Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Australian bid to stage Lions tour doomed by 'minimum guarantee'

The British and Irish Lions

Australian hopes of pressuring the British and Irish Lions into agreeing to take their South Africa tour Down Under this summer are doomed by their offer of only a minimum financial guarantee.

ADVERTISEMENT

The perceived pressure being created by Rugby Australia is not impressing Lions officials with the bullish comments from Hamish McLennan, the chairman of Rugby Australia, trying to give their case a strength not recognised by those who will make the final decision. “They haven’t given a guarantee – it’s a minimum guarantee,” said a Lions source.

If a South African tour takes place then the financial risk lies with the host country rather than the Lions which is not the case with a tour in Britain.

Video Spacer

Owen Farrell after England’s loss to Wales:

Video Spacer

Owen Farrell after England’s loss to Wales:

The Lions cannot afford to agree to any deal that leaves them liable for a shortfall in income which is why the UK Treasury is currently considering a request to provide the financial guarantees to shield the most famous touring team from being left with a massive bill if the eight-match tour is switched to Britain and then hit by another lockdown. After a host country – New Zealand in 2017 – has taken their income, the remaining profit generated by a Lions tour is shared between the Home Unions which means there is no ‘float’ to cover any future losses.

The Australian offer is seen as part of their hearts and minds campaign to host the Rugby World Cup in 2027 and the Lions are adamant they will not be pushed into a corner. With so many variables still in the equation, the Lions have not set a date when they need to make a final decision on where the tour will be staged.

The Lions board is still focussed on how to deliver, if possible, a “traditional” tour and the only criteria they are using is safety not money and it will only be taken away from South Africa and moved to either the UK or Australia if the tour party and expected tens of thousands of fans travelling to South Africa are left exposed to the threat of COVID-19 this summer.

Lions officials are adamant that nothing has been decided yet and the proposed eight-match tour of South Africa – the preferred option – is still on the table. Lions head coach Warren Gatland has already looked at holding a month-long training camp in Jersey to create a Lions bubble. It is understood that postponing the tour for a year – possibly only playing tests in South Africa – is an option the Lions board do not favour with the Home Unions having individual tours already in place.

ADVERTISEMENT

Discussions are ongoing with South African government ministers but with the UK forging ahead with its vaccination programme, moving the tour to a first ever ‘home’ Lions series with South Africa becomes an attractive alternative although John Spencer, the former Lions player and manager on the 2017 tour to New Zealand, sees that option as destroying the ‘ethos’ of the Lions.

Spencer told the Yorkshire Post he would support postponing the tour until 2022, just a year before the World Cup in France. Spencer said: “Playing it anywhere other than South Africa this year may well help to destroy the ethos of the Lions; the very creed of the Lions is going to another country.

“It’s about spreading the gospel of rugby and all these countries absolutely adore the Lions. I’m not sure what will happen next but if they did have it here I’m not sure crowds would flock to see the Lions at home anyway. I would like to see the tour postponed for a year and then everyone will have exactly the same in South Africa in 2022.”

The Lions are scheduled to play Japan in Edinburgh on June 26 before flying to Cape Town for the three test series against the World Cup winners.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search