Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bath player ratings vs Ulster | Champions Cup 2023/24

Bath's Alfie Barbeary (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Bath player ratings live from The Rec: We arrived curious to learn whether Bath could transfer their huge upswing in Gallagher Premiership form onto the European stage; we left believing this could be the first season since 2014/15 that the once giants of the English game are potentially a real deal again in this tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not since 1998, when they lifted the trophy in Bordeaux versus Brive, have Bath been considered a true Champions Cup heavyweight.

Three quarter-finals and a sole semi-final appearance have been their lot in the quarter-century since then – and you even had to go back to January 2018 to find their most recent pool win before this deserved 37-14 success versus Ulster.

Video Spacer

Sam Warburton discusses the Champions Cup format

Video Spacer

Sam Warburton discusses the Champions Cup format

Premiership buoyancy (five wins in eight outings for second place) in Johann van Graan’s second season in charge have the fans believing that the outlook is now finally bright again.

And with new arrival Finn Russell orchestrating their attack and club owner Bruce Craig forking out to improve the soft pitch stitching in recent weeks, their run of 10 successive Champions Cup losses finally ended with a second-half flourish decorated by three late tries. Here are the Bath player ratings:

Match Summary

2
Penalty Goals
0
5
Tries
2
3
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
143
Carries
94
7
Line Breaks
4
10
Turnovers Lost
14
6
Turnovers Won
2

15. Matt Gallagher – 6.5
Is keeping Tom de Glanville out of the selection and we saw in patches why. It was his kick that gave Ulster the prompt for their second try, but he had the last laugh with his last-minute walk-in.

14. Joe Cokanasiga – 7.5
Unwanted by Borthwick’s England for the recent Rugby World Cup but cherished by van Graan’s Bath. Eager all afternoon for ball involvement and he was adequately rewarded with two well-taken tries.

ADVERTISEMENT

13. Ollie Lawrence – 8
Has been in top gear in recent weeks and he reprised all that and more here. Will be kicking himself – literally – for the error that gifted Ulster their first try, but his frequent defence-busting carrying was so very important to ensure Bath were rich winners.

12. Cameron Redpath – 7
Another who has been impressive of late and he too continued that influence versus Ulster, even joining the maul for the crucial Tom Dunn try and then landing a splendid touchline conversion right at the finish.

11. Will Muir – 6
It was his footwork that was important in getting Bath busy in attack early in the game when chances were at a premium. Less involved in the second period, but still solid.

10. Finn Russell – 7.5
Has been touted as the best bang-for-buck singing in this season’s league and there sure is magic in his hands with his ability to shift the ball. He quit the kicking tee duties after making a hames of an early attempt, but the other parts of his game were up to scratch.

ADVERTISEMENT

9. Ben Spencer – 8
The skipper played a captain’s part, even taking on the place-kicking duties after Russell’s mishap. His ability to make the right decision was encapsulated by his fabulous pass for Cokanasiga to break the first-half deadlock.

1. Beno Obano – 8
It’s been a while since the loosehead has caught the eye but he was top-notch here with his set-piece and his all-round game and he sounded chuffed when talking about it post-game.

2. Tom Dunn – 7
Had one lineout stolen but didn’t falter, going on to score the early second-half converted try that put Bath into the lead they were never to lose.

3. Will Stuart – 7.5
Gave it socks in his battle with Steven Kitschoff and it was a scrum penalty advantage on halfway that allowed Bath to have to courage to go and attack, pressure that eventually led to the lead-taking converted maul try some minutes later. Exited on 52 minutes for Thomas du Toit to do his thing excellently, both at set-piece and with a try.

4. Elliott Stooke – 6.5
A game of contrasts in that he won some ball and lost some ball, but his engine kept purring and he made sure Bath eventually won the arm wrestle. Not bad when you consider this was only his second outing since his return from Montpellier.

5. Charlie Ewels – 6.5
Ran out solo to fireworks for what was his 150th appearance, he can take great pride that he helped to eventually subdue this Ulster effort.

Related

6. Miles Reid – 7
Up against an old Exeter mucker in Dave Ewers, he was a willing ball carrier and he came up with an important penalty-winning turnover at an early second-half breakdown.

7. Sam Underhill – 7.5
Tackle king in the Rugby World Cup bronze final, it was no surprise that he led the Bath charge defensively here to top that particular category.

8. Alfie Barbeary – 7.5
Comes with a much chunkier complexion these days, which generously helps his ball-carrying heft. Will be annoyed that one lost ball contributed to Ulster’s opening score but he otherwise led the fightback.

Replacements:
18. Thomas du Toit – 8
While Ulster fired on multiple subs early, the tighthead was the only Bath replacement to have more than 10 minutes. He was excellent in his 28-minute appearance, scoring and dominating at the set-piece.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search