Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ban means Jonathan Danty will miss the rest of the Six Nations

France's Jonathan Danty (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

France midfielder Jonathan Danty will miss the remainder of his country’s troubled Guinness Six Nations following his suspension for last Sunday’s red card in the draw with Italy.

ADVERTISEMENT

The La Rochelle centre was initially yellow carded in Lille, but his foul play was upgraded to red during the interval and he didn’t return to the field of play for the second half.

His absence severely impacted the French as they couldn’t build on their 10-3 first-half advantage, only securing a 13-all draw after Italy’s Paolo Garbisi hit an upright with a last-gasp penalty kick.

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show Live pitchside | RPTV

Following an incredible time at the Rugby World Cup, The Big Jim Show goes pitchside again in 2024. Catch all shows exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show Live pitchside | RPTV

Following an incredible time at the Rugby World Cup, The Big Jim Show goes pitchside again in 2024. Catch all shows exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Danty will now miss France’s remaining two matches versus Wales and England, as well as three La Rochelle games. However, his successful completion of tackle school would scratch the last game of that ban and free him to face the Stormers in the Investec Champions Cup round of 16 match on April 6.

A Six Nations statement read: “The independent disciplinary committee consisting of Jennifer Donovan (chair, Ireland), Leon Lloyd (England) and Stefan Terblanche (South Africa) heard the case and considered all the available evidence and submissions from the player and his representatives.

Fixture
Six Nations
France
13 - 13
Full-time
Italy
All Stats and Data

“The player admitted that he had committed an act of foul play and that it had been worthy of a red card. The disciplinary committee accepted that the player had acted recklessly, and not maliciously or with intent. The committee also highlighted that the player had accepted guilt at the earliest opportunity and shown immediate remorse on the field of play.

“On that basis and applying World Rugby’s mandatory sanctioning provisions, the disciplinary committee concluded that the incident warranted a mid-range entry point of six weeks suspension.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Mitigating factors (the player’s apology, acknowledgement of guilt and good conduct at the hearing) were applied, reducing the six-week entry point by two weeks. However, one further week was added for aggravating factors (the player’s disciplinary record) resulting in a five-week playing suspension.

“The sanction is to be served as the following given the player’s upcoming schedule:
March 9 or 10 – La Rochelle vs Stade Français (Top 14) OR Wales vs France (Six Nations);
March 16 – France vs England (Six Nations);
March 23 – Bayonne vs La Rochelle (Top 14);
March 30 – La Rochelle vs Oyonnax (Top 14);
April 6 – Stormers vs La Rochelle (Champions Cup).

“The player has additionally been given permission to apply to take part in World Rugby’s coaching intervention programme to substitute the final match of his sanction which is aimed at modifying specific techniques and technical issues that contributed to the foul play.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat Despite defeat in Paris, the real reason the All Blacks are feeling upbeat
Search