Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Beauden Barrett is showing what he can do without the Horror-canes pack

(Photo by Michael Bradley/Getty Images)

There was a period there where it felt as if every Hurricanes season culminated in a clash with the Crusaders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Inevitably two things would happen.

First, the Crusaders would decimate the Hurricanes up front, en route to an emphatic victory.

And, second, a fair chunk of the rugby reporting and watching public would opine that Beauden Barrett wasn’t up to it.

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 9

Video Spacer

Aotearoa Rugby Pod | Episode 9

That he couldn’t manage a game, couldn’t rise to the big occasion and couldn’t be trusted to guide the All Blacks to victory in a test match of consequence.

At some point these misgivings would be put to then-national coach Steve Hansen, who would let out an enormous sigh and mumble something about how Barrett might look if he was playing behind the Crusaders’ pack, rather than the Hurricanes.

It was hard not to recall Hansen’s words as we watched Barrett turn the tables on the Crusaders in Christchurch last Saturday night.

We’ve probably all chucked our two bobs’ worth in on Barrett’s move to the Blues.

Should he have stayed a Hurricane for life? Could he have commuted down from Auckland, as Daniel Carter once did to remain a Crusader? Was he letting his wife dictate his rugby career?

ADVERTISEMENT

What we didn’t tend to do, was wonder aloud about how good Barrett might look behind a decent forward pack.

The Blues are not the finished article. Beyond Barrett, their backline doesn’t instil great confidence.

But when you’re playing off the kind of platform being laid by the Blues’ forwards at the moment, then it’s easy to look a competent player.

Barrett, though, looks more than competent. He looks commanding.

Given time and options, few players possess his vision and ability to execute. With goalkicking returning to the arsenal in Christchurch, Barrett was once again the complete first five-eighth.

ADVERTISEMENT

We got things badly wrong three or four years back.

We took Barrett, at that time probably the best player on the planet, and stuffed him around.

We took goalkicking off him, shunted him to fullback and generally undermined the confidence of the most gifted footballer of his generation.

And for what?

Were the All Blacks any better? Did they win any more games? Did they waltz their way to the 2019 Rugby World Cup title?

We can’t repeat the mistakes of the past now.

There’s no Barrett v Richie Mo’unga debate. There’s Barrett as the undisputed starter at 10 and then those that back him up when required.

Stuff contestability or keeping incumbents honest. This is a time for certainty and, if Super Rugby Pacific has taught us anything, it’s that Barrett is certainly the best first five-eighth in the country.

Playing behind a good pack helps as, no doubt, not getting TJ Perenara’s inconsistent service is probably a blessing too.

But as we approach next year’s World Cup and survey an All Blacks squad in which plenty of spots appear up for grabs, let’s not make No.10 one of them.

Let’s declare that, without reservation or qualification, the All Blacks will be Barrett’s team and that he will be taking ownership for the results from first five-eighth.

You can’t put 10s on the hot seat. You can’t have them looking over their shoulder at who might replace them next week.

You have to tell them they’re in charge and give them the confidence to succeed.

I doubted Barrett would earn that right again. Having been mucked about, I wondered if he’d make a permanent move overseas.

I mean, it’s not that long ago that Otere Black was the Blues’ starting 10, for heaven’s sake. Imagine the indignity for Barrett of playing second fiddle to him.

Thankfully those days are over and, with it, Barrett’s wasted years playing as an additional playmaker from fullback.

All we need now is an All Blacks’ pack to do Beauden Barrett’s talents justice.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
J
John 946 days ago

Why no byline?

M
Michael 947 days ago

BB is fine when his team is going forward, but does some silly stuff when his team is going backwards

J
Jonathan 947 days ago

BB is a great player for sure and I used to back him as the undisputed 10, but Richie Mounga came along, and he can do everything Barrett does and more. He breaks tackles better, he steps opposition better, and he covers more ground than Barrett to be in the right place st the right time. RMs not perfect, but one solid game from BB against a wobbly 2nd string Crusaders doesn't make him king of the 10s.

