Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘We can’t change it’: Australia miss out on bronze after captain sees red

Nick Malouf of Team Australia is hugged by a teammate after losing the Men’s Rugby Sevens Men's Bronze Medal match between South Africa and Australia on day one of the Olympic Games Paris 2024 at Stade de France on July 27, 2024 in Paris, France. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Gutted coach John Manenti hopes he saw the path for future success as his beaten Australians sat on the sideline for an Antoine Dupont Olympic rugby sevens masterclass in France.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Dupont-inspired France took gold over Fiji after Australia, into the semi-finals for the first time, lost both their games on Saturday to finish fourth.

Australia led Fiji 7-0 in the semi-final before halftime but barely touched the ball again in a 31-7 loss.

A man down, Australia threatened an incredible comeback, only for South Africa to score after the siren and win their bronze medal match 26-19.

Two-time defending champions Fiji then tasted their first loss in Olympic competition in a pulsating final, French 15-a-side captain Dupont scoring twice and setting up another in a 28-7 triumph.

Manenti and his side sat on the carpeted athletics track to soak in that masterclass from one of the code’s best, the coach able to look ahead to Brisbane’s 2032 Games while wondering what could have been.

“We are not funded as a gold medal program and that’s what we’re trying to get to,” he said.

“Hopefully the powers that be can see we’re in that echelon, fighting for a medal here on a shoestring budget.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Staff, players, add a bit to it.

Related

“It’s LA (2028) into Brisbane and I’d like to think we can do what the French have just done.

“They’ve been building … I would have loved to have played them, even for bronze.

“Amazing atmosphere, Antoine Dupont: holy moley, what a player.”

Australia were blown away by Fiji but hung tough against South Africa despite similar adversity.

Defending for the first five minutes, Australia scored first and then at 7-7 were called back from an attacking position for a knock-on that replays suggested never happened.

A pass that appeared well forward led to another South Africa try and, in between, captain Nick Malouf was rightfully red-carded for a high tackle.

ADVERTISEMENT

At 19-7 and down to six men it looked like game over, but they scored the next two tries to level at 19-19.

Dietrich Roache missed the tough conversion and Australia were unable to secure the next restart Shaun Williams flew down the left wing to break Australian hearts after the siren.

“Tough; we fought so hard to get back in the game,” Manenti said.

“A couple of calls were pretty tough … that knock-on, that’s a big play.

“A big turning point and we know people will make mistakes but you don’t like to see them at this level

“But we can’t change it … the guys played their hearts out.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

7 Comments
J
John 145 days ago

Very poor by Malouf. A captain needs to set the standard. He didn’t.

G
GrahamVF 146 days ago

The French definition of shoestring budget is interesting as du Pont is contracted by the French RFU governing body. Incredible player. Just as well the Olympics and the RWC don’t coincide.

W
WR 146 days ago

Always the referees fault. Only when it's against South Africa it is always cheating. You know what fans like you get called these days? #CryBabies. The Aussies got further than they have ever gone in Olympics before. Be happy, Aussie rugby is on the rise. Considering where they were just last year still, they have managed to rise. Guess what? The Boks is in Aus for 2 tests. Now your team can punish the Boks for their insolence, their audacity of cheating and paying the referee off. How awful, how nasty of them. (That is sarcasm by the way) Your team went as far as they could and both the blitz Boks and the Aussie sevens teams went much further than either deserved. Be happy with that.

C
Cameron 146 days ago

Absolutely robbed, how did the ref award an Australia knock on when they didn’t even touch the ball, or a red card when there was no head contact? Meanwhile South Africa scored off a forward pass, a knock on, and a shoulder charge.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search