Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bath player ratings vs Sale | 2023/24 Premiership semi-final

Bath's Elliott Stooke celebrates after Niall Annett's try (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Bath player ratings live from The Rec: This was it, the moment of truth for the two-season Bath transformation under Johann van Graan. On paper, a home semi-final gave the success-starved 1996 champions every chance of reaching a first Premiership final since 2015.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sale, though, arrived in hot pursuit of qualifying for their second successive decider. They gave Saracens a very bloody nose the last day, beating them in London in round 18 which enabled Bath to climb to second and secure this knockout game in their riverside backyard.

A Twickenham showpiece versus Northampton, Friday night’s latest conquerors of the now-dethroned Saracens, was the glittering prize awaiting the winners and come the shrill of referee Luke Pearce’s full-time whistle, it was Bath who were deliriously celebrating a 31-23 win. Here are the Bath player ratings:

15. Matt Gallagher – 6.5
Safe as houses without the glitz of opposite number Joe Carpenter.

14. Joe Cokanasiga – 6
His blocked run earned Bath the opening penalty but some of his defensive work was loose.

22m Entries

Avg. Points Scored
3.6
6
Entries
Avg. Points Scored
2.1
8
Entries

13. Ollie Lawrence – 8
Excellent. Supreme offload in the lead-up to the Beno Obano try followed by a try-saving tackle on Tom O’Flaherty.

12. Cameron Redpath – 7.5
A bulwark in defence, keeping Sale at bay.

ADVERTISEMENT

11. Will Muir – 7
His 50:22 secured the crucial territory for the Obano try. Rock solid in what he did throughout.

10. Finn Russell – 8
Exited to a 79th-minute ovation following a sparkling performance that tilted the result his team’s way.

9. Ben Spencer – 8
Another who opened up a box of tricks and who departed to a deserved last-minute ovation. His box-kicking was exceptional.

Beno Obano – 7.5
Has had his frustrations in recent years but showed he is on top form, even scoring a try and lasting 75 minutes. Did cost his team three points early in the second half with a scrum collapse.

ADVERTISEMENT

2. Tom Dunn – 7.5
Put in the hard, hard yards that laid the foundation for his replacement Niall Annett to arrive in the 68th minute and seal the deal six minutes later.

3. Thomas du Toit – 6.5
Has been a wonderful asset all season but this wasn’t his finest display and he was gone on 61 to accommodate Will Stuart. The scrum penalty given up just before the break was an example of things not fully going his way.

4. Quinn Roux – 7.5
An impressive 66-minute shift from another of van Graan’s canny recruits.

5. Charlie Ewels – 7.5
Ditto Roux. He played his heart out and was ultimately rewarded seeing his team close it out.

6. Ted Hill – 8
The glue of the Bath back row. His 12th-minute try set the tone, making a meaty break and then having the patience to stay wide and get a second touch. His interventions counted.

7. Sam Underhill – 7.5
Ran out of steam and departed on 58 minutes but aside from giving up the ruck penalty that allowed Sale to close to 18-15 at the break, his work was vital.

8. Alfie Barbeary – 6.5
The only starting line-up change from the win over Northampton, he was hooked on 51 after a limited enough effort where a high point was a carry in the Obano score.

Replacements:
Bath got it right with the bench. Miles Reid was a timely early introduction, while Annett came on and was the match sealer, not only with his try but also with his latching onto the loose ball in the play before the lineout. Elliot Stooke and Will Stuart were other excellent subs.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
Colin 202 days ago

Josh Bayliss was the early sub for Barbeary

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search