Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Banned Fagerson must attend tackle school or miss World Cup opener

(Photo by Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images)

Zander Fagerson must successfully come through tackle school if he is to become available for selection to play for Scotland in their upcoming Rugby World Cup opener. The Scots begin their campaign with a September 10 clash versus South Africa, the 2019 champions, in Marseille and the tighthead must complete the World Rugby coaching intervention programme if he is to be an option for Gregor Townsend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fagerson was red-carded in last Saturday’s Summer Nations Series outing versus France in Edinburgh, an offence that has been deemed worthy of a three-match ban that will be reduced to two via tackle school.

A statement read: “Scotland prop Zander Fagerson appeared before an independent judicial committee via video link having received a red card for an act of foul play contrary to law 9.20 (a) (dangerous play in a ruck or maul: charging includes any contact made without binding onto another player in the ruck or maul) in the Summer Nations Series match between Scotland and France on Saturday, August 5.

Video Spacer

Siya Kolisi on his road to recovery

Video Spacer

Siya Kolisi on his road to recovery

“The independent judicial committee consisting of Rhian Williams, (chair, Wales), Jamie Corsi (Wales) and Juan Pablo Spirandelli (Argentina) heard the case, considering all the available evidence and submissions from the player and his representatives.

“In considering submissions made on behalf of the player, the committee agreed to amend the offence to law 9.20 (b): Dangerous play in a ruck or maul – a player must not make contact with an opponent above the line of the shoulders.

Related

“The player admitted that he had committed an act of foul play under the revised law and that it was worthy of a red card. After reviewing all the evidence, the committee applied World Rugby’s mandatory minimum mid-range entry point for foul play resulting in contact with the head. This resulted in the starting point of a four-week suspension.

“Having acknowledged mitigating factors including the player’s admission at the earliest opportunity, his remorse which was conveyed to the French player as well as shown during the hearing, and accepting that there were no aggravating factors to consider, the committee reduced the four-week entry point by one week, resulting in a sanction of three weeks (to be served as the following given the player’s upcoming schedule):

ADVERTISEMENT

Summer Nations Series
August 12: Scotland vs France;
August 26: Scotland vs Georgia.

Rugby World Cup
September 10: Scotland v South Africa.

“The player may apply to take part in the coaching intervention programme to substitute the final match of his sanction for a coaching intervention aimed at modifying specific techniques and technical issues that contributed to the foul play.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
C
Chris 466 days ago

As usual, the logic evades me.
I think we need a deep adult talk on what is to be done with the dangerous play and this so called "independent committee".
I am very happy that he will be available against SA and understand how it all comes into the equation. But why act like it is independent and objective?
Why not say : "It was a warm-up game for the world cup, there was obviously no intend to harm the other player. There was foul play yet we believe the sanction of forbidding a player to participate in this once in a lifetime event would be disproportionate considering the video evidence and the fact that it didn't have any effect on Bougarit's health. Therefore we won't punish the player by forbidding him to play the world cup and delay the sanction until October 30th with a 5 games ban due to his precedents."
At least we wouldn't be forced to watch this farce at display and I'm sure 98% of impartial spectators would agree.

R
Rohan 466 days ago

What an absolute mockery of the laws/ player welfare concerns. How can a player recueve a 4 game ban for an act, to then recieve another red for the same act and recieve half the ban. Saying "sorry I'm guilty" should not reduce the ban, nor should this ridiculous tackle school concept. If a 50 cap international needs a 'tackle school' he shouldn't be in international squads end of.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
France outwrestle All Blacks in titanic Test for one-point win

Yeah nar I pretty much agree with that sentiment, wasn't just about the lineout though.


Yeah, I think it's the future of SR, even TRC. Graham above just now posting about how good a night it was with a dbl header of ENGvSA and NZvFrance, and now I don't want to kick SA or Argentina out of TRC but it would be great if in this next of the woods 2 more top teams could come in to create more of these sort of nights (for rugby's appeal). Often Arg and SA and both travel here and you get those games but more often doesn't work out right.


Obviously a long way off but USA and Japan are the obvious two. First thing we need to do is get Eddie Jones kicked out of Japan so they can start improving again and then get a couple of US teams in SRP (even if one its just a US based and augmented Jaguares).


It will start off the whole conferences are crap debate again (which I will continue to argue vehemently against), but imagine a 6 team Pacific conference, Tokyo Sunwolves (drafted from Tokyo JRLO teams), Tokyo All Stars (made up of best remaining foreign players and overseas drafts), ALL Nihon (best of local non Tokyo based talent, inc China/Korea etc, with mainland Japan), a could of West Coast american franchises and perhaps a second self PI driven Hawai'i based team, or Jagaures. So I see a short NFL like 3 or 4 month comp as fitting best, maybe not even a full round, NZvAUSvPAC, all games taking place within a 6hr window. Model for NZ will definitely still require a competitive and funded NPC!


On the Crusaders, I liked last years ending with Grace on the bench (ovbiously form dependent but thats how it ended) and Lio-Willie at 8. I could have Blackadder trying to be a 7 but think balance will be used with him at 6 and Kellow as 7. Scott Barrett is an international 6 sized player. It is just NZ style/model that pushes him into the tight, I reckon he'd be a great loose player, and saders have Strange and Cahill as bigger players (plus that change could draw someone like Darry back). Same with Haig now, hes not grown yet but Barrett hight and been playing 6, now that the Highlanders have only chosen two locks he'll be playing lock, and that is going to change his growth trajectory massively, rather than seeing him grow like an International 6.

63 Go to comments
T
Tom 2 hours ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

Interesting post. I realise that try was down to Marcus Smith not Slade, this is why I mentioned that England's attack is completely reliant on Smith working miracles. Just wanted to highlight that Slade's little touch was classy and most English players would have cocked it up. Earl has gas, he's very athletic but Underhill is nailed on at 7 in my eyes though. They both need to be on the pitch so we need a tall 6 or 8 to complement them which we have in CCS and potentially Ollie Chessum. We also have young Henry Pollock who may be the 7 by the world cup.


The whole attack needs an overhaul but Richard Wigglesworth our attack coach was a very limited scrum half who excelled at box kicking and had no running game. Spent most of his career with Saracens who mauled, defended and set pieced their way to victory.... Which might have been ok if Felix Jones hadn't quit and been replaced by a guy who coaches Oyonnax who have one of the worst defences in the French 2nd division. I'm not too emotionally invested in England right now because this coaching setup isn't capable of winning anything.


England had no attack when they were winning under Eddie either. They battered teams with huge dominant tackles and won from pressure. The last time England had any creativity in attack was the Stuart Lancaster/Mike Catt era. They played some fantastic attacking rugby but results were mediocre, lots of 2nd place finishes in the 6N although it felt like we were building something special until we got brutally dumped out of our home world cup in the pool stage.

8 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Wales 'in one of their deepest holes for a long time' Wales 'in one of their deepest holes for a long time'
Search