Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Barbarians name team for Harlequins with Brown chosen as captain

(Photo by Tom Dulat/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Ex-England full-back Mike Brown has been named Barbarians captain for Thursday night’s tour game at Harlequins, the London club where he spent the majority of his career. The 37-year-old hasn’t played a rugby match since last March after he was told he would be released by Newcastle at the end of the 2021/22 season.

ADVERTISEMENT

Brown has maintained his training regime since in the hope that a full-time contract might still materialise to prolong his stellar career, something he recently spoke with RugbyPass about.

In the meantime, he has taken up an offer from the Baa-Baas to be involved in their two games this week, starting on Thursday at The Stoop before the show transfers to The Rec for Sunday’s match versus Bath.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Scott Roberston, who co-coached the Barbarians with Ronan O’Gara to their win last Sunday over an All Blacks XV at Tottenham, has remained on to coach the team this week helped by John Mulvihill and Scott Hansen.

However, just one of last week’s squad, John Ryan, is still with Robertson and the Munster prop will start at tighthead in a team that includes three players from the ABs XV after their tour ended against the Baa-Baas.

Damian McKenzie, Levi Aumua and AJ Lam are named in the XV that also includes ex-England midfielder Luthur Burrell before his move to the Japanese Top League. Numerous free agents from Worcester and Wasps are also named in the 26-strong matchday squad, as is Marland Yarde who has been without a club since parting ways in the off-season with Sale.

Harlequins have also named their team for the fixture and they have included Joe Marchant to start and Joe Marler on the bench after the pair featured for the Barbarians in the win over the All Blacks XV.

ADVERTISEMENT

HARLEQUINS: 15. Ross Chisholm; 14. Oscar Beard, 13. Joe Marchant, 12. Lennox Anyanwu, 11. Josh Bassett; 10. Will Edwards, 9. Danny Care; 1. Fin Baxter, 2. George Head, 3. Wilco Louw, 4. George Hammond, 5. Irne Herbst, 6. Jack Kenningham, 7. Will Evans 8. Alex Dombrandt (capt). Reps: 16. Jack Walker, 17. Joe Marler, 18. Simon Kerrod, 19. Dino Lamb, 20. Archie White, 21. Jack Stafford, 22. Hayden Hyde, 23. Cassius Cleaves.

BARBARIANS: 15. Mike Brown (capt); 14. AJ Lam, 13. Levi Aumua, 12. Luther Burrell, 11. Igancio Mendy; 10. Damian McKenzie, 9. Francois Hougaard; 1. Murray McCallum, 2. Stuart McInally. 3. John Ryan, 4. Scott Scrafton, 5. Kiran McDonald, 6. Elliot Stooke, 7. Olly Robinson, 8. Abraham Papali’i. Reps: 16. Gabriel Oghre, 17. Hayden Thompson-Stringer, 18. Kieran Brookes, 19. Graham Kitchener, 20. Iacopo Bianchi, 21. Gareth Simpson, 22, Rhyno Smith, 23. Tom Daly, 24. Cathal Forde, 25. Jacopo Trulla. 26. Marland Yarde.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search