Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Aussie Grades: Wallaby Player Ratings

The first test against Ireland felt like the start of a new era for the Wallabies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two debutants in the starting line up with another on the bench and lots of young players looking to make an impression in the build-up to the World Cup.

It was a war of attrition and not one for the neutral but the Wallabies won’t care as they got a much-needed win.

Scott Sio – 6
Solid in the scrum, offered himself more than Kepu for ball in hand

Brandon Paenga-Amosa – 6
Lost first line out, could have crumbled on debut but recovered well. Would want to see more of him in the loose.

Sekope Kepu – 6
Held the scrum up and a good cover tackle on Stockdale was all he produced, will be very aware of Tupou breathing down his neck for his spot and will have to offer more if he is going to keep the shirt.

Izack Rodda – 6
Complimented Coleman as a lineout option and tackled well, needs to be more of a ball carrier.

ADVERTISEMENT

Adam Coleman – 7
Rebels captain was a good lineout option and seemed to enjoy being the senior of the second rows. Some big hits in defence, costly penalty conceded chalked off Folau score.

David Pocock – 8
A welcome return to the back row. Made tackle after tackle and was always a nuisance at the breakdown. Ireland tried to resort to the dark arts to stop him but still couldn’t. Great line for his try.

Michael Hooper – 7
The captain always puts in a good shift, enjoyed being reunited with his partner in crime Pocock.

Caleb Timu – 5
Has had a big season for the Reds so far but was a non-entity really. Maybe overawed by the occasion, went off for an HIA and lucky to come back on.

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer

Will Genia – 7
His battle with Murray was eagerly anticipated. Both cancelled each other out most of the game. Covered well, superb vision for Foley’s try and generally kept the game ticking nicely for the Men in Gold.

Bernard Foley – 7
Defence was very good, was targeted a lot and answered all the questions, scored first try of the game.

Dane Haylett-Petty – 5
Superb try-saving tackle at the start of the second half on Stander, turned out to be crucial, other than that barely mentioned.

Kurtley Beale – 7
Looked like he could spark something didn’t quite happen. Unlucky that the Folau try was disallowed after good work.

Samu Kerevi – 5
Had no ball to demonstrate his attacking abilities, one run in the first half set up the Foley try.

Marika Koroibete – 6
Superb hit on Murray in the first half, defending well as always, unlucky not to score but like all the other backs, starved of ball.

Israel Folau – 6
Always solid under the high ball, not as much as a threat as usual, had a try disallowed for earlier foul play.

Tolu Latu – 6
Solid 25 minutes.

Taniela Tupou – 7
Massive pressure at scrum time, always a willing runner, surely not long before he takes over.

Rob Simmons – 6
Butchered a try when put through by Genia but continued the solid defensive work.

Pete Samu – 6
Great start when first on with a turnover within 40 seconds, was doing well when taken off for HIA reversal, not as effective when back on.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search