe tition continues.

Players have been urged to exercise common sense while they are away from training and games.

V’landys stated on Sunday players would attract heavy penalties if they broke the measures, however, AAP understands that could be met with resistance from the union.

– AAP

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sharks captain Mbonambi addresses controversial incident with referee Sharks captain Mbonambi addresses controversial incident with referee
Search