Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

As Six Nations red cards fly one side has kept a clean sheet for 23 years

France's tight head prop Mohamed Haouas (R/#3) reacts after being issued with a red card by Georgian referee Nika Amashukeli (R) during the Six Nations rugby union tournament match between France and Scotland at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, northern Paris, on February 26, 2023. (Photo by ANNE-CHRISTINE POUJOULAT / AFP) (Photo by ANNE-CHRISTINE POUJOULAT/AFP via Getty Images)

It’s hardly a secret that there has seen a significant increase in red cards in recent years in rugby union – and the Guinness Six Nations has been no exception.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not so long ago a rarity in the sport, sendings off have become the inevitable cost of a clamp down on head contacts in rugby union. As players continue to adjust to stricter Laws and a changing emphasis on safety, it’s been a slow and at times painful process.

We take a look at the red cards in the Six Nations over the course of the last decade, thanks to data from Opta.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

According to stats from the decade spanning 2014 to 2023, there have been a total of 15 red cards in the tournament. That’s a rate of one red card every 10 games.

However, 12 of those came in the last four tournaments alone, which is a rate of one red card in every five games.

In 2014, there were three red cards, with one each for Italy, Scotland, and France. But that was an anomaly year, with the 2015 to 2019 tournaments not seeing a single red card across 75 games.

Yet in 2020, things started to change, with two reds card handed out; one a piece to England and France.

ADVERTISEMENT

2021 was an annus horribilis for players being sent off – with five red cards across the tournament, a rate of one every three games.

Data suggests that the increase in red cards is not limited to a specific team. France and Scotland have the highest number of red cards, with four each, over the last decade.

Related

England, Ireland and Italy have also had players sent off. This trend indicates that the issue is widespread, and all teams must take measures to improve player discipline and safety.

Interestingly, Wales haven’t received a single red in the last decade, whereas every single other nation has gotten at least one. In fact, Wales haven’t received a single red since Italy joined the competition in 2000.

ADVERTISEMENT

The data also shows that generally speaking, players aren’t more prone to receiving red cards than others at least in the narrow sweep of the Six Nations.

France tighthead Mohamed Haouas might be the exception. He has received two red cards, while Manu Tuilagi, Charlie Ewels, Freddie Steward, Peter O’Mahony, Bundee Aki, Rabah Slimani, Paul Willemse, Grant Gilchrist, Stuart Hogg, Finn Russell, Zander Fagerson, Michele Rizzo, and Hame Faiva have all received one.

Related

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search