A
Andrew 948 days ago

  1. He was the MOM against the Chiefs by a country mile. 2. Perenara (a loose forward masquerading as a HB) must never go anywhere near an AB jersey again. 3. In the second half of that game (where the Blues at last managed to do what the Chiefs have done numerous times in the last 18 yrs)... Barrett reverted to his bad habit of aimless inaccurate kicking...which all but cost them a win.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 44 minutes ago
South Africa player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

There is this thing going around against Siya Kolisi where they don't want him to be known as the best national captain ever, so they strike him down in ratings permanently whenever they can. They want McCaw and reckons he is the best captain ever. I disagree.


Just like they refuse to see SA as the best team and some have even said that should the Boks win a third WC in a row, they will still not be the best team ever. Even if they win every game between now and the WC. That is some serious hate coming SA's way.


Everyone forget how the McCaw AB's intimidated refs, was always on the wrong side, played on the ground etc. Things they would never have gotten away with today. They may have a better win ratio, but SA build depth, not caring about rank inbetween WC's until this year.


They weren't as bad inbetween as people claim, because non e of their losses was big ones and they almost never faced the strongest Bok team outside of the WC, allowing countries like France and Ireland to rise to the top unopposed.


Rassie is still at it, building more depth, getting more young stars into the fold. By the time he leaves (I hope never) he will leave a very strong Bok side for the next 15- 20 years. Not everyone will play for 20 years, but each year Rassie acknowledge the young stars and get them involved and ready for international rugby.


Not everyone will make it to the WC, but those 51/52 players will compete for those spots for the WC. They will deliver their best. The future of the Boks is in very safe hands. The only thing that bothers me is Rassie's health. If he can overcome it, rugby looks dark for the rest of the rugby world. He is already the greatest coach in WR history. By the time he retires, he will be the biggest legend any sport has ever seen

4 Go to comments
J
JW 59 minutes ago
'They smelt it': Scott Robertson says Italy sensed All Blacks' vulnerability

No where to be seen OB!


The crosses for me for the year where (from memory);


This was a really hard one to nail down as the first sign of a problem, now that I've asked myself to think about it. I'd say it all started with his decision to not back form and fit players after all the injuries, and/or him picking players for the future, rather ones that could play right now.


First he doesn't replace Perofeta straight away (goes on for months in the team) after injury against England, second he falls back to Beauden Barrett to cover at fullback against Fiji, then he drops Narawa the obvious choice to have started, then he brings in Jordan too soon. That Barret selection (and to a lesser extent Bell's) set the tone for the year.


Then he didn't get the side up for Argentina. They were blown away and didn't look like they expected a fight and were well beaten despite the scoreline in my opinion. Worst performance of the year in the forth game and..


Basically the same problems were persistent, or even exaggerated, after that with the players he did select not given much of an opportunity, with this year having the most number of unused subs I can remember since the amateur days.


What I think I started to realise early on was that he didn't back himself and his team. I think he prepared the players well, don't get me wrong, but I'll credit him with making a conscious choice in tempering his ambition and instead choosing cohesion and to respect (the idea of it being important in himself and his players) experience first and foremost (after two tight games and that 4th game loss). I think he chose wrong in deciding not to be, and back, himself. Hard criticism.


And it played out by preferring Beauden to Dmac on the EOYT (though that may have been a planned move).


I hope I'm right, because going through all the little things of the season and coming up with these bullets, I've got to wonder when I say his last fault is one we have seen at the Crusaders, playing his best players into the ground. What I'm really scared of now is that not wanting a bit of freshness in this last game could be linked with all these other crosses that I want to put down to simple confidence issues. But are they really a sign that he just lacks vision?


Now, that's not to say I haven't seen a lot of positives as well, I just think that for the ABs to go where they want to go he has to fix these crosses. Just have difficult that will be is the question.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search