Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘We could have sold out The Rec a few times over’

BATH, ENGLAND - MAY 18: Bath fans show their support following their side's victory during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Bath Rugby and Northampton Saints at The Recreation Ground on May 18, 2024 in Bath, England. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Bath are set to sell out The Rec for the seventh time this year as the club’s success-starved supporters dare to dream that the long wait for silverware may be over.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tickets returned by play-off semi-final opponents Sale Sharks have been selling quickly since they were put on general sale by Bath on Wednesday morning, with the majority purchased straight away.

Play-off fever has gripped the rugby-mad city and with Bath’s own allocation snapped up in no time at all, despite the eagerly-awaited match not being included in season tickets, and the exorbitant prices they are being asked to pay, there won’t be many spare seats, if any, come Saturday’s 3.30pm kick-off.

After an inauspicious start to the season crowd-wise against Newcastle in round one, when just 9,680 fans came through the gates – the lowest attendance for a Premiership match outside of the Covid era since the ground was expanded to its current 14,509 capacity – Bath supporters been every bit as consistent as their team this season in turning up in big numbers.

Lured by sight of Finn Russell in blue, black and white post-World Cup, and encouraged by the form of a team that never fell outside of the top-four, they have paid through the nose to witness in person what has been a remarkable transformation from Premiership easy-beats to potential champions.

Related

Even when asked to stump up £52 to stand behind the posts, and nearly double that in the seated main west stand, Bath supporters have still turned up.

The Round 3 game against Leicester had an attendance of 13,748, and since then in only one match – Gloucester at home in Round 11 (13,943) – has not been full to capacity. As local rivals, the visit of Gloucester always draws a big crowd but the first sporting weekend of any new year is a tough sell.

ADVERTISEMENT

Across the whole of this season, The Rec has had an average occupancy rate of 94%, with sell-outs against Bristol, Exeter, Harlequins, Sale, Saracens and Northampton – the game that clinched a home semi-final, that’s worth an estimated extra £1 million in revenue.

It has been 28 long years since Bath were last crowned English league champions but victory over Sale would leave them 80 minutes away from ending that barren run.

Since the last of those triumphs in 1996, Bath have only won the 1998 Heineken Cup and 2008 European Challenge Cup, despite major investment from Andrew Brownsword and latterly Bruce Craig.

Craig, who acquired the club in 2010, has been every bit as patient as Bath’s long-time suffering supporters who, Head of Rugby Johann van Graan acknowledged this week, have supported the club through “thick and thin”.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’ve got fantastic supporters that have been there from the first round of the Premiership right through the Champions Cup and now onto the final stages of the Premiership and we want to do them proud,” he said.

“If you look at the interest for tickets and how quickly we sold out the stadium, I think we could have sold out the Rec a few times over.

“It’s good to see and most pleasing thing from a team point of view is that the City of Bath is proud of the club and proud of the players and that’s not lost on us. It is a huge part of the community culture.”

Van Graan has been fortunate to be at clubs with passionate support before – the Bulls and Munster, which can work for you and against you – but at present, he can’t do any wrong in the eyes of folk of a blue, black and white persuasion.

Even with the introduction of million-pound man Russell, Bath were 14/1 outsiders to win the league at the start of this season. But those odds have been cut to 12/5 following a season of huge progress and they are now favourites to get past Sale and make it through to their third Premiership final, having previously lost to Wasps in 2004 and Saracens in 2015.

“Our supporters have gone from hoping that we will win to believing that we will win,” added van Graan.

“What an amazing picture it was (against Saints) last Saturday, to see everyone in the east stand wearing their Bath jerseys proud to be associated with this club.

“When we finished the game, there was still a minute or two to go in the Saracens-Sale game, and it was amazing that everyone in the stadium stayed. And when they announced that we had a home semi-final, that noise evolved. It shows that whatever the players deliver on the pitch, the supporters will back it up with their noise and support.

“Bath supporters are certainly up there with every other place I have been involved with.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 12 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search