Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Athleticism has finally trumped weight for France

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Just over a year ago France fielded the heaviest pack ever seen in international rugby history.

ADVERTISEMENT

The then Jacques Brunel coached team that faced Wales at the Stade de France tipped the scales at a staggering 962kg – an average of 120.3kg a man. A solid 7kg a man heavier than an average Test pack.

It was the culmination of a decade of increasingly heavy athlete selection for the French national team, a strategy that aped the Top 14’s obsessional, size at all costs approach to the game.  It’s been the fallback position for a league that former Clermont coach Joe Schmidt once described as a ‘man-up-a-thon’.

Selectors had better buy in bulk or go home.

Not that its efficacy was ever proven. While Racing 92 and La Rochelle – albeit to a lesser extent – have had success with giant forward packs, if anything the opposite was true for the many sides whose big bodies were falling by the wayside.

Toulouse fielded a one-tonne plus in 2016/17. Was it a coincidence that the aristocrats of French rugby finished an unheard of 12th that year? The same year a super-sized Bayonne were relegated. Perpignan in 2013/14 had the heaviest pack in all of France that season and were relegated and wouldn’t be seen in the French top-flight again until 2018.

Continue reading below…

WATCH: John Kirwan and Kane Hames on The Breakdown debate the ref’s decision of Paul Willemse slap down against Wales in Six Nations.

Video Spacer

In stark contrast, the teams that have dominated the same league over the last decade: Toulon, Clermont, Castres and the Toulouse side of 2011-13, did so – contrary to popular belief – with decidedly middle-weight forwards.

ADVERTISEMENT

Could it be that the Fabien Galthie’s 2020 French side has finally learned that size doesn’t win in the Top 14 and neither does it win Test matches?

It’s obvious that height and athleticism are more important for Galthie. There’s one only survivor from Brunel’s giant pack of 2019 Six Nations; a much-slimmed down 6’7, 129kg Paul Willemse. Having shed 6kg since over the summer, the big Montpellier lock is playing the rugby of his life.

France heaviest
The days of 153kg props like Atonio Uini playing for France might be over. 

That’s not to say his current crop are willowy. Far from it. The average weight of starting eight that beat Wales in Cardiff was 918kg, or 114.75kg a man. They are also tall – with an average height of 6’3.5 inches (or 191.25cm).

ADVERTISEMENT

There is a greater trend in test rugby to selecting for height at blindsides or shifting second rows into the backrow. England’s converted lock, 6’7 Courtney Lawes; the Springboks 6’6 Pieter Steph Du Toit and New Zealand’s 6’5 Liam Squire and 6’5 Jerome Kaino before that are examples of that.

Allied to that, the pretty mediocre results of Michael Cheika’s ‘Pooper’ experiment for the Wallabies suggests starting two (relatively) short opensides capable of competing for the ball on the deck wasn’t the panacea for fast-ball and turnovers on opposition ball that many thought it might be.

Height at six is an easy way to add a few inches for a third lineout option, while simultaneously providing heft for close-quarter ball-carries.

What strikes you about this French forward pack however is their abundant athleticism. They seem equally happy in the open field and with space in from to them as do they do when called upon to run over the top of the opposition.

That athleticism is reflected in the stats too. Six foot seven flanker Ollivon leads the try-scoring charts with three tries. He is also joint first with Ntamack for try assists with three. His height has also helped him to become the tournament’s leading lineout taker with 20 – 5 more than Ireland’s James Ryan in 2nd.

No.8 Gregory Alldritt leads the forwards in the competition for metres made with 271. It’s the fourth-highest of any player and seven metres more than Scottish fullback Stuart Hogg in 5th.

Galthie’s investment in youth made the headlines in the lead up to the Six Nations. But what his selections seem to indicate is that it is no longer enough to be a big body. He wants athletes into the bargain.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 31 minutes ago
France outwrestle All Blacks in titanic Test for one-point win

Yeah nar I pretty much agree with that sentiment, wasn't just about the lineout though.


Yeah, I think it's the future of SR, even TRC. Graham above just now posting about how good a night it was with a dbl header of ENGvSA and NZvFrance, and now I don't want to kick SA or Argentina out of TRC but it would be great if in this next of the woods 2 more top teams could come in to create more of these sort of nights (for rugby's appeal). Often Arg and SA and both travel here and you get those games but more often doesn't work out right.


Obviously a long way off but USA and Japan are the obvious two. First thing we need to do is get Eddie Jones kicked out of Japan so they can start improving again and then get a couple of US teams in SRP (even if one its just a US based and augmented Jaguares).


It will start off the whole conferences are crap debate again (which I will continue to argue vehemently against), but imagine a 6 team Pacific conference, Tokyo Sunwolves (drafted from Tokyo JRLO teams), Tokyo All Stars (made up of best remaining foreign players and overseas drafts), ALL Nihon (best of local non Tokyo based talent, inc China/Korea etc, with mainland Japan), a could of West Coast american franchises and perhaps a second self PI driven Hawai'i based team, or Jagaures. So I see a short NFL like 3 or 4 month comp as fitting best, maybe not even a full round, NZvAUSvPAC, all games taking place within a 6hr window. Model for NZ will definitely still require a competitive and funded NPC!


On the Crusaders, I liked last years ending with Grace on the bench (ovbiously form dependent but thats how it ended) and Lio-Willie at 8. I could have Blackadder trying to be a 7 but think balance will be used with him at 6 and Kellow as 7. Scott Barrett is an international 6 sized player. It is just NZ style/model that pushes him into the tight, I reckon he'd be a great loose player, and saders have Strange and Cahill as bigger players (plus that change could draw someone like Darry back). Same with Haig now, hes not grown yet but Barrett hight and been playing 6, now that the Highlanders have only chosen two locks he'll be playing lock, and that is going to change his growth trajectory massively, rather than seeing him grow like an International 6.

59 Go to comments
T
Tom 47 minutes ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

Interesting post. I realise that try was down to Marcus Smith not Slade, this is why I mentioned that England's attack is completely reliant on Smith working miracles. Just wanted to highlight that Slade's little touch was classy and most English players would have cocked it up. Earl has gas, he's very athletic but Underhill is nailed on at 7 in my eyes though. They both need to be on the pitch so we need a tall 6 or 8 to complement them which we have in CCS and potentially Ollie Chessum. We also have young Henry Pollock who may be the 7 by the world cup.


The whole attack needs an overhaul but Richard Wigglesworth our attack coach was a very limited scrum half who excelled at box kicking and had no running game. Spent most of his career with Saracens who mauled, defended and set pieced their way to victory.... Which might have been ok if Felix Jones hadn't quit and been replaced by a guy who coaches Oyonnax who have one of the worst defences in the French 2nd division. I'm not too emotionally invested in England right now because this coaching setup isn't capable of winning anything.


England had no attack when they were winning under Eddie either. They battered teams with huge dominant tackles and won from pressure. The last time England had any creativity in attack was the Stuart Lancaster/Mike Catt era. They played some fantastic attacking rugby but results were mediocre, lots of 2nd place finishes in the 6N although it felt like we were building something special until we got brutally dumped out of our home world cup in the pool stage.

8 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

8 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Who gives a crap?' Animosity towards the Springboks is proof of their dominance 'Who gives a crap?' Animosity towards the Springboks is proof of their dominance
Search