Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bath shock Harlequins after thrilling try-fest in Twickenham

By PA
Marcus Smith celebrates a try - PA

Attack was the order of the day as Bath edged to a 45-35 win over Harlequins during a thrilling back-and-forth game at Twickenham.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bath were the first team on the scoreboard inside the first five minutes, hooker Tom Dunn the man to touch down in the corner before Ben Spencer added the extras for an early 7-0 lead.

Harlequins responded instantly, spinning the ball through the backs after a great line-breaking run from Lewis Gjaltema before Dino Lamb offloaded to Cadan Murley to sprint for the line.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Marcus Smith’s conversion brought the scores level before a Spencer penalty gave his side a 10-7 lead.

Soon after, Harlequins were back in the lead, in almost a carbon copy of their first try, Luke Wallace had the honour of crossing after a pass from Louis Lynagh, with Smith adding the conversion under the posts to put them up 14-10.

Two quick yellow cards for Andre Esterhuizen for a high tackle and Murley for a deliberate knock-on around the half-hour mark gave Bath a chance to dominate play, and they took quick advantage with GJ van Velze crashing under the posts from close range, Spencer duly converting for a 17-14 lead.

Not deterred by the numbers disadvantage though, Harlequins hit back, Smith offloading to Joe Marchant, who after a 20-metre burst, fed the ball back to Smith to race for the line and score, before converting to give them a 21-17 lead.

ADVERTISEMENT

There was still time for the visitors to get another try of their own though, Orlando Bailey’s cross-kick falling to Joe Cokanasiga after Josh Bassett had misread the bounce, his offload found Ollie Lawrence who held off the covering defence to touch down, Spencer’s conversion giving them a 24-21 lead going into the break.

After a frantic first half, the second half began as more of a slog, before Gjaltema scored Harlequins’ bonus-point try under the posts off the back of a ruck, all set up from Lynagh’s incredible run from halfway. Smith’s conversion made it 28-24 with just over 20 minutes to go.

Five minutes later, Bath retook the lead with a bonus-point try of their own, Niall Annett crossing after a rolling maul from a lineout, before extending it minutes later through Cokanasiga’s burst through the line from 15 metres out, and Spencer was perfect with both kicks to give them a 38-28 lead with 10 minutes to play.

Alex Dombrandt responded immediately, diving over after Smith’s incredible run was cut a few metres short, his conversion bringing the score back to 38-35.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the game was finally settled by Max Ojomoh’s juggling effort following Lawrence’s break with three minutes to go, Piers Francis’ conversion making it 45-35 to end a sensational afternoon.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search