Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Au pays de Galles, les Bleues en marche avant toute

A l'image d'Annaëlle Deshayes, qui marque ici le premier essai des Bleues, les avants françaises ont livré un match conquérant (Photo by GEOFF CADDICK/AFP via Getty Images).

La finale France – Angleterre tant attendue aura bien lieu. Larges vainqueurs du pays de Galles ce dimanche (0-40), les Bleues ont imité les Anglaises qui avaient pulvérisé l’Irlande la veille (88-10). Avec quatre victoires chacune, les deux équipes se disputeront donc la victoire finale dans le Tournoi 2024, agrémenté du Grand Chelem, samedi prochain à Bordeaux.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mais pour s’offrir cette affiche, l’équipe de France a dû se débarrasser du pays de Galles. On ne doutait pas de la capacité des Françaises à écarter des Galloises en souffrance (seule équipe sans victoire à ce jour), mais on attendait surtout la confirmation de la victoire enfin convaincante, décrochée la semaine dernière contre l’Italie, après deux victoires inaugurales (Irlande, Écosse) qui avaient laissé tout le monde sur sa faim.

Synthèse du match

0
Coups de pied de pénalité
0
0
Essais
6
0
Transformations
5
0
Drops
0
144
Courses avec ballon
73
4
Franchissements
9
21
Turnovers perdus
18
6
Turnovers gagnés
6

A vrai dire, il y a eu de tout dans ce match. Du très bon, avec la mêlée, l’activité des avants, l’efficacité offensive et défensive, ou l’intégration des septistes (Ciofani, Grisez). Du moins bon aussi, avec ces difficultés en touche ou sur les mauls, et une certaine indiscipline (trois cartons jaunes).

Entrées dans les 22 m

Moyenne des points marqués
0
7
Entrées
Moyenne des points marqués
4
10
Entrées

Pénalités

12
Pénalités concédées
7
0
Cartons jaunes
3
0
Cartons rouges
0

Les Galloises pourront même s’en vouloir de terminer ce match à zéro point. Elles ont pourtant eu des occasions, ont occupé le camp français plus que de coutume, ont caressé la ligne d’essai à plusieurs reprises.

Notamment dès l’entame de match. On ne jouait que depuis deux minutes quand Anne-Cécile Ciofani écopait d’un carton jaune pour un contact épaule-tête, à l’occasion de sa première sélection à XV.

Mais avec une Pauline Bourdon-Sansus à la baguette, qui jouait deux fois rapidement (une pénalité puis une touche), Lina Queyroi servait Annaëlle Deshayes lancée. La pilière, d’ailleurs élue meilleure joueuse du match, couvrait les 20 m restants pour marquer alors que son équipe jouait à 14 contre 15 (0-7, 11e).

ADVERTISEMENT

Rebelote cinq minutes plus tard. Les locales pilonnaient la ligne française depuis deux minutes quand Joanna Grisez interceptait la dernière passe galloise et faisait parler ses jambes de septiste sur 100 m (0-14, 16e). Elle récidivera en tout fin de match, pour une 2e interception synonyme de doublé (0-40, 79e).

A la 20e minute, on était pourtant à 70% de possession pour les filles de Cardiff ! Mais dominer et marquer sont deux choses bien différentes, les Françaises pourraient en parler, en référence à leurs premiers matchs dans le Tournoi.

Possession

Team Logo
6%
27%
46%
21%
Team Logo
10%
50%
21%
18%
Team Logo
Team Logo
64%
Possession sur les 10 dernières minutes
36%
62%
Possession
38%

Occupation

17%
20%
20%
43%
Team Logo
Team Logo
63%
Occupation
37%

Et sur une mêlée, le gros point de satisfaction de l’après-midi, les Bleues récupéraient le cuir. La N.8 Teani Feleu se faisait la malle petit côté et transmettait à sa coéquipière de la 3e ligne Romane Ménager qui terminait le boulot (0-19, 31e).

« On subit un peu, mais ce qui est très positif c’est que dès qu’on a un ballon, on rentabilise », jugeait justement Ménager à la mi-temps au micro de France Télévisions, orpheline de sa jumelle Marine, forfait sur commotion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Les Bleues repartaient en 2e mi-temps toujours portées par leur pack. C’est d’une nouvelle mêlée dévastatrice que Bourdon-Sansus lançait Gabrielle Vernier qui, tout en appuis, atteignait la terre promise pour l’essai du bonus offensif (0-26, 45e).

Puis la capitaine Manae Feleu marquait à son tour d’un pick&go, parachevant la démonstration des avants françaises (0-33, 58e).

Grisez fermait le tableau de marque dans les dernières minutes, mais c’est bien la performance du pack qui reste à l’esprit. Il faudra être capable de refaire un tel match, d’être aussi efficace aussi bien défensivement qu’offensivement tout en réglant les problèmes en touche, pour espérer faire tomber les Anglaises, vainqueurs de leurs 28 dernières sorties dans le Tournoi des Six Nations.

Womens Six Nations

P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
England Womens
4
4
0
0
20
2
France Womens
4
4
0
0
19
3
Scotland Womens
4
2
2
0
8
4
Italy Womens
4
1
3
0
6
5
Ireland Womens
4
1
3
0
6
6
Wales Womens
4
0
4
0
1
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 14 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search