Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Australian players to receive pay rise despite concerns

Australia's poster girl - Charlotte Caslick. Under the CBA women will receive test match payments for the first time.

Despite declining ratings and attendance declining, Rugby Australia has negotiated a pay rise for players under the new collective bargaining agreement with the Rugby Union Players’ Association reports The Guardian.

ADVERTISEMENT

Under the new CBA negotiated by outgoing CEO Bill Pulver, the Super Rugby salary cap has increased from $5m to $5.5m in 2019 and 2020, a 10 percent rise while there is no limit to the cap in 2018 as Australian teams transition without the Force franchise.

The axing of the Force has freed up funds to pay for new conditions in the CBA. For the first time, Australia’s women will receive test match payments, men’s and women’s sevens players will receive equal pay and Super Rugby contracts will be subject to minimum terms and conditions.

The previous 30 (minimum) to 35 (maximum) Super Rugby player squads have been increased to a minimum of 36 players to a maximum of 40 allowing for other squads to absorb the Force roster. The Rebels have been active in the recruitment market, signing a spate of players from the defunct franchise.

The biggest coup of the CBA is maintaining current player payment rate, where players receive 29 percent of the revenue generated by the game, among the highest rates in Australian sport.

The CBA will expire in 2020 at the same time as the broadcast rights agreement, but with declining viewership, the game faces impending doubt in Australia. The short-term deal will kick the tough negotiations down the road, something incoming CEO Raelene Castle will inherit.

There has been recent speculation that more South African teams will follow the Cheetahs and Kings to Europe, threatening the existence of the SANZAAR committee responsible for Super Rugby. Given the South African broadcast rights are the typically the most lucrative, a South African exodus is sure to change the landscape of professional rugby in the Southern Hemisphere.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Razor has an about turn on All Blacks eligibility rules

Yep, another problem!


I think he would have, in the instance I mentioned, which wasn’t changing anything other than correctly applying todays eligibility quidelines. Which is an arbitrary construct, as the deal likely would have played out completely differently, but I just ‘allowed’ him to have 1 year sabbatically for his ‘loyalty’, rather than having some arbitrary number like 70 caps required.


So if Richie had a 3 year deal, and the first year he was allowed to use him still, I don’t think he’d really not transition to Dmac being his main 10, as he’s obviously the only one he can use for the following two years, therefore likely his only real option for the WC (very hard for Richie to overtake him in such a short time). Richie would purely be a security net in a situation like I proposition where there are only small changes to the eligibility.


The system is not working well enough though, as we don’t have the Rugby Championship or World Cup trophies, do we? Well on that last question, that’s all I’m really saying but I would not believe a word this author says, so it’s entirely a ‘what if’ discussion, but if the author is right and now they are actually going to be more flexible, I think that’s great yeah. Ultimately thought I think those two players were an anomaly signing their contracts and futures up so far ahead, especially of when they were performing. Both jumped at the opportunity of good contracts when their All Black prospects weren’t looking that bright.

51 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Clermont's comeback gathers pace as fallen European heavyweights plot path to redemption Clermont's comeback gathers pace as fallen European heavyweights plot path to redemption
Search