Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ban means Jonathan Danty will miss the rest of the Six Nations

France's Jonathan Danty (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

France midfielder Jonathan Danty will miss the remainder of his country’s troubled Guinness Six Nations following his suspension for last Sunday’s red card in the draw with Italy.

ADVERTISEMENT

The La Rochelle centre was initially yellow carded in Lille, but his foul play was upgraded to red during the interval and he didn’t return to the field of play for the second half.

His absence severely impacted the French as they couldn’t build on their 10-3 first-half advantage, only securing a 13-all draw after Italy’s Paolo Garbisi hit an upright with a last-gasp penalty kick.

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show Live pitchside | RPTV

Following an incredible time at the Rugby World Cup, The Big Jim Show goes pitchside again in 2024. Catch all shows exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show Live pitchside | RPTV

Following an incredible time at the Rugby World Cup, The Big Jim Show goes pitchside again in 2024. Catch all shows exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Danty will now miss France’s remaining two matches versus Wales and England, as well as three La Rochelle games. However, his successful completion of tackle school would scratch the last game of that ban and free him to face the Stormers in the Investec Champions Cup round of 16 match on April 6.

A Six Nations statement read: “The independent disciplinary committee consisting of Jennifer Donovan (chair, Ireland), Leon Lloyd (England) and Stefan Terblanche (South Africa) heard the case and considered all the available evidence and submissions from the player and his representatives.

Fixture
Six Nations
France
13 - 13
Full-time
Italy
All Stats and Data

“The player admitted that he had committed an act of foul play and that it had been worthy of a red card. The disciplinary committee accepted that the player had acted recklessly, and not maliciously or with intent. The committee also highlighted that the player had accepted guilt at the earliest opportunity and shown immediate remorse on the field of play.

“On that basis and applying World Rugby’s mandatory sanctioning provisions, the disciplinary committee concluded that the incident warranted a mid-range entry point of six weeks suspension.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Mitigating factors (the player’s apology, acknowledgement of guilt and good conduct at the hearing) were applied, reducing the six-week entry point by two weeks. However, one further week was added for aggravating factors (the player’s disciplinary record) resulting in a five-week playing suspension.

“The sanction is to be served as the following given the player’s upcoming schedule:
March 9 or 10 – La Rochelle vs Stade Français (Top 14) OR Wales vs France (Six Nations);
March 16 – France vs England (Six Nations);
March 23 – Bayonne vs La Rochelle (Top 14);
March 30 – La Rochelle vs Oyonnax (Top 14);
April 6 – Stormers vs La Rochelle (Champions Cup).

“The player has additionally been given permission to apply to take part in World Rugby’s coaching intervention programme to substitute the final match of his sanction which is aimed at modifying specific techniques and technical issues that contributed to the foul play.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search