Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Beauden Barrett ruled ineligible for Blues' playoff run

Beauden Barrett of the All Blacks looks on during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between New Zealand and Italy at Parc Olympique on September 29, 2023 in Lyon, France. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Beauden Barrett will not suit up for the Blues in 2024 despite a late push by the injury-plagued Auckland club to bring their star playmaker back early for the Super Rugby Pacific playoffs.

ADVERTISEMENT

The news was expected but ultimately confirmed this week by Super Rugby Pacific tournament director Matt Barlow, via the New Zealand publication Stuff.

April 1st is the cut-off date for playoff eligibility in the context of players returning from overseas contracts, meaning Barrett, along with his fellow senior All Blacks returning from short-term Japan contracts, does not meet the criteria.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The relevant rules are implemented with the aim to protect the “integrity of the competition and ensure fairness for all teams,” Barlow said in his statement issued to Stuff.

“This is in alignment with World Rugby Regulations which precludes the holding of dual contracts.

“SRP teams are permitted to apply for dispensation to the tournament director for a player who has arrived after April 1, but dispensation can only be granted in the event the arriving player has played four regular season matches and signed a contract to play in SRP the following year.

“Beauden Barrett was not able to meet the stipulated requirements for dispensation and as such he has been ruled ineligible for SRP finals 2024.”

Related

This doesn’t mean Barrett is ineligible for the Blues’ final game of the regular season – a clash with the Chiefs in Auckland – but the purpose of his potential involvement in that match is sure to be eliminated following this confirmation.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the other side of that contest is a Chiefs outfit with a recent addition to camp themselves in the form of former All Blacks captain Sam Cane.

While Blues coach Vern Cotter had described his team’s interest in bringing Barrett back as a “you never know” situation, referring to both the eligibility criteria and his squad’s injury status, Chiefs boss Clayton McMillan revealed his camp had taken a more proactive approach to testing the eligibility waters ahead of Cane’s return.

“I don’t know how much to read into that,” McMillan said last week. “Is it just a bit of noise to bring some attention to the Blues or is it legitimate, I’m not too sure. If it’s legitimate, I know there’s a process to be followed, one that we looked into ourselves, about a month ago.”

Cane wasn’t necessarily the target of that query though, with All Blacks lock Brodie Retallick mentioned amongst the Chiefs’ injury troubles in the second row.

“We were told in pretty explicit terms that we may have been able to make a case for it to play round-robin games, but there was no chance he could play finals.”

The Blues relinquished their commanding grasp on the top spot on the Super Rugby Pacific table – and therefore homefield advantage throughout the playoffs – over the weekend with a loss to traditional foes the Crusaders in Christchurch, leaving their regular season finale to determine their potential playoff travel fate.

Watch the exclusive reveal-all episode of Walk the Talk with Ardie Savea as he chats to Jim Hamilton about the RWC 2023 experience, life in Japan, playing for the All Blacks and what the future holds. Watch now for free on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes Warren Gatland finds out his fate as Wales undergo huge changes
Search