Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Banned Brad Shields cleared to play again with immediate effect

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Brad Shields has been cleared to play for Wasps with immediate effect after his appeal against a four-match ban was successful. The ex-England international was suspended following his red card for a tackle in last Sunday’s Heineken Champions Cup loss to Munster. The sending-off by referee Romain Poite was viewed as very harsh, yet the New Zealander had the red card decision upheld at a disciplinary hearing and was set to miss this weekend’s European game at Toulouse and three Gallagher Premiership matches. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Wasps were furious with the outcome and their coach Lee Blackett explained on Wednesday at his weekly media conference that they would be appealing the verdict. They were right to do so as Shields was successful in arguing his case, is now free to play again and was named as his team’s skipper for their round two match in France but that fixture was ultimately postponed on Friday because of new travel restrictions brought in by the French government.

An EPCR statement read: “Brad Shields has had his appeal against a four-week suspension upheld following a hearing by video conference before an independent appeal committee on Thursday.

Video Spacer

Ali Price guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Ali Price guests on the latest RugbyPass Offload

“Shields was sent off by referee Romain Poite during his club’s Heineken Champions Cup round one match against Munster for tackling prop Dave Kilcoyne in a dangerous manner in contravention of law 9.13 and was subsequently suspended by an independent disciplinary committee. 

“The independent appeal committee comprising James Dingemans (England) chair, Donal Courtney (Ireland) and Roddy Dunlop (Scotland) considered video imagery of the incident and heard submissions from Shields, from Wasps team manager Dave Bassett, and from EPCR disciplinary officer Liam McTiernan. 

“The appeal committee agreed with the original decision that the red card threshold was passed. However, it decided that the disciplinary committee was wrong to find that there was no on-field mitigation. The appeal committee determined that there was on-field mitigation in that there was a late change in the dynamics of the tackle due to the tackle of another Wasps player, Thomas Young. This reduced the red card to a yellow card for the purposes of World Rugby’s head contact process. Therefore the appeal was upheld, and Shields is free to play.”

“He is desperate to play,” explained Blackett at his Wednesday media briefing. “He probably feels harshly done a little bit but honestly we have not had loads of conversations about it, we were talking about other things. We were hoping we would get a positive result from last night, which we have not and whatever will happen will happen. Brad is the ultimate team man and he was gutted on the day, but he has reacted positively and has been leading out on the field on both training days we have done this week.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Shields, who last month spoke at length to RugbyPass about the first-ever red card in his career which he received in September for two yellow-carded maul offences, had his tackle versus Munster ranked as a six-week entry point at his hearing and the fact he contested the charge meant he then didn’t receive the usual 50 per cent mitigation and was banned for four weeks rather than three.

There was mainly surprise that the original decision was a red card, pundits such as Andy Goode calling out the outcome reached by referee Poite, “He is what is known as a cowboy,” said Goode on this week’s Rugby Pod. “He is French, he is an absolute cowboy of a referee, Romain Poite, with that decision to send off Brad Shields with a red card. It is never a red. It doesn’t even make contact with his head for me.”

WASPS (vs Toulouse, Sunday)
15. Zach Kibirige; 14. Francois Hougaard, 13. Josh Bassett, 12. Michael Le Bourgeois, 11. Luke Mehson; 10. Jimmy Gopperth, 9. Sam Wolstenholme; 1. Tom West, 2. Dan Frost, 3. Biyi Alo, 4. Vaea Fifita, 5. Tim Cardall, 6. Brad Shields (capt), 7. Thomas Young, 8. Alfie Barbeary. Reps: 16. Michael van Vuuren, 17. Robin Hislop, 18. Pieter Scholtz 19. Kieran Curran, 20. Nizaam Carr, 21. Will Porter, 22. Rob Miller, 23. Alex McHenry.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search