Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Back from the delivery ward, Farrell delivers some half-time home truths to fire-up sloppy Saracens

Newcastle's Alex Tait is tackled by Saracens' Owen Farrell and Maro Itoje at Allianz Park (Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

Owen Farrell was told last weekend to stay away from Allianz Park and instead take care of business in the delivery ward. Saracens easily survived without their prominent playmaker, brushing aside a hapless Glasgow in the quarter-finals of the Champions Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, Farrell was badly needed by the Londoners on his return to action a week after the birth of his first child. Saracens were losing 5-6 at half-time on Saturday against Newcastle, the bottom side in the Premiership.

And director of rugby Mark McCall later revealed how influential Farrell was in delivering some badly needed home truths during the interval team talk, words that produced a sufficient enough response to kick-start the revival that ensured a 26-12 win.

“We made nine changes from last week’s win and the players have been on a mini-break to Austria so we’ve had a restricted training week,” explained McCall following a win that heralded tries from Sean Maitland, Max Malins, Alex Lozowski and Nick Tompkins.

“In the first half, we made a lot of mistakes and our execution was poor. Our handling errors were huge but fortunately our defence was very good.

“Owen said a lot of things at half time so we understood what needed to improve in the second half. We still continued to make errors but we but it was a bit more like it, so I’m glad we found a way to win.”

Saracens’ Farrell-inspired riposte left Newcastle director of rugby Dean Richards bemoaning his side’s inability to take their chances. The defeat kept them rooted to the bottom of the Gallagher Premiership with four games to go and they remain three points behind 11th-placed Worcester.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tane Takulua kicked four penalties for Newcastle but it was not enough to secure a bonus point as they failed to take advantage of their first-half dominance. Richards said: “We had three clear-cut try-scoring chances in 60 minutes and took none, they had three and took all of them. Our scrum was dominant for 50 minutes and our line-out functioned really well.”

Saracens’ Alex Lozowski is congratulated after scoring the controversial fourth try versus Newcastle (Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

When Takulua kicked his fourth penalty, three minutes from time, Newcastle looked to have earned a deserved bonus point but a disputed last-minute try from Lozowski took that away. Prior to Lozowski’s finish, Saracens’ wing Alex Lewington appeared to have put a foot in touch but after lengthy discussions with the TMO, the try stood.

Richards said: “I don’t know it whether it was a try or not but I have to question why we were given such an inexperienced set of officials as we are not getting the bounce of the ball, which we need in our present position.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Next up for Newcastle is a home against fellow strugglers Leicester next Friday evening. Richards said: “We have to replicate this performance and effort next week but looking at Leicester’s line-up today they are a very strong side. Mark Wilson has tweaked his back but he should be back for next week.”

– Press Association

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